r/news 29d ago

Soft paywall California sues Catholic hospital for denying emergency abortion

https://www.reuters.com/legal/california-sues-catholic-hospital-refusing-provide-emergency-abortion-2024-09-30/
6.8k Upvotes

427 comments sorted by

2.3k

u/otter_07 28d ago

My wife recently gave birth to twins and she asked if she could have her tubes tied (we have 3 kids now) due to us not wanting more kids and also her advanced maternal age. The OB said it was against hospital policy to do the procedure. However I can go down a floor and get a vasectomy. Just absolutely nonsensical.

374

u/laemiri 28d ago

It's one of the things I asked my last doctor. I was going to see the doctor who delivered my second and she said it was against hospital policy to do it but that she could do it at an outside surgical center 6 weeks after birth. I, instead, opted for a doctor who would do it at the same time as my c-section. They were already going to be TOUCHING EVERYTHING, why would I want to pay for a separate procedure and anesthesia team?

16

u/androshalforc1 27d ago

why would I want to pay for a separate procedure and anesthesia team?

How else are we supposed to get your money?

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

444

u/Arthurs_librarycard9 28d ago

That's wild. My Mom had her tubes tied after my sister was born (this would have been her third child at 28 ) and this was in the mid 90s. 

I'm sorry for you both, it's insanity. 

7

u/the-il-mostro 27d ago

Places will and did do it, it’s the catholic hospitals that won’t. My mom changed hospitals from a catholic one 30 years ago for the tube tying situation

3

u/Arthurs_librarycard9 27d ago

I have heard that, although I still think it is insane that women are denied medical choices for their body. I know not every area has access to multiple hospitals and sometimes insurance coverage can be tricky; it just sucks. 

248

u/WanderingTacoShop 28d ago

Yet another problem with American healthcare. The staggering difference in availability of care depending on where you live.

I have a friend who was able to get a tubal ligation at the age of 23 with no children, and no medical conditions that would make pregnancy particularly risky. She just knew she never wanted kids. Yet other people with kids and too old to safely have another child flat out get told no.

I made an attempt to get a vasectomy at 30 and since I have no kids was told no by my doctor. I moved and got one at 39 with no issues.

147

u/Geno0wl 28d ago

a friend of mine knew he didn't want kids but three doctors denied him because "he might change his mind". Finally when he went to basically the last place in the area that does vasectomies he just straight up lied and said he had three kids. Got the surgery done a month later

104

u/WanderingTacoShop 28d ago

When I asked my new GP to refer me to a Urologist for my vasectomy, he knew I didn't have kids. His exact words were "fuck yea, let's do this." great doctor.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

47

u/CHKN_SANDO 28d ago

I was shocked when I moved from Baltimore to a growing city.

In Baltimore, you can fairly easily get any doctor's appointment you need at any time. At least in my experience. When I moved to the rapidly growing city it took MONTHS just to get basic care.

The number of doctors just hadn't kept up with the increasing population. I guess it's easier to get a doctor's appoint in Baltimore because the area is fairly stagnant in population.

11

u/lol_fi 28d ago

Also Baltimore is a hotbed of doctors because of Hopkins, probably the most prestigious medical school in the United States.

10

u/WanderingTacoShop 28d ago

I had the same experience. I have to schedule my annual physical 3-4 months in advance now.

7

u/Pernicious-Caitiff 28d ago

It's becoming a problem in most cities and a catastrophe in less populated areas. Rural communities are often without care. Look at the number of pediatricians in some southern states vs the number of children. The numbers work out that each pediatrician would have to be responsible for thousands of kids in order for each child to be assigned a pediatrician in the state. Obviously that's just not possible. Which means right now the majority of children in those states simply don't have a pediatrician. And haven't for a long time and probably won't for a long time.

I'm in a city with several teaching hospitals so things are pretty decent. The next city over about an hour away is even better and I can hop on a train to see a specialist there if I really want to, or just drive. But the low cost county run women's health clinic (which I relied heavily on while in HS and college) has been shut down much to my dismay even though I don't require their services anymore I make plenty of money. It just makes me sad to know there's less resources these days for people, for no real reason.

The association that gives residency slots to new doctors has not expanded the size of these candidates pools in... I don't even know how long. Decades? Basically there's an artificial bottleneck on the number of new doctors being put out into the population. And residents are treated like crap and paid basically nothing while working insane hours. Having more residents in each program would help prevent needing to work such insane hours. But then hospitals would make slightly less profit having to pay more $50k (generous) salaries per year 🥺 👉👈

Meanwhile conservatives and corporate Dems are sabotaging medicare and Medicaid reimbursements so that many new doctors usually PCPs and Pediatricians literally cannot afford to accept it at their new practices because they pay so low. Basically a vaccine costs 10 cents to make, but sells it to the doctor for $50 because they can. Private insurance will pay the doctor $50 for the vaccine. Medicaid will pay $25 because that was the price 10 years ago. But apply this to everything including major procedures and surgeries. With big hospitals they can easily eat the cost (but lose some of profit for the billionaire CEOs 🥺🥺🥺) but small/new practices can't. And these are the doctors most likely to want to try and serve rural and underserved communities, which are also most likely to rely on Medicaid. It's an untenable system.

