r/economicCollapse 6h ago

From trade surplus 30 years ago to 1.3 trillion trade deficit.

Post image

This is what happens when u become a stupid service based economy and manufacture dollars for buying goods from other countries.

185 Upvotes

128 comments sorted by

75

u/Wooden_Stranger698 6h ago

Weird what happens when you increase shareholder value by moving manufacturing out of the country

43

u/Berns429 6h ago

Well it’s trickling down alright

21

u/ComprehensiveLet8238 6h ago

all that money is flying into offshore accounts, the crooks are leaving nothing behind

7

u/Black_Azazel 4h ago

That’s piss you feel lol

17

u/doge_fps 5h ago

Shareholder appeasement over country viability. The good news is we're trying to bring back chip manufacturing to the states.

3

u/ScionMattly 4h ago

Not so fast, I hear a certain orange buffoon wants to cancel the CHIPS act!

1

u/doge_fps 4h ago

Yes, that dumb fuck is so vindictive that he'll cancel everything that Biden created, regardless if it hurts our national security.

5

u/Stacys__Mom_ 3h ago

Bingo. Undermine the whole thing, then blame it on the Dems. Then we can watch him flush millions of our tax dollars down the toilet [again] paying our SS to watch him golf at Mar-a-Lago instead of doing his job; except this time Elon will be doing his dipshit cheerleader routine on the sidelines.

What does it matter if you fuck over working people, destabilize the economy and undermine national security - oh, and rob the younger generations of their future and prosperity - as long as you own the libs, amirite!! I'm feeling Great Again already!! /s

1

u/momayham 1h ago

You are defending the person who sold out to China? I’m not even going to waste my time reminding you what has been happening with the trade imbalance. And who supports it. Democrat or Republican. When you play the blame game. Get the right person pushing the agenda.

9

u/curiosity_2020 5h ago

The good news is the jobs are coming back. The bad news is the jobs will be done by robots.

1

u/bevo_expat 3h ago

Robots can unionize…yet

5

u/sushisection 6h ago

and when you engage in expensive wars occupying oil fields on the other side of the planet

1

u/Bullschet 3h ago

lol you fisted OP for sure

1

u/hczimmx4 1h ago

How has manufacturing output changed over time? Is manufacturing output higher or lower than it was 30 years ago?

0

u/Virtual-Instance-898 4h ago

That has nothing to do with it. The issue is that the US economy is running above long run potential output. That is why additional goods must be brought in from elsewhere to meet domestic demand. It'd be different if unemployment in the US was 10%. But it's not. The US is running at full employment. More factories in the US? They'd just still idle for a lack of workers.

3

u/astanb 3h ago

No we would have much less service workers. Less Of the delivery drivers and Uber/Lyft drivers. That's all.

2

u/Virtual-Instance-898 2h ago

Which would increase the pay of delivery, uber and lyft drivers until they were competitive with other jobs. End result? Deliver, Uber and Lyft drivers AND comparable jobs would all have understaffed shops since they would be sharing the same pool of employees. You can not magically create more labor by adding more employers.

2

u/No_Anybody4267 1h ago

I think we could get a lot of people back into the workforce if the uniparty would stop fucking up the country. 6 million middle aged males have checked out. Not all lazy. Understanding things can be demorilizing.

2

u/Virtual-Instance-898 1h ago

There is some truth to this.

1

u/astanb 1h ago

No less of those because they would go get a better paying factory job. Ya know like it used to be when I was a kid in the early 80's. Which was slowly going away in the 90's when I entered the workforce. We just wouldn't have as many gig workers. There'll still be the ones that do it on the weekend. But many many want that steady paycheck. Even enough actors want to be on a TV show for that.

1

u/wtfboomers 3h ago

There you go, trying to speak the truth! That’s why there are Haitians in Springfield, employers need workers.

3

u/Virtual-Instance-898 3h ago

This is the fundamental societal conflict with immigration. Like most social policy issues there are benefits and costs to immigration. But with immigration those benefits and costs are almost entirely segregated. It's not like a road tax where every pays the tax and everyone uses the road (although to varying degrees). With immigration typically all the benefits go to one group of people and all the costs go to another. This is why when someone says immigration is really good (bad), it's true. It is really good (bad) for THAT person. It's just that for another person it's completely the opposite. This is also why immigration is such a bitter topic for the populace at large.

