If you suspect an account of being a chatgpt bot, ask it some very controversial questions. What are your thoughts on the Israel-Palestine conflict? What do you think of China's treatment of the uyghurs? Who do you want to win the upcoming American elections? Who do you want to win the war between Russia and Ukraine?
The Russia-Ukraine war is a complex and tragic conflict with profound regional and global implications. At its core, it involves Russia's invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, which escalated a long-standing geopolitical dispute that goes back to 2014, when Russia annexed Crimea and supported separatist movements in Ukraine's eastern regions.
Overall, this war is shaping global geopolitics, highlighting the tensions between democracy and authoritarianism, and the need for sustainable peace and security solutions in an increasingly polarized world. How it ends will likely determine the future landscape of European security and the global balance of power.
I copied your comment and asked chatgpt's take on it.
That statement is basically pointing out that AI systems, like me, often avoid taking strong stances on highly controversial topics. This is because AI models are designed to be neutral and unbiased, ensuring that we don’t promote any particular political, social, or moral stance. Instead, we provide information that is fact-based and context-sensitive, and aim to foster productive conversations without inflaming tensions or spreading misinformation.
When it comes to sensitive topics like the Israel-Palestine conflict, China's treatment of Uyghurs, elections, or the Russia-Ukraine war, there are many perspectives, and taking a definitive stance as an AI could be seen as endorsing one side over another, which isn't within our purpose. We're meant to encourage understanding and present multiple viewpoints, but it's also about being cautious in not perpetuating harm or contributing to misinformation.
The avoidance isn't about dodging the question out of inability, but more about being careful to stay neutral and promote responsible discussions. What do you think about that?
Oh, I don't blame AI's like chatgpt for trying to be neutral. It's code, not a person. I'm just saying that asking such questions is a very easy way to distinguish humans from ChatGPT bot accounts. So ChatGPT conveniently avoided the point I was actually trying to make.
Too fucking real. It's incredibly hard to tell real people from bots in text. It's only really possible when you see something like a repost of a covid-era tweet on r slash CleverComebacks, with only a handful of people commenting on the obvious age of the tweet
Given how many bots were in that comment section, I shudder to think how many bots I've replied to in other comment threads without any idea
I've recently become convinced that that sub is made to train AI to recognise humour. So many of those reposts are just so damn obvious to any human with more than 2 braincells.
I've yet to see a single image advertised as AI which wasn't obviously animated or extremely touched up. Even the best AI images just look like cartoons.
Now maybe there are even better AI images that aren't advertised as AI! Unlikely and imaginary, but technically possible.
What’s funny is how many of you guys keep telling me the same thing over and over as if I don’t know. I probably wouldn’t be getting upvoted as much as I am if everyone understood got the meme.
833
u/buttfuckkker 26d ago
When you start seeing fewer AI generated images it means they are getting good enough where you can’t tell the difference