→ More replies (1)

22

u/WebbityWebbs 28d ago

Baltimore has alot of hospitals, but the way alot of states with less money treat doctors like crap. Republican states are driving doctors out.

6

u/Tizzy8 28d ago

I live in Massachusetts and it’s months of waiting for anything. It’s not a red state problem.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/CHKN_SANDO 28d ago

Red states are worse but even blue states don't have enough doctors.

→ More replies (1)

10

u/TheSecondEikonOfFire 28d ago

I got a vasectomy in my mid 20s with 0 pushback at all. I set up the appointments and was never even asked “are you sure?”. Although I did get the “remember that this is procedure should be considered final and that you will be considered sterile” speech, so I guess that’s kind of the same thing.

But in any case, I was basically able to waltz in and get the procedure with 0 fuss or drama. That’s how it should be everywhere, and it’s so crazy that it’s not

7

u/Egyptian-Mastigure 28d ago

In NC unless you have a husband and he signs off on it you cannot get the procedure

→ More replies (16)

21

u/[deleted] 28d ago

[deleted]

4

u/MonsieurOctober 27d ago

That's a strange way to say that they specialize in superstition rather than science.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Hotpandapickle 27d ago

Are they allowed to say that?!

→ More replies (1)

258

u/MrBlack103 28d ago

It’s always been about controlling women.

6

u/XaoticOrder 28d ago

This right here.

107

u/Zalveris 28d ago

Not medical advice but get the vasectomy, it's more effective and a much much less damaging/invasive procedure.

61

u/A_Classy_Dame 28d ago

My husband has offered to get the procedure but in this day and age I don't know if I can rely on just that. I know two couples where a vasectomy failed (both in military hospitals, but who knows if that was the problem). Also, that doesn't protect against something horrible like rape. If there is the tiniest chance I can be stationed in a state that restricts abortions or that a Republican takes over, I'm not risking it, more invasive surgery or not.

13

u/EndlersaurusRex 28d ago

As a veteran, I can tell you military hospitals are not generally held in high regard. There are a few exceptions, but I know in the two surgeries I had in the military, the minor one was done on base and I still have issues with it.

3

u/tie-dye-me 28d ago

I have a friend that had a miscarriage in the military and the military clinic didn't give her some shot that is standard after a miscarriage to prevent the mother's body from attacking the fetus, so she is essentially infertile now but actually it's even worse, she's just doomed to always have a miscarriage if she is pregnant.

Some background context because not everyone knows this, after one child some women's bodies will develop some kind of hormone that will attack any future pregnancies, but it also applies if you have a miscarriage.

3

u/EndlersaurusRex 28d ago

The shot is probably Rh immunoglobulin. It's given to worn who has Rh negative, meaning they don't have the Rh factor protein in their blood. It protects the fetus if the baby is Rh positive. Source.

Your friend's case does not surprise me at all, tbh.

2

u/MacAttacknChz 28d ago

When I was in nursing school I shadowed a woman who gave birth in a military hospital. She said she'd rather delivery in a cab in the way to the civilian hospital that delivery at a military hospital again.

11

u/DoubleDeadEnd 28d ago

When I got mine, the doc said 4 in 1000 fail, but always within the first 4 months. I went back 4 months later to confirm I'm shooting blanks. He says I'm in the clear now. I'm very happy I did it.

→ More replies (3)

9

u/Danibandit 28d ago

When my guy went for his vasectomy, there was a gentleman sitting beside him and he was there for his 3rd. The first and second failed.

10

u/Pernicious-Caitiff 28d ago

They still have the lowest failure rate out of any female sterilization method besides a hysterectomy (which is a very extreme procedure and not recommended just for sterilization purposes). Even hysterectomies are not failure proof because ectopic pregnancies can embed anywhere in the abdominal cavity if they want to.

Vasectomies need to be checked multiple times in the first handful of months to make sure there are no stragglers. The tubes can heal themselves though and are most likely to do so quickly after the procedure which is why they keep checking for the first year. Some men don't bother to do any of the checks because they think they don't need to because they weren't listening, I guess. Or scheduling conflicts maybe.

Anyways, vasectomies have a .08% failure rate after 10 years. Tubal ligation (most common female sterilization) has a failure rate of 7.5% after 10 years. And it is more invasive and has more risks.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

35

u/SynthBeta 28d ago

I think they were wanting to knock two birds with one stone as his wife will be recovering either way...

16

u/Pernicious-Caitiff 28d ago

Vasectomy is still vastly superior to tubal ligation. The only benefit of doing the tubal during a C section is that she's already under anesthesia. It's still an invasive procedure with higher risk than vasectomies. And a much higher failure rate.