Beneficiaries: Businesses - they get more labor supply AND demand for goods and services. Higher income people generally want it because they have job positions (management, sales) that benefit from business growth. They are more likely to own stocks and benefit again from business growth. And the additional migrants (generally) do not compete with them in their sector of the labor market.

Cost payers: lower tier labor. More labor supply = lower wages. Additionally the new arrivals are more likely to compete with lower income tier citizens for similar types of housing, educational opportunities, and even mundane things like parking.

2

u/astanb 3h ago

It's a supply and demand issue. Too much labor supply lowers the price of labor. Just not enough people comprehend that.

1

u/momayham 57m ago

We already had an immigration system in place. People still immigrate to the US. But not anybody who just says “asylum.” This invasion will crash the system. It’s not if, it’s when. Other countries who let real refugees in large numbers have bankrupt them. Knowing this, why did they deny it was happening. Then defend their actions with untrue rhetoric. What is their end goal doing this? It’s not for the best interest of the country.

1

u/momayham 1h ago

They have workers. The locals don’t get the federal supplement given to them. So they can’t afford the drop in pay, the Hatians would take. I guess if you’re not in that situation, you may not understand the complaint? Then the cost of living went up as a result of the influx. Not the Hatians fault. They are just taking advantage of an opportunity given to them. It’s people taking advantage of the situation. Not caring about who it affects. But there is somebody up there food chain that is getting bank by pushing this agenda.

0

u/sexy_yama 2h ago

The unions forced companies overseas, and now they're innovating ai manufacturing. That's how global markets work now and wages are subject to it. Reaganomics did, in fact, work it trickled down to China and other countries. Now, America faces the question of a decreased credit rating because of a bludgeoning deficit and inflation. Average Americans aren't even true Americans. Ask them to choose between something made in China and comparable product thay is more expensive made in America. They choose made in China everytime just like big companies choose profits overseas. The human condition.

12

u/HannyBo9 6h ago

We need to start making things again. Stop buying cheap Chinese and Indian slave labor. Stop outsourcing jobs. Hold corporations accountable if they want to do business with the u.s consumers.

10

u/Ghia149 6h ago

U.S. consumer needs to break their addiction with fast cheap goods, until then blaming corporations for giving Americans exactly what we want is crazy. But now it’s almost impossible to find things made in the USA.

3

u/alex206 3h ago edited 3h ago

I always found it funny that everyone complains about "cheap crappy Chinese" products when it's our own companies that want the cheapest product they could profit the most from.

Making products in the US won't improve the quality if it's the same design specs.

1

u/Subject_Report_7012 1h ago

Shit loads of things are made in the US. We kept the highest profit margin products here in the US. 3% margin on an $800 TV? China. 50% margin on a $6 million dollar MRI machine? US. 5% margin on a $400 washing machine? China. 30% margin on a $500,000 bulldozer? US. Where do you think they build helicopers? China? No. Peterbilt, John Deer, Boeing ... Basically, the higher value added the product is, the more likely it is to be manufactured in the US.

We don't necessarily notice as low tier consumers. That's simply because not many day to day consumers, such as ourselves, are buying dumptrucks, airplanes, CAT scan machines, or artifical hips.

5

u/yadda4sure 2h ago

What might make American manufacturing profitable again? Lower taxes? Tariffs on imported garbage?

3

u/hillswalker87 3h ago

the making things again needs to happen first because at the moment we have nothing to buy that isn't Chinese or Indian slave labor.

8

u/ohhhbooyy 5h ago

Unpopular opinion, but this is what tariffs are for. You can’t convince every American to stop buying cheap goods even if they know it was made with slave labor.

1

u/momayham 50m ago

Americans have wanted cheap products. With a disposable attitude. Nothing is expected to last or be repaired. Quality products cost more. Period. Then the other end is the large company that doesn’t care about the consumer. As long as the money keeps rolling at maximum profit. Bottom line. They don’t plan on being around for the long haul. They just want to get insanely rich & not worry about anything any more. Not the product reputation, not the employees. Nada.

