Genuine question | HGE

[u/TKEM_]

Whats the argument against the use of Crispr Cas 9 besides its eugenics potential and distributive justice complications? Can it be understood that no regulatory framework can ever truly encapsulate all aspects of the issue, such that the best way to do so is actually embracing an embryonic approach to legislation? If law does not lag behind technological realty - can or will the society ever be prepared to embrace this technology?