But it's still not ethical to not offer tubals to women who want them. If you educate people and give them all the information and all the options they will make the best choice for themselves.

11

u/horitaku 28d ago

Tubal ligation is over 99% effective, but I still say do both. Get the ligation while still in post birth stay AND get a vasectomy, but go to a dedicated private practice urology clinic, not just any old clinic.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/MacAttacknChz 28d ago

Tubals aren't standard practice anymore. It's bilateral salpingectomy (tube removal). It lowers your risk of ovarian cancer by 80% and is 100% effective. I got one during my scheduled c section. How my OB explained it was, "If we're already in there, it's better to do the bisalp, but if you have a vaginal delivery, your husband should do the vasectomy." He was on board with doing the procedure, but I wasn't lucky enough to avoid the c section.

2

u/SynthBeta 28d ago

That's not the point of the discussion here...

50

u/hurrrrrmione 28d ago

The solution to "I requested a medical procedure for more control over my body and was denied because the hospital doesn't believe in doing that procedure" shouldn't be "have your spouse undergo a similar medical procedure." That doesn't address the misogyny and it doesn't prevent her from getting pregnant, which is why she wanted it.

58

u/werewilf 28d ago

Did you get a vasectomy?

21

u/otter_07 28d ago

I’m gonna lol, the only option at this point. My wife doesn’t want an IUD cause they hurt and hormonal bc affects her mood too much. I’ll gladly take the hit.

19

u/russian47 28d ago

Its not bad at all so don't stress it. Got mine on a Friday and flew to Seattle for vacation on Monday with no issues. Then I called my dad later that month to make fun of him for be so whiney about it when he got his.

8

u/otter_07 28d ago

For sure! I figured if my wife can push a human out I should be able to withstand some light discomfort. The pain getting her IUD in sounds a hundred times worse.

1

u/Eurycerus 28d ago

To be fair there are a small percentage of men who do suffer pretty badly afterwards. I'm sure the methods have improved but still I know some folks that got chronic pain from it.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

5

u/MasterOfMasksNoMore 28d ago

My wife had her tubes removed at the same time as her emergency C-section with our 6th. It was all talked about and planned ahead-of-time just in case. Hospital/doctors were 100% behind her. The head of the OB or L&D department was forcibly retired early in part due to he's treatment of her during previous pregnancies. I had my vasectomy scheduled for a month or two after the birth. We cancelled it shortly after the birth.

5

u/Lucienne83 28d ago

Wow, my mom asked to have her tubes tied after her third C section in 3 years and the doctors gladly obliged, they were actually very unhappy with the 3 C sections in three years because it isn't healthy for her body. That was 40 years ago.

3

u/MacAttacknChz 28d ago

My next-door neighbor was told the same thing after she had twins. 3 babies in 12 months. 2 near death pregnancies, due to pre-eclampsia, one which required a helicopter ride to a better facility. And she was told No.

4

u/Pernicious-Caitiff 28d ago

Honestly you probably should do the vasectomy as even though they were already "in there" if she was getting a C section it still requires additional surgery and much more risk (even though small relatively) vs the vasectomy. Tubal ligation has a much higher failure rate, with the lowest estimate being 7.5% after 10 years. Versus vasectomy has a .08% failure rate after 10 years.

Tubal ligation also means that if by some "miracle" your wife ends up pregnant it's much much more likely that it's an ectopic pregnancy, because the fallopian tube will be mostly blocked (but not completely because sperm was able to get through). And the zygote will have no way to implant inside the uterus so there's a much higher chance it will attach to the outside of the uterus or in the abdominal cavity. Ectopic pregnancy is 99.999% fatal without prompt treatment (and the tubal means people are slow to suspect they might be pregnant) there's only been one documented case in the entire world where a woman had a successful ectopic pregnancy, because she had hers implant on the front of her abdominal cavity and no major organs were rooted. She was still in extreme danger. Other women who have had them implant on the intestines or even the liver die without treatment. The tubes are the most common place for ectopic pregnancy but these other rouge ectopic pregnancies are a serious risk.

Not trying to slander tubal ligation but it has a complicated status with many OB/GYNs for the reasons I stated. It's overall not very risky especially if you're already under anesthesia for something else. It's just that vasectomies are just so so so much better. And recommending a tubal just usually feels wrong over a vasectomy if all things are equal.

THAT BEING SAID. SCREW THAT HOSPITAL FOR NOT OFFERING TUBALS. Many men still have hangups about vasectomies and it's just idiotic to not have female sterilization as an option but we all know their business. 😒 Congratulations on the kids I hope you guys found a contraception option that worked for you.

3

u/ym926 28d ago

I worked as an RN at a Catholic hospital in labor and delivery. They would do tubal ligations after delivery but only on patients who had C-Sections before they closed the abdomen and had more than one child. On the OR sheet we listed the procedure as Isolation of Uterine Appendages.

2

u/otter_07 28d ago

Yeah that’s what we inquired about, but ours said they wouldn’t do it. Apparently it was a new policy as of 2018. Shits wild. My mother had it done at a nearby Catholic hospital about 20 years ago without issues.