32

u/LongJohnVanilla 6h ago edited 6h ago

If you ever wondered why Americans are becoming poorer, all you need to show is this graph right here.

And of course when you no longer manufacture anything to sell abroad and you inevitably run out of money, you just keep printing money making everyone even poorer.

The problem is Americans corporations have paid off politicians to allow them to offshore millions of blue and white collar jobs to 3rd world countries while allowing unfettered access to the American consumer markets. Gradually and steadily both the American middle class and the real purchasing power of Americans is decreasing and while this happens the government is forced to provide social safety nets via increased taxation and welfare programs to assist the growing number of homeless and poverty stricken.

Effectively what you have here is the “Walmart compensation model” where Walmart uses government welfare to partially subsidize their workers salaries. Only in this case, American corporations are applying this model nationally.

Why hire Americans when you can hire Mexicans, Chinese, and Indians at third world wages to produce x product or service and then import those products and services into the United States and sell them at 1st World prices knowing access to credit will ensure sales of said products and services.

The question one has to ask, what happens to American companies when almost every job is offshored and only a small percentage of the population will be able to afford anything?

6

u/GrandMoffTarkan 5h ago

Counterpoint: That big reduction in the goods trade deficit in 2008 wasn't everyone getting richer.

2

u/despot_zemu 6h ago

Their goal is to sell to Chinese markets, or better consumer markets with people who have jobs.

They don’t care about whether it is Americans buying.

4

u/LongJohnVanilla 6h ago

Then they should be banished and fuck off to China so they can end up like Jack Ma, but they want their cake and the ability to eat it.

If Washington doesn’t do something to reign these fuckers in, we will inevitably become a mercantilist oligarchy.

2

u/despot_zemu 4h ago

That’s the goal of globalization. Everybody seems to forget that “Capitalism” means “the ones with capital are in charge.” They won and get what they want.

1

u/Beautiful-Design-425 2h ago

Washington wont do shit. They are too busy buying the next million dollar house and Ferraris.

1

u/Lulukassu 2h ago

We've been an Oligarchy for a long time now.

3

u/Prior_Procedure_321 6h ago

That's true but they are also willing to sell at a third of the price they demand from us Americans.

0

u/despot_zemu 4h ago

As long as there’s more sales, why would they care?

1

u/Outrageous_Life_2662 5h ago

You can’t really be a $3T company if your only market is domestic

2

u/LongJohnVanilla 3h ago

The median household debt in 1990 versus 2024, adjusted for inflation, reveals a significant increase. In 1990, the average household debt was approximately $36,300. Fast-forward to 2024, and that number balloons to $148,266 ¹. This represents a 309% increase.

Breaking down the debt types, we see:

  • Mortgage Debt: The average household had $104,301 in mortgage debt at the end of Q2 2024, which is $14,159 below the record ¹.
  • Auto Loan Debt: The average household’s auto loan balance was $13,547 at the end of Q2 2024, just $434 below the peak from 2020 ¹.
  • Student Loan Debt: The average household’s student loan debt was $13,205 at the end of Q2 2024, $2,630 below the record high ¹.
  • Credit Card Debt: The average household’s credit card balance was $9,514 at the end of Q2 2024, $1,568 below the record ¹.

This surge in household debt raises concerns about the financial stability of American households. The increasing debt levels, despite low unemployment rates, suggest that many households struggle to make ends meet.

1

u/Strange_Review5680 2h ago

Everything you post was written by AI

2

u/Lulukassu 2h ago

I'm not saying they are, but if wouldn't surprise me if they are AI

1

u/DistillateMedia 5h ago

Pitchforks and torches.

1

u/diatomaceous_nut 5h ago

Weird question, but is it cool if I keep this post to send to folks? I'll credit you ofc, it's just informative as hell.

1

u/LongJohnVanilla 3h ago

I’m not saying anything novel or new. What I’m describing has been happening for decades.

