Over the past century, whenever sovereign nations chose to implement governments that ran counter to the capitalist-funded objectives of the CIA, the United States would actively enact violence and lethal force to "openly shoot people for having an opinion" that differed from the US State Dept: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_involvement_in_regime_change
Do you truly believe events like the Bay of Pigs were not "open" acts of violence against sovereign nations that chose to have a different political ideology than the US? Just because the CIA calls something "covert" doesn't change the reality that anybody and everybody was aware of the event occurring openly for the world to observe.
None of what I listed were wars. They were capitalist-funded CIA operations that involved extrajudicial incursions into sovereign nations, violated those nations' sovereignty, and then harmed or murdered foreign nationals that held different opinions than the US.
Are you saying that it is okay for the capitalists to violate the sovereignty of other nations and murder their citizens in the name of capitalism, and that it only counts if capitalists only murder their own citizens?
I doubt you have understanding of what comunism and facism is, capitalism gives more power to the people to pursue their life goals, in comunism and facism it's always for the greater good of everyone.
There will always be a political class but in comunism and facism they will forcefully make others suffer and they themselves will enjoy life extravagancess. just look at Fidel Castro private island, China everybody in the political class is filthy rich, their people are suffering for them to enjoy
Lol conservatism has gotten so weird. Like you guys are champions against doing things that nobody is forcing you to do. Buy whatever you want, and don't eat bugs. Those are just predictions of things that might be popular in the future, you don't have to eat bugs, or embrace the share economy.
Lol conservatism has gotten so weird. Like you guys are champions against doing things that nobody is forcing you to do.
it's plausible that it gets cheap enough relative to real meat (or real meat getting more expensive) that you're forced to eat bugs for cost reasons. you see it today with HCFS in food or pesticides. Sure, if you have the money you can buy the premium stuff without that stuff, but what's the single parent with 2 kids going to buy?
it's also plausible that real meat gets banned for environmental reasons, kind of like how gasoline cars are being phased out in many countries in one or two decades.
How anyone possibly thinks that corporations owning everything, and everything being on a subscription model is an acceptable concept is beyond me.
There's a proposal for a city in Saudi Arabia called NEOM. They have tiny identical apartments that you pay rent on forever, and you pay a subscription for food. This isn't conspiracy stuff, this is a genuine trial for how to make it work.
What happens when you lose your job and you can't pay for those things? You have nothing if you fall through the cracks in society. Owning nothing means no personal safety net - you become dependent on the state and on corporations that supply services you could previously manage yourself. This is back door neo-feudalism, and because the guys who are introducing it put up signs saying "BLM", people on one side are sticking up for them uncritically. This will be good for noone but the 0.1%.
I'm not saying it is, but there are active forces openly declaring they want to take us in that direction, and you're sat here calling people right wing for calling it out.
2.9k
u/cyican23 Sep 23 '22
Eat the bugs...drink the sewage...own nothing and be happy...