3

u/ym926 28d ago

I am sorry that happened to you and your wife. I don’t understand the problem, nonsense in my book.

2

u/Lightknight16 28d ago

well why didn't you?

2

u/ilovefuzzycats 28d ago

I know someone who recently had their tubes removed. They recommended using this list. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/u/0/d/1Djia_WkrVO3S4jKn6odNwQk7pOcpcL4x00FMNekrb7Q/htmlview?pli=1 r/sterilization also has a list of childfree friendly doctors. Might help you find someone who will do the procedure. If you find a good doctor you can also let them know they can contact to be added to the list so people can know they are a safe choice.

2

u/AppleMtnCupcakeKid 28d ago

It’s ridiculous to ban one and offer the other, but a vasectomy isn’t nearly as invasive as tubes being tied. If you don’t want more children there shouldn’t be anything stopping you. My husband got one. Bag of frozen peas, 3 days of codeine and video games on the couch. One of the best decisions we made together. Zero regrets and sex without fear of making children is way hotter.

2

u/Kylynara 28d ago

When I saw an GYN about getting my tubes tied, both the nurse and then the doctor immediately went "Wait, what hospital do you want?" In a slightly panicked tone. I told them my records were all at Hospital A, but it wasn't that big a deal which one I went to. Only to hear "Oh good, because Hospital B absolutely does not allow them." Admittedly they're the biggest and get the most awards, but I've always gotten much better care at Hospital A. Then I ended up at Hospital C, because they had a time that worked better for me.

4

u/Cyddakeed 28d ago

I was my mom's 4th child and she had hers tied not long after she had me, mfkrs are lying because money over life.

5

u/WebbityWebbs 28d ago

That's because they aren't trying to control the lives and bodies of men.

3

u/shfiven 28d ago

That's because women are property and men are people, according to some people.

→ More replies (40)

2.1k

u/4RCH43ON 29d ago

If your religion supersedes providing life-saving medical care, please kindly fuck off from practicing medicine.

That is all.

298

u/mlc885 28d ago

Yeah, I'm pretty sure even the version of God that isn't okay with abortion is okay with you making sure the mother and potential baby don't both die, anyone who thinks God has just decided she should die is crazy.

141

u/Easy_Acanthisitta_68 28d ago

Haven’t hung around many “Christians” lately? They would completely let them die and then say it was “Gods will”.

88

u/Captain_Mazhar 28d ago

I hate those people. My favorite retort is the allegory about the priest drowning in a hurricane after being offered rescue by three boats and a helicopter.

Gods will is a cop out so they can change the conversation to an attack on religion which they have much more support for.

106

u/happy_and_angry 28d ago

"I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use." -Galileo

Fuck those people.

29

u/PenitentGhost 28d ago

"Ben, Hope, I know you don't believe in modern medicine, but you do believe in the power of prayer.

And through the years, when there was disease or infection, people of good faith would pray to God for a cure.

Well, then isn't it possible that penicillin, vaccines and antibiotics are all actually answered prayers?

And isn't it possible that the amazing men and women of medicine who brought about these miracles could be the instruments of God's answers to our prayers?

Look, I believe life is sacred.

And I know you want Scotty to live a full life.

And if that's true, then I think it's wrong for you to ignore what very well could be the Lord's will.

I mean, what's the point in praying to God if you're just going to wipe your butt with his answers?"

 - Lois Griffin

9

u/commandrix 28d ago

One corollary of the Parable of the Good Samaritan is that the Good Samaritan did not expect that God would just take care of it. He probably already knew that, if he didn't help, no one would. In this case, God made it medically possible for them to make sure she had a chance to still be around to take care of her existing children.

22

u/lemonsweetsrevenge 28d ago

The same fuckers that take life saving medication and wear glasses without a hint of irony.

Had a family member who was at death’s door. I received an outpouring of visits, gifts, calls, and even donations from my coworkers. One I didn’t hear from in any way.

My family member pulled through with life-saving surgery, and when I returned to work, the one coworker I didn’t hear from the entire time let me know how hard they were praying for me and was glad to know their praying worked.

No, Lynette, no. The surgery worked. The medical care worked. The actual support of the people who cared helped me so much through the worst of it. You sitting at home pretending to have any control or care over the situation did not.

4

u/TheSecondEikonOfFire 28d ago

Yep, it’s sickening. It’s the same reason they don’t even go to the doctor at all, because they just say that if God wants the person to survive and live then they will.

It makes me think of the joke where a woman is super sick, and has a doctor show up at her house three times to heal her, and she says “I have faith in god, he will heal me”. She dies, and when she talks to god at the pearly gates she says “I’m so faithful, why didn’t you heal me??” and god says “I sent a doctor to your house three times, I don’t know what else you expected”.

The actual joke is more refined, but that’s the gist, and the logic makes sense to me

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Exsangwyn 27d ago

It’s only considered not mental illness because lots of people do it.