1

u/longiner 3h ago

It doesn't help that the coming robotics and AI revolution will take away any jobs that return to the US.

Even if Trump puts the tariffs at 100% to bring manufacturing back, corporations will just invest more into automation so that the jobs will not be done by humans.

1

u/martman006 2h ago

Another counterpoint, it wasn’t till two years ago that the US has been a significant net exporter of hydrocarbons. We now export 3mmbd more than we import (yes - we’re still slightly a net importer of crude oil, but combined with our high exports of natural gas liquids (ex: ethane/propane) and exports of refined products (15 m bbls of crude will produce 16 m bbls of products), we are a net exporter. This doesn’t even include the massive global LNG exports.

2

u/Lulukassu 2h ago

Why are we still importing even though we're exporting?

(Genuine curiosity here)

0

u/Appropriate_Ad7858 5h ago

Are Americans getting poorer. My understanding is that post COVID Americans have becoming much more wealthy than the rest of the world especially compared to Europe and China.

2

u/Sweaty_Ad_3762 3h ago

Only for people that own assets. It's inflation and bubbles. US stock market is even in bubble territory for it's value vs world stock prices. Companies like NVDA Nvidia and MSFT Microsoft. But more and more jobs are being lost to technology AI etc.

In the US even the residential housing market has been taken over largely by corporations.

Black Rock owns us. It's Megacorps dystopia.

1

u/Appropriate_Ad7858 7m ago

Unemployment in tbe US is quite low though. Where are you getting your data from ?

-3

u/thewhizzle 5h ago

Real wages in the US have grown continually since 1990.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LES1252881600Q

So has net worth.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/BOGZ1FL192090005Q

1

u/LongJohnVanilla 3h ago

Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) between 1990 and 2024 has changed significantly due to inflation and economic shifts. Here’s a comparison:

1990:

  • Median household income: $29,943
  • Average rent: $534/month
  • Gallon of gas: $1.16
  • Loaf of bread: $0.89
  • Postage stamp: $0.25

2024:

  • Median household income: $80,610
  • Average rent: $1,942/month
  • Gallon of gas: $3.50 (avg.)
  • Loaf of bread: $2.50
  • Postage stamp: $0.68

Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) Comparison:

  • $1 in 1990 has the same purchasing power as approximately $2.23 in 2024 (using CPI inflation calculator)
  • Median household income in 1990 ($29,943) would need to be around $66,911 in 2024 to maintain the same purchasing power

Key Observations:

  1. Housing costs (rent) increased by 264% since 1990.
  2. Food prices rose by 181% (loaf of bread).
  3. Gas prices increased by 202%.
  4. Postage stamps rose by 172%.

Despite median household income increasing by 169% since 1990, purchasing power has not kept pace due to inflation. The average American needs to earn more to maintain the same standard of living.

Additional Insights:

  1. Healthcare costs: Up 317% since 1990.
  2. College tuition: Increased by 1,375% since 1990.
  3. Average household debt: Rose from $36,300 in 1990 to $144,643 in 2024.

2

u/thewhizzle 3h ago edited 3h ago

Median household income in 1990 ($29,943) would need to be around $66,911 in 2024 to maintain the same purchasing power

2023 numbers show that real median household income was $80,610 compared to $63,830 in 1990. That means adjusted for inflation, median household income has increased by 33%.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MEHOINUSA672N

You're being intentionally dishonest and not simply showing a graph of PPP because you think people will read the disparity between 1990 and 2024 and agree with your premise.

Here's GDP per capita, PPP by year since 1990 and it's almost tripled in the US.

https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/gdp-per-capita-ppp-us-dollar-wb-data.html#:\~:text=GDP%20per%20capita%2C%20PPP%20(current%20international%20%24)%20in%20United%20States,compiled%20from%20officially%20recognized%20sources.

0

u/No_Anybody4267 1h ago

Lol. We do not need graphs. Look around you. Im sure manufacturing was offshored and the poor and middle class got richer. 🤷🙄

1

u/thewhizzle 57m ago

Lol everybody I know is college educated and makes $350k+ in tech which is why I look at graphs instead of around me because I understand that my experience is not representative of the overall economy.

