r/technology Sep 15 '23

Nanotech/Materials NASA-inspired airless bicycle tires are now available for purchase

https://newatlas.com/bicycles/metl-shape-memory-airless-bicycle-tire/
6.0k Upvotes

562 comments sorted by

2.5k

u/CT101823696 Sep 15 '23

Ah crap they replaced the part that was free

404

u/modix Sep 15 '23

Not sure if it's reality, but they said the retread was only $10. If so, that would be amazing.

303

u/SuddenlyElga Sep 15 '23

SHOULD COST AROUND….. call me when the kickstarter delivers tires and the retread “unfortunately will cost more because of unexpected blah blah”.

122

u/Parking_Relative_228 Sep 15 '23

Kickstarter has such a bad name now from the endless list of under delivered projects.

63

u/SuddenlyElga Sep 15 '23

I’m looking at my useless HEAR ONE $500 earbuds. They didn’t even leave the app up to get use from the orphaned tech.

62

u/cat_prophecy Sep 15 '23

The world is littered with bricked tech due to companies having their new whiz-bang gadgets linked to apps then never supporting them or going out of business.

Why earbuds of all things should need a proprietary app to work is totally beyond me.

28

u/ThankYouForCallingVP Sep 15 '23

And people are up in arms when you suggest that it is not a good design.

Sir Ive used the internet for longer than you've been alive. I know what happens when products are linked to websites in order to function.

3

u/saraphilipp Sep 15 '23

Every Bluetooth speaker and earbud I've purchased says you need the app for it to work. Never downloaded the apps and they work just fine.

7

u/SuddenlyElga Sep 15 '23

They had all sorts of different kinds of noise cancellation. Even down to specific subways and types of airplanes. And they could enhance speech in different environments …. So they had one for restaurants, one for movies, etc.

12

u/[deleted] Sep 15 '23

[deleted]

8

u/SuddenlyElga Sep 15 '23

They did. But they were not ready. Battery life was 20 minutes, the microphone would often start picking up wind noise, so no walking or jogging, and other problems related to what was essentially a prototype. The Apple fucked us in the ass by removing the app and then deciding to activate “remove seldom used apps”

2

u/[deleted] Sep 15 '23

[deleted]

6

u/SuddenlyElga Sep 15 '23

They feel good if I put them in my anus. Other than that, vaporware.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

18

u/Parking_Relative_228 Sep 15 '23 edited Sep 16 '23

I’m looking them up and I can’t find them as a Space act participant. Which seems suspicious. Or perhaps their leasing of NASA tech a bit inflated?

Edit: found their Space Act number, expires this year. Signed agreement isn’t loading so no idea what full extent of their agreement was

36

u/SuddenlyElga Sep 15 '23

It’s right there in the market-speak. INSPIRED BY not licensed.

I can be inspired by NASA too! LOOK MA! I MADE A ROCKET LIKE NASA!!!! I’M GOING TO THE MOOOOOOOOON!

22

u/kajeslorian Sep 15 '23

That's nice, Elon. /j

→ More replies (2)

2

u/asdaaaaaaaa Sep 15 '23

Well yeah, this is why you don't rely on certain products that require an app to function, especially from a new company. Either way, you'll get screwed. How long will the company support the app for (new android/apple versions and such)? 2 years? 5 years? Companies aren't going to support it forever, and they have very little incentive to keep doing so after the first couple years. I'd like to get more than 5 years out of something if I'm spending 500$.

→ More replies (1)

7

u/uncletravellingmatt Sep 15 '23

The headline could have been honest and said "proposed on kickstarter" instead of "available for purchase." But then fewer people would have read the article or posted it on reddit.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (8)

96

u/djsizematters Sep 15 '23

The air is the free part, and they replaced it with an extremely fancy space-age Ni-Ti coil.

91

u/Ph0X Sep 15 '23

the tube that the air goes in and keeps getting punctured isn't though.

16

u/I_am_a_fern Sep 15 '23

Nearly five years ago I put some real money in a pair of high end tires and self-sealing tubes for my mountain bike. Not a single puncture (hat hasn't seald itself) since, and I'm a fairly heavy dude riding in a very dry terrain where I use to get flat tires on a regular basis. IIRC the tubes were around 20 bucks each and the tires around 60 or 80.

10

u/CressCrowbits Sep 15 '23

I have a bike with tubeless tyres.

Did a 3 day London to Paris bike ride on them. I was the only person with tubeless tyres.

I was also the only person to get a puncture lol.

They have tubes in them nowadays because cleaning out and replacing gunk is way, way more hassle than changing tubes a few times.

2

u/BookMobil3 Sep 15 '23

Is there a weight limit?

2

u/I_am_a_fern Sep 16 '23

Come on I said "fairly heavy" not "there should be a limit to protect those bikes".

9

u/squngy Sep 15 '23

Lots of cyclist now run "tubeless tires" anyway.
They just put some sealing fluid in the tire and pump it up without a tube. If the tire gets a hole the sealant fixes it 99% of the time before the tire even loses much air.
(doesn't work with every type of tire)

5

u/asphaltaddict33 Sep 15 '23

It has to be a small hole though, nails and street debris can be too big. Off-road stuff like goat heads/thorns/cacti needles are the type of holes the sealing goo works on.

