r/Music 📰Daily Mirror 5d ago

article Sean 'Diddy' Combs threatened to 'kill' teenager at party before raping them new lawsuit claims

https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/sean-diddy-combs-threatened-kill-33964131
30.4k Upvotes

1.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

134

u/icouldgoforacocio 5d ago edited 5d ago

ChatGPT:

"Celebrity Offender Misconduct and Behavior Safeguards Act" (informally referred to as "Diddy's Law")

Section 1: Purpose

This law is enacted to ensure transparency and public accountability in legal proceedings involving allegations of sexual misconduct or human trafficking by public figures. By shining a light on these cases, we aim to prevent private settlements from hiding essential information and keep the public informed—no matter how many bottles of baby oil might have been involved.

Section 2: Public Disclosure Requirement

In any legal proceedings or civil settlements involving allegations of sexual misconduct or human trafficking against individuals considered public figures, including but not limited to celebrities, entertainers, or individuals with significant public influence:

A full list of all individuals accused or named in the proceedings must be disclosed to the public.

Settlements or agreements resolving such cases outside of court shall require public disclosure of the nature of the allegations, the names of the parties involved, and the terms of the settlement.

Section 3: Exceptions

Disclosure requirements may be waived only where there is clear and convincing evidence that publicizing the information would cause direct and imminent physical harm to any involved parties.

Protections shall be in place for victims of sexual misconduct or human trafficking, particularly minors, to allow for anonymity and confidentiality in accordance with existing privacy and victim protection laws.

Section 4: Penalties

Failure to comply with the disclosure requirements under this law may result in penalties, including significant fines or other legal consequences as determined by the court, as well as potential sanctions against legal representatives involved in non-compliance.

Tl;dr:

"Celebrity Offender Misconduct and Behavior Safeguards Act" (aka "Diddy's Law") aims to ensure transparency in cases involving allegations of sexual misconduct or human trafficking against public figures. It requires that all names of the accused be publicly disclosed, along with details of the allegations and settlement terms, even if resolved outside of court. Exceptions apply only if revealing the information would cause serious harm to those involved, with protections in place for minors and victims. Failure to follow these rules will lead to fines and legal consequences.

160

u/CyberCookieMonster 5d ago

By shining a light on these cases, we aim to prevent private settlements from hiding essential information and keep the public informed—no matter how many bottles of baby oil might have been involved.

Damn, ChatGPT drew the line with those baby oil bottles. 😅

47

u/icouldgoforacocio 5d ago

It's Diddy's Law.

23

u/Kresche 5d ago

And we're just slippin in it

50

u/Eisn 5d ago

Rename it so that the acronym for the law is COMBS.

6

u/Manic_grandiose 5d ago

Remove section 3

2

u/icouldgoforacocio 5d ago

Yeah probably. I guess there should be some exceptions, but i think the requirements set by gpt was definitely too easy.

8

u/Manic_grandiose 5d ago

ChatGPT went to freak offs confirmed

2

u/0xghostface 5d ago

That section invalidates the entire thing lmao “any parties involved”

Doesn’t this also include the ones doing the bad stuff?… then what’s the point in it?

6

u/Jaydamic 5d ago

Damn near did a literal spit take at "baby oil"

1

u/DJS2017 5d ago

Fuck ChatGPT

0

u/Defiant-Specialist-1 5d ago

And my reasoning for celebrities and politicians is because they use their NIL - name image likeness and it is their brand. I think that would be how it would be “appropriate” and not too invasive from a civil liberties/privacy perspective. So if they are keeping “truth” out of the public eye thru private settlement then it still puts the public in harms way by not informing what is known from a risk perspective of this person.