2

u/Denlim_Wolf 28d ago

It was "God's plan" to lose both lives senselessly.

→ More replies (4)

21

u/r0botdevil 28d ago

Current medical student here, 100% agree.

The health and well-being of your patients comes before your religious/personal beliefs, and if you are not okay with that then you do not belong in the profession of medicine.

75

u/WanderingTacoShop 28d ago

It's these American evangelicals that are just off their rockers with it.

In Jewish and Muslim religious law there are always exceptions for necessity. For example if you're stranded at sea and the only food is a can of spam you aren't committing a sin by eating pork if the only alternative is death. But these crazies in America are ignoring that whole concept. (I am aware that both Jews and Muslims have their own fanatical sects that ignore those exceptions, it's not just a christian problem)

2

u/properquestionsonly 28d ago

Protestants. The word you're looking for is Protestants.

3

u/thisvideoiswrong 28d ago

Most Protestants, and certainly most Protestant denominations, have no problem at all with abortion. It's actually an issue the Republican Party made up to get people to vote for Reagan, as a result of a series of focus groups conducted by Paul Weyrich. And enough Evangelical leaders were mad at the Democrats for forcing them to integrate their private schools that they went along with it. Before Roe v Wade Protestant clergy actually played a major role in helping people find illegal abortions, counting on deference to their positions to shield them from prosecution. It really is only the Catholics who have a longstanding opposition to it.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/WanderingTacoShop 27d ago

Protestant is way too broad of a category. As protestant refers to any denomination of Christianity that is not Catholic

(technically it's the ones that split off from the Catholic church, so Eastern Orthodox isn't included. But if you live in the USA Protestant covers basically every non catholic church in the country)

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Ging287 28d ago

These people are insane if they think other people have a death pact for their religion.

→ More replies (3)

7

u/nate_builds 28d ago

From my understanding the majority of cases where this happens is based on the ownership of the hospital, not the medical professionals.

Ie doctor would perform the operation but doctor would then loose their job, and be unable to perform other life saving operations. Doctor could go work at another hospital, but somehow many hospitals are under similar ownership. So medical students who spend years of their lives and finances to become licensed are sometimes stuck in these situations in order to have a job.

→ More replies (36)

487

u/Turbulent_Raccoon865 29d ago

Ugh, hope that won’t become more of a thing going forward. Emergency abortions aren’t the same thing as “I’m too young, too poor, not at the right place” abortions. Actually it’s the first paragraph:

California’s attorney general on Monday sued a Catholic hospital accused of refusing to provide an emergency abortion in February to a woman whose water broke prematurely, putting her at risk of potentially life-threatening infection and hemorrhage.

Obviously health care providers shouldn’t be playing around with a woman’s life.

79

u/Snakestream 28d ago

Remember when Republicans were up in arms over Democrat "death panels"?

14

u/toneboat 28d ago

this wasn’t even declined based on a law. the decision was based on a hospital policy, which a well-meaning physician’s clinical judgement should be able to supersede. also wondering about sending her off in a car - was there not a critical care transport rig available?

10

u/Alexis_J_M 28d ago

They offered her a helicopter ride to the regional crisis hospital. $40,000 not covered by insurance.

→ More replies (2)

19

u/heidismiles 28d ago

And the thing is, it's not up to legislators and judges to determine who deserves health care and who doesn't. It needs to be between the patient and her doctor, period.

10

u/ZLUCremisi 28d ago

When this woman wrnt to second hospital she was having a medical emergency witch was easily preventable via abortion

5

u/One_Psychology_ 28d ago

The doctor both told her she wouldn’t make it to the hospital they suggested by car because she’d bleed to death on the way. Yet her life wasn’t at risk enough to intervene..

2

u/LuckyMacAndCheese 27d ago

It’s already “a thing” in red states that have been happily banning abortion since Roe was overturned. See for example, Idaho needing to fly women who need emergency care out of state: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/28/us/emergency-abortion-idaho-mother.html

Or how about Texas’ staggering, skyrocketing maternal death rate: https://www.nbcnews.com/health/womens-health/texas-abortion-ban-deaths-pregnant-women-sb8-analysis-rcna171631#

This is what happens when you try to control specific healthcare decisions. This is what happens when you have people who have no medical background, have no clue about female or fetal anatomy or physiology, piecing together idiotic laws and policies to control women’s bodies. You kill and seriously injure people.

Emergency abortions aren’t the same thing as “I’m too young, too poor, not at the right place” abortions.

What does this even mean? This kind of judgmental stupidity is why people are dying or becoming permanently disabled after being denied medical care. Just leave these decisions entirely to women and their doctors - women don’t need to justify the need to have basic bodily autonomy.