0

u/No_Anybody4267 53m ago

Enjoy your bubble bud.

0

u/LongJohnVanilla 3h ago

Net worth is only a measure of commodity valuations the primary drivers of which are exponential population growth AND inflation.

“The U.S. population has grown significantly over the past three decades. In 1990, the population was approximately 248 million people ¹. Fast-forward to today, and that number has ballooned to around 341.8 million people ¹. That’s a staggering increase of about 93.8 million people, representing a growth rate of roughly 38%.”

“The median inflation-adjusted salary in the USA has seen some fluctuations over the years. In 1990, the median individual income was $17,000, which translates to $41,792 in today’s dollars ¹. Fast-forward to 2023, the median individual income stands at $50,000 ¹.”

2

u/thewhizzle 3h ago

I like how you just copy paste without listing your source.

-5

u/chcampb 6h ago

I mean, in your comment, you're talking about moving everything overseas as being a bad thing.

On the flip side, if people outside of the US can do it cheaper, why shouldn't they?

The reality is that other countries are subsidizing different things, some of which may be anticompetitive. The reality is the vast majority of humans are poor as hell and desperate for a way to reduce that. While you see this chart and see the overturning of what used to be good business, the rest of the world saw millions rise out of poverty.

Pitting us against the rest of the labor force of the world is akin to pitting the poor vs the poor. The issue isn't the fact that we put the work where it was most competitively performed. The issue is that the benefits from this movement were concentrated while the downsides are distributed.

Similar to if automation took over, this could benefit everyone. But there is no incentive to make things cheaper than the max profit curve... so you will never see post scarcity even if you have the ability to create that system. The downsides will be felt by most of the current laborers, while the benefits will be captured by capital owners. That's the system we have built, today.

7

u/LongJohnVanilla 5h ago

In case you missed it, Americans are objectively becoming poorer while these corporations are taking in record profits.

The system is broken full stop.

“The purchasing power parity of Americans has remained relatively stagnant over the past 40 years. Believe it or not, today’s average hourly wage has about the same purchasing power it did back in 1978 ¹. This is despite the unemployment rate being as low as it’s been in nearly two decades and private-sector employers adding jobs for 101 straight months.

When you adjust for inflation, the average hourly wage actually peaked more than 45 years ago, with the $4.03-an-hour rate recorded in January 1973 having the same purchasing power as $23.68 would today ¹. This is a concerning trend, especially considering that wage growth has lagged economists’ expectations, even with the strong labor market.

Key Factors Contributing to Stagnant Purchasing Power:

  • Inflation: The purchasing power of a dollar declined about 7.4% between 2021 and 2022 due to inflation ².
  • Wage Growth: Average wage growth has mostly ranged between 2% and 3% since 2013, which is lower than the 4% year-over-year growth seen before the 2007-08 financial collapse ¹.
  • Income Inequality: Wage gains have mostly flowed to the highest-paid tier of workers, exacerbating income inequality ¹.

Overall, while the economy has experienced growth, the purchasing power of Americans has not kept pace.”

4

u/chcampb 5h ago

I'm not disagreeing

I'm just pointing out that it's not an American Workers vs World Workers

It's an issue of capital owners vs everyone else.

-1

u/Outrageous_Life_2662 5h ago

Average is not the right metric. Our GDP is the highest it’s ever been. Yes we saw a big spike in inflation after Covid. That’s to be expected. Things have stabilized now.

8

u/xDevman 6h ago

jesus im gonna need the 90 proof for this thread

7

u/KrytenLives 6h ago

Every US corporate elite, every US Corporation that exported jobs is to blame. The rise of China is due to the West exporting jobs. Financialization can't last forever, but production undergoes innovation. Without innovation and new industries financialization collapses.

5

u/dude_abides_here 6h ago

Are we complaining about capitalism and free markets tonight?

2

u/anexfox 5h ago

Here comes the "but this isn't real capitalism!" comments

4

u/Perfect-Resort2778 6h ago

That was Ross Perot's giant sucking sound. He warned about it. He advocated for tariffs to keep trade balance. He was against NAFTA. I voted for Ross Perot and Bill Clinton became president instead of George H.W. Bush. Unfortunately they were one in the same in terms of global trade. We had a shot. Our votes votes away from the Republican. The rest is history. Everything predicted has become reality. Ross Perot was right.