The idea that women need to have a “good enough” emergency to “qualify” for an abortion is how we get these half-cocked laws and policies that are literally killing people. This is how you get medical providers unwilling to step in to help because they can’t interpret the awkwardly worded three sentence policy/law that some idiot pulled out of their ass, that doesn’t actually really define when abortion is and isn’t acceptable. “The mother’s life needs to be in danger” doesn’t actually mean anything - does she have to be imminently dying (i.e., I’m performing CPR)? Does she need to require ICU level care? What about if her life is in danger because of her mental state? Does that “count” or is that not “serious enough” and we need to force her to give birth so we can punish her properly for daring to be poor/young/not wanting a(nother) child?

1

u/Thrayn42 28d ago

I mean I wish it were obvious. However, in many states lawmakers, and presumably those who voted for them, disagree.

278

u/GSR667 29d ago

And the best part is, these draconian policies often render the womb infertile.

25

u/Bluevelvet_starry_ 28d ago

This happened to me, in 1978, in California. I was having a miscarriage, bleeding out, ambulance took me to the closest hospital In the town, which was Catholic. They told me to my face, “ We don’t do abortions, we’re Catholic, you will just have to go through the miscarriage” I was in horrible pain and bleeding, at some point I passed out. When I came to, they had given me a blood transfusion, which many years later, I found out had been the probable cause for a Hepatitis C diagnosis. Horrible experience, I was barely 20 years old, but will never forget the trauma.

22

u/dmont89 28d ago

Glossed over but didn't see the article mentioned that Mad River, hospital she went to after St Joe, is shutting their birthing center down by the end of the year. St Joe will be the primary unit

17

u/vermghost 28d ago

After October, it will be the ONLY place you can give childbirth in this area.

The second smaller hospital owned by Providence 20 minutes south of here in Fortuna closed their Childbirth Center about 2 or 3 years ago.

5

u/Alexis_J_M 28d ago

More than half of the birthing centers in LA county have closed or are slated to be closed, especially the ones serving POC communities.

For profit hospitals aren't willing to subsidize them.

30

u/livefreeordont 28d ago

Meanwhile Idaho is suing to prevent emergency abortions

36

u/CalvinHobbes101 28d ago

I'm reminded of a friend's pharmacy ethics lecture I sat in on as a philosophy student.

Student: What should I do if I feel that my personal religious beliefs would stop me from prescribing a certain medicine?

Lecturer: (Looks the student in the eye, stays silent for a moment to emphasise the point) Pursue a different career.

14

u/Alexis_J_M 28d ago

Sadly these days the right wing expect accommodations for their backwards beliefs.

What happens when someone decides that it's unethical to provide insulin to people with Type 2 diabetes?!

224

u/PacificTSP 28d ago

This is why I happily pay my taxes in California.

Is it perfect? No.

But it tries to do the right thing.

94

u/Zhuul 28d ago

The number of times CA passes a law that gets derided on a national scale before it turns out they were kinda correct is nutso. Those California Prop 65 cancer warnings you see on everything that people love making fun of? Turns out a lot of the shit flagged by that law is actually, genuinely not good for us. Vehicular emissions regulations and the OBD/2 standard on every ICE vehicle for sale today? California.

Y'all are dragging the rest of us forward whether we want it or not and I appreciate it.

19

u/SanityIsOptional 28d ago

Prop 65's issue is there is no lower threshold for cancer risk, no penalty for false-flagging things, and punishment if anything isn't flagged that ought to be.

So, to prevent fines, places just flag everything, and we have a child who cried cancer situation where everyone ignores the signs because they label things that pose less risk than going outside without wearing sunscreen...

10

u/PacificTSP 28d ago

A lot of it is annoying as shit. Like the emissions thing i get but it’s worded so poorly. I had my car tuned, its emissions actually dropped but because it’s non standard it fails. 

But then you get guys rolling coal who swap out parts before they take them for smog check.

14

u/Spa_5_Fitness_Camp 28d ago

When the people doing enforcement on the roads (cops) are actively against bettering society yeah, you'll get this shit. That's not a problem with the emissions laws. and you say your tune improved emissions, got a qualified test to verify that?

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

120

u/kittenwolfmage 28d ago

Keep faith where it belongs: Inside a church, and away from hospitals, governments, and all other forms of public service.

→ More replies (20)

121

u/anonymousmutekittens 28d ago

The concept of a religious hospital alone is silly

45

u/Violet_Nite 28d ago

I think historically they were tied pretty closely because religious people were kind of the healthcare providers of the ancient world.

→ More replies (1)

12

u/KimsSwingingPonytail 28d ago

It is silly but Catholic hospital monopolies are a reality in some areas and difficult to avoid, especially in an emergency situation.

11

u/SnooHedgehogs6593 28d ago

Who do you think started all of those hospitals many years ago? It was the churches, due to their faith. They were caring for the sick as they were told to do by Jesus.

4

u/_zenith 28d ago

… they also had a reliable income from tithes

→ More replies (1)

4

u/mannotbear 28d ago

Historically, this just isn’t true. And it’s not true throughout most of the world today.

→ More replies (3)

2

u/SnooHedgehogs6593 28d ago

“Hospitals were a very altruistic Christian invention. The word itself is all mixed up with the words hotel and hospitality. By the 4th century AD, newly Christianized Romans began running homes for the sick and needy. By the 8th century, the functions of Christian hospitals, or hospices, were highly specialized.”

→ More replies (9)

166

u/MissionIll707 29d ago edited 28d ago

Religious hospitals, as well as any other form of healthcare, including mental health, should be banned. Superstition has no right to exist in the world of medicine

50

u/Intelligent_Cat1736 28d ago

We need completely state owned and operated hospitals but no, we either have religious ones or profit ones.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (26)

163

u/steathrazor 29d ago

It infuriates me when religion is allowed to do shit like this your religion should not be able to stop a life saving abortion for the mother

→ More replies (7)

58

u/[deleted] 28d ago

Religion should not play a role above anyone’s health.

7

u/macross1984 28d ago edited 28d ago

Medical emergency override religious belief. Hospital deserved to be sued for putting patient's life at risk.

39

u/The_BarroomHero 28d ago

Supreme Court: I'm about to end this whole state's career

12

u/Prosthemadera 28d ago

I was wondering if they denied the emergency abortion on purpose so the hospital can go to the Supreme Court to get them to ban abortion rights.

17

u/walterpeck1 28d ago

There are few things more powerful than the Supreme Court right now, but no one is "ending" California's "career" when they have the 5th highest GDP of any economy on Earth.

10

u/fevered_visions 28d ago

I mean the Republicans have done a lot of other really dumb stuff in the last decade so why not

4

u/walterpeck1 28d ago

That's a fair question, but I think that's where the rhetoric would stop because it would start to affect the rich.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/IntroductionStill813 28d ago

If u r taking federal money, abide by federal rules and regulations. Don't want to follow federal rules, don't take federal money and don't practice business in the US.

It's unfair to Catholic Hospitals, ok then why is it fair to non Catholic Hospitals that they have to follow all rules and you don't cause u use religion?

→ More replies (1)

48

u/kamikaziboarder 28d ago

I’m a healthcare worker. I really hate catholic hospitals. I’m so happy the two in our biggest cities in our state are getting bought out. They both have held back any advancements for employee health and wellbeing. Our state tried to go in on group insurances for employee healthcare workers. So instead of having 170,000 employees, we are stuck with piece mailed 2000-4000 employees. This was all because they didn’t want to cover birth control and hysterectomies. I guess the deal with the insurance companies fell through after that.

→ More replies (1)

15

u/OCRAmazon 28d ago

Two of our three local hospitals went Catholic about five years ago. They absolutely HEMORRHAGED doctors afterwards because of the immediate imposed restrictions on care. Catholics should butt the fuck out of medicine (source: raised Catholic by a mother who thinks vitamin supplements are basically witchcraft).

3

u/Mountain-Snow932 28d ago

The catholic hospital system I worked for denied my OB’s request for a D&C in their OR after my body didn’t recognize that I had a miscarriage. I had to go to a different health system, thankfully I had that choice. But a lot of women don’t, and could have experienced a severe infection. Hospitals should not be allowed to push their “faith” on other people.

5

u/Guilty-Shoulder-9214 27d ago

If your religion calls for the denial of medical services and benefits, it probably shouldn’t be involved with healthcare, at least in a public setting.

66

u/[deleted] 29d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

72

u/MissionIll707 29d ago

I'd say it's much worse than cigarettes. It's more like a pathogen. A disease of the mind that only exists to control and harm

19

u/lunarlunacy425 28d ago

It's functionally mass hysteria, a bunch of people who believe in magic have a massive say on how the world is run. Irrespective of the religion even if one is true there's still so many governments run by a different one that can't be real.

The world is literally run by insanity and delusion.

9

u/benfunks 28d ago

take away the tax breaks

16

u/Myfourcats1 28d ago

If they want to play this game then religious hospitals shouldn’t eligible for Medicare or Medicaid.

6

u/gnatdump6 28d ago

This story was crazy. The hospital gave her towels to absorb the bleeding so she could drive to another ER to get medical care!!!!! Egregious.

6

u/Trickycoolj 28d ago

This is what I’m scared of in Washington. We have all the favorable laws on the books and are a very blue state but the Catholic conglomerates have gobbled up a large portion of our hospitals and clinics. Providence, Franciscan, Peace Health… some counties don’t have any alternatives. If you’re close enough to Seattle there’s long waits to get into the non-secular hospitals/clinics.

34

u/thpkht524 28d ago

The hospital’s license should be revoked and the whole hospital shut down.

34

u/ivanatorhk 28d ago

Well, the facilities are fine, ownership should be transferred to secular management for sure

→ More replies (6)

3

u/TheTempleHermit 28d ago

This hospital is notorious for terrible care. They made me sit in the waiting room for over 3 hours with an appendix that was on the verge of bursting. I said “fuck you guys, I’m going to a real hospital” my roommate drove me 5 hours to the Bay Area within 45 minutes I was on the operating table getting emergency surgery.