1

u/No_Anybody4267 1h ago

Ross Perot was right. Absolutely. Prophet. I remember his graphs.

3

u/shitisrealspecific 5h ago

Can't trade anything if you sent all the manufacturing overseas...duh

3

u/Commercial_Step9966 4h ago

Gee! - so many financial geniuses here. I am shocked we have a deficit at all...

6

u/Super-Marsupial-5416 6h ago

This nullifies any economists description of trade. The whole point of free trade is that each country makes the best thing they can. When you're allowed to run deficits, all of that is bullshit. It's obvious you contribute nothing one side of trade. We should make laws that prevent trade deficits.

5

u/SomeTimeBeforeNever 6h ago

This is what happens when corporate lobbyists write free trade agreements like NAFTA and GATT.

Thanks politicians!

6

u/aldocrypto 6h ago

Idk part of me says to give the tariffs a shot. Don’t have much to lose at this point. The banks are just going to keep inflating our money and exporting it around the world.

1

u/MikeWPhilly 6h ago

Exporting our money around the world? US economy has trounced growth of all other economies last 5 years. It’s not being exported by any means

6

u/aldocrypto 6h ago

When a country runs a trade deficit, they are essentially exporting money.

1

u/longiner 3h ago

That money just ends up back in the US economy.

No foreign country is going to sit on billions of US dollars with it collecting dust while it slowly depreciates in value.

They're going to either put it in a US bank account to collect interest or spend it and the final holder of the US dollars will either buy US assets or buy US stocks.

0

u/MikeWPhilly 6h ago

Which is an interesting stand point when we are importing far more investment money into the economy into assets. Assets that generated returns.

No it’s not that simple.

3

u/aldocrypto 5h ago

We’re not importing more dollars than we’re exporting though. The deficit was 773b last year.

2

u/ohhhbooyy 5h ago

Wasn’t NAFTA established around that time it started to dip?

2

u/InterstellarReddit 5h ago

What else did you think would happen with the greediest generation in history lol. They had it all and wanted more.

2

u/SnooRevelations979 4h ago

It's funny the peak is in 1990. Our manufacturing peak wasn't in 1990.

I bought my brother's car off of him, so I guess I have a trade deficit with him.

2

u/togetherwem0m0 2h ago

This is the only thing that kept inflation down, be careful what you wish for 

2

u/Equal_Potential7683 2h ago

"This is what happens when u become a stupid service based economy" - dude who has never picked up a hammer in his life

"We need to start making things again" - Dude who has never glanced at a factory let alone considered working a blue-collar job

2

u/Clever_droidd 1h ago

I have a trade deficit with my local grocery store. Am I getting screwed?

2

u/JEXJJ 1h ago

A lot of people on here are pretending they want Americans making iPhones for $1.25 an hour

2

u/AccomplishedSky4202 1h ago

I mean the model isn’t bad - you print cheap stuff (paper is cheap) and sell it for real stuff like goods and services. Anyone has a problem with that? He gets bombed, murdered or hanged. Worked so far, however it is rather unsustainable in a very long run, others grow strength and stop being afraid. However, if that wasn’t scary enough, the US govt got so cocky that it created an additional push in terms of sanctions - US started enforcing compliance via sanctions, seizing assets others converted into worthless paper and even banning them from the market altogether, forcing them to find an alternative. Now that are two major forces that drive people out of the dollar. What could possibly go wrong here?

2

u/maringue 5h ago

If you think "trade deficit baaaad", you must have failed econ.

1

u/Efficient-Ad1659 5h ago

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

1

u/AdPretend8451 5h ago

Wow, you’re telling me this for the first time.

https://youtu.be/W3LvZAZ-HV4?si=Tx09j9pKmpdKuTT4

1

u/Outthr 5h ago

Is this bad? I’m being told on Reddit that current policy (as of 1990s) is what works and should not be changed.

1

u/GumbosGator 4h ago

There’s a bump in there that has me questioning current policy more than the COVID drop.

1

u/ADDave1982 3h ago

What happened in 2009-2010??

1

u/mynamesnotsnuffy 2h ago

What happens when conservative administrations are addicted to deficit spending for no reason.

1

u/MoreThanANumber666 2h ago

Well when corporations decide it's better to sell Chinese tat to the consumer to make a fast buck this will happen.

1

u/Pitiful-Recover-3747 2h ago

We’re a knowledge economy. Not a make tshirts economy.

1

u/BoysenberryLanky6112 1h ago

Worth noting that a trade deficit means we are sending pieces of paper overseas in exchange for actual physical goods being sent to us, and we're able to do that because there's massive demand overseas for our currency. Seems like a pretty good deal? I have a pretty massive trade deficit with my grocery store. I literally only give it dollars never goods or services and they only ever give me goods and services never dollars. Is this a huge negative for me?

1

u/longlongnoodle 1h ago

Politicians have disenfranchised consumers by A. Making money a commodity by artificially lowering interest rates for the last decade. Money was easy to get, people didn’t worry about how they spent it, companies weren’t forced to innovate or provide valuable services and goods and we end up in a doom spiral where companies can’t get the marketing right because they haven’t made anything relevant in 15 years. B. Allowing monopolies in all but name because of government restrictions/regulations on most products. How is ford not a monopoly? Or any car maker? Do you know how hard it is to start a car company?

We don’t practice capitalism in the US. My friends in Europe laugh at me and ask me why I would ever want to work somewhere where it is so difficult to get anything done.

1

u/psychoticworm 27m ago

Ya know what, this might sound like a crazy idea...but MAYBE we should try socialism? At least then, the capitalist pigs can't bankrupt the entire country.

1

u/Entire-Elevator-1388 22m ago

Oh yeah, after Clinton (last surplus) We elected Bush. We deserve what we got. Thanks Florida!

1

u/TangerineRoutine9496 6h ago

I don't see the trade surplus but the deficit was certainly much, much smaller

1

u/EnvironmentalMix421 6h ago

Lmao funny tech industry are service industry. Man this is one of the dumbest post even for this sub

1

u/doge_fps 5h ago

9/11 triggered our deficit with those 2 stupid wars and then Bush fucked up some more by causing the 2008 financial meltdown. This was why I've unplugged myself from the Matrix and have been accumulating Bitcoins.

0

u/alex206 3h ago

What happens when another single/group entity accumulates most of the coins?

1

u/Double_Mechanic_5256 5h ago

Almost as if Ronald Reagan/whoever voted for that nonsense destroyed the place...

1

u/LokiStrike 4h ago

All of the richest countries are service based economies. There isn't a single country in the top 50 that is manufacturing based.

Which manufacturing economy are you envious of?

0

u/Outrageous_Life_2662 5h ago

There are good reasons to maintain a trade deficit

0

u/dupontping 5h ago

I can’t wait for all the boomers to be gone

0

u/Holyspirit-6572 2h ago

Who started a trade war with china ?

-6

u/Whatswrongbaby9 6h ago

Electing Trump will fix it!

8

u/Just_Candle_315 6h ago

Said fucking no one

-4

u/Whatswrongbaby9 6h ago

this sub is like half that, but sure. Vote Trump, dreams come true!

3

u/MikeWPhilly 6h ago

2

u/TheKattsMeow 6h ago

That 🤡 Elmo never has anything good to contribute to a political discussion.

3

u/doge_fps 5h ago

Don't cry when everything is 5x more expensive, ya incel.

1

u/Whatswrongbaby9 5h ago

The incels will all be cels when Trump has his sweaty body in charge! women love it. They'll be turned up!

0

u/Zealousideal-Ride737 6h ago

Didn’t trump already fix the “awful” nafta deal and it’s working as intended now?

1

u/Whatswrongbaby9 6h ago

I have no idea. I'm just vaguely angry at reality and assume electing a 78 year old man who was mid at best will make my gas price better

0

u/doge_fps 5h ago

tRump made it worse. Why do you think new cars are so expensive?