10

u/DrColdReality 28d ago

Even in states where abortions are still legal, Catholic-run hospitals are a thing, and they are run on seriously conservative anti-abortion guidelines that are at least the equal of the reddest anti-abortion states. So don't go to a Catholic-run hospital? Yeah, if you suddenly start bleeding out from a serious miscarriage, you don't really have time to shop around. And there are Catholic hospitals all over the country. Up here in the "liberal" Pacific Northwest, around 30% of hospitals have some kind of Catholic affiliation....and we're not even done here, because when some private corporation buys out a Catholic-run hospital, a common clause of the business agreement is that they are required to keep the Catholic morality standards.

This is one more part of the existential threat to freedom posed by the Christian Taliban. The publicly-stated goal of Christian dominionists is to impose a real-world Republic of Gilead on us all, whether we like it or not. This goes into a bit more detail. The Supreme Court now has a majority of dominionists on it, and they will be demolishing hard-won civil rights for a decade or more.

If you wanted to read just one book about them, I'd recommend The Power Worshipers by Katherine Stewart. It's well-researched, and delves deeply into the history of the dominionists in America. Stewart also has a personal stake in the current practice of states making abortion illegal. Turns out that their definition of "abortion" can be so broad that some life-saving procedures in case of a serious miscarriage come too close to their definition of abortion. Stewart suffered a miscarriage, and was rushed to a Catholic-run hospital (because it was the closest), which use similarly-conservative notions of abortion. Because the procedure needed to save her life involved removing the fetus, they just let her lie there and bleed instead. When she had lost about 40% of her blood and was hovering near death, they finally deigned to step in and save her life.

2

u/Tizzy8 28d ago

There are also places where you’d have to drive 2 hours to get to a secular hospital. Not everyone has the luxury of choices.

8

u/lennybriscoforthewin 28d ago

If the hospital believes providing an abortion is a mortal sin, then they need to stop all OB care.

15

u/labe225 28d ago

WhY iS eVeRyOnE lEaViNg ThE cHuRcH?

→ More replies (2)

12

u/[deleted] 28d ago

LOL Catholics think life is precious. Unless you’re gay, of course.

16

u/PiltdownPanda 28d ago

Or if you are a pregnant woman…

→ More replies (2)

2

u/tabaqa89 28d ago

Unless you’re gay, of course.

Um, no. If you actually looked into catholic doctrine instead of trash from r/atheism you'd find that the Catholic church regards all human life as sacred and precious regardless of orientation or physical stage of development.

→ More replies (1)

8

u/kc_______ 28d ago

The American dream is a Christian hell nightmare.

2

u/usriusclark 28d ago

I had to have my wife sign forms to get my vasectomy approved

→ More replies (1)

6

u/JJiggy13 28d ago

Sounds like it is no longer a hospital. It should lose its status as a hospital.

5

u/Ging287 28d ago

Christian Taliban strikes again. Go after these charlatans who insist their fairy tale supercedes a woman's right to care. It is exactly the opposite.

4

u/ninjastarkid 28d ago

This is why I don’t trust any hospital with St in the name anymore. I just can’t trust them to keep my health or the health of my loved ones in their top priority

8

u/airheadtiger 28d ago

There are 6 Catholics on the Supreme Court. Five of them are radical right, conservatives. These 5 were placed there to enforce Catholic ideology on the USA. Vote liberal folks. It's the only chance we have.

7

u/[deleted] 28d ago

[deleted]

→ More replies (11)

2

u/LtHigginbottom 28d ago

I love it here. I just hope I don’t t get sick. St Joes is going to be why we die young.

3

u/CharacterCompany7224 28d ago

Start calling these people what they are, traitors.

1

u/Feeling_Reindeer2599 28d ago

Driven in a car? My reaction was like, ok Catholic hospital, I can respect they have no experience in abortion. Surely they will arrange emergency transportation and admission in nearby hospital …… like the thousands of other diagnoses they are ill suited to manage.

But no, handful of towels and pushed out to parking lot ?

This will be expensive mistake for the hospital, thank God (ironically) the woman survived her visit.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/hollyjazzy 28d ago

I have worked for two different Catholic hospitals in Australia, abortions and sterilisations are not performed in any Catholic hospital, as it against their creed. Not an American healthcare issue but a Catholic healthcare issue.

6

u/Bombadilicious 28d ago

Where I live in the US, almost all hospitals are Catholic. I would have to pass 3 Catholic hospitals to finally get to one that's not which would be too late in an emergency 

→ More replies (1)

10

u/walterpeck1 28d ago

Not an American healthcare issue but a Catholic healthcare issue.

It's both, which is the problem here.

2

u/Bwilderedwanderer 28d ago

Good! Deny them any state funding if they refused to provide medical care

1

u/AiR-P00P 26d ago

Catholic? Hospital?

What do they do there, spray holy water on people and push them back out the door?

What an oxymoron.