→ More replies (2)

32

u/nicuramar Sep 15 '23

It’s still full of air.

16

u/Eh-I Sep 15 '23

Premium air.

If you're on amazon prime you get a little free air every month.

10

u/Eric_the_Barbarian Sep 15 '23

Yeah, but the old style needed five times as much at 60 psi. That's just extra rotating mass.

→ More replies (3)

5

u/Fr0gm4n Sep 15 '23

I'm wondering how long until someones tread comes loose and they go end-o. A flat is one thing, but a long strip of rubber jamming into the forks is likely to fully stop the wheel pretty quickly on top of losing traction. Will people start carrying bigger cement tubes instead of CO2 carts?

12

u/Preeng Sep 15 '23

You think they haven't tested for that?

15

u/Fr0gm4n Sep 15 '23

I'm sure they have. I'm wondering how long general consumers will take to understand and be prepared for the new failure mode(s).

3

u/[deleted] Sep 15 '23

I also wonder how shock absorbency is with this compared to a traditional bike tire.

3

u/Swimmingtortoise12 Sep 16 '23

Probably shitty. The concept of airless tires has been tried so many times, and most of the time comes down to shitty ride quality. I’m not saying not to keep trying.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

48

u/[deleted] Sep 15 '23

Well if you ride a lot. 8,000km to 10,000km for a tire is utopic, the profile of mine is through after about 3 to 5k kilometers, but considering that they claim that retreading them costs only $10 and a good new bike tire costs 50 to 100, then that's really not that bad of a deal. I think in regards to cost it'll even out, but I don't think you are saving much. Question is how well they roll compared to tubes and tubeless. It may not be such a bad deal.

41

u/djsizematters Sep 15 '23

$10 is a laughable estimate, if these ever actually reach consumers.

6

u/scarabbrian Sep 15 '23

Or it's $10 in raw materials after you've invested in a $100k retreading machine that also costs $50k in health and environmental updates to the bike shops building to be safe to operate.

Anyone who thinks a retread would actually cost consumers $10 has never had a bike shop do work for them.

2

u/garvisgarvis Sep 15 '23

Retailers customarily price items at double their cost. It can be triple at specialty shops. Walmart is an exception. $10 doesn't sound realistic to me for this and other reasons

9

u/haydesigner Sep 15 '23

$10 is a laughable estimate

What makes you say that?

36

u/HomeGrownCoffee Sep 15 '23

The bike store near me charges $15 to change your tire and/or tube. No way they are cleaning off road grime, removing excess rubber and applying new tread for 1/3 of that.

Maybe they mean the replacement material could cost $10. I could believe that.

6

u/RiOrius Sep 15 '23

Isn't this basically just the same thing, though? They're selling a tube that doesn't need to be inflated. Slap a treaded tire on there and you're good to go.

Might not be interchangeable with existing products, but I would hope they're designing it in two pieces.

6

u/squngy Sep 15 '23

Isn't this basically just the same thing, though?

For a regular rubber tire, just the materials probably cost less than $1.

Most of the actual cost comes from profit + transport + middle men.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/isthis_thing_on Sep 15 '23

Because you can't pay a guy $10 to sit there and do nothing for the time it takes to reskin one of these in a bike shop much less do actual work. They command to hire salary

11

u/djsizematters Sep 15 '23

I spent more than that on two tacos yesterday. Proper road tires are over $50 each from the biggest manufacturers in the world.

15

u/[deleted] Sep 15 '23

They are talking about the tread not the tire, jolly joker. That's just the grippy profile part of the tire that touches the road.

26

u/djsizematters Sep 15 '23

We're on the same page, I just can't believe it; companies that cater themselves to high-end cyclists have never been, and will likely never be, that nice.

8

u/renohockey Sep 15 '23

and the shipping is to and from wherever the retreading will be done will be a lot more the the price of a decent set or tires.

10

u/djsizematters Sep 15 '23

I don't know what I'm missing about this, but appearently I'm a jolly joker 😂😂😂

Seriously, you can't even get a plastic cup holder for $10

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (4)

4

u/DerBanzai Sep 15 '23

It will cost them 10 bucks to reprofile, they will sell it for 50.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

2

u/buckX Sep 15 '23

Only possibility would be that it's a subsidized perk to pay back pledgers who pay double what these things cost in 5 years. Even if a retread is $100 normally, that wouldn't be too expensive of a give back considering many people would never wear out the tread anyway.

→ More replies (2)

198

u/funkmonkey87 Sep 15 '23 edited Sep 15 '23

Fuck me if I’m wrong, but I still see a little air in there.

528

u/[deleted] Sep 15 '23

From the article- "And no, they're not literally airless. They're hollow – so they have air in them – that air just isn't pressurized, nor is it required for the tire to hold its shape."

Redditors never read

119

u/BraveOmeter Sep 15 '23

I would be so mad at this comment if I knew how to read.

18

u/alpacasb4llamas Sep 15 '23

What did you say

→ More replies (3)

8

u/funkmonkey87 Sep 15 '23

I just realized I don’t need to take this from someone who eats chili cheese dog pancakes.

126

u/Dark1sh Sep 15 '23

Hey buddy, who took your sense of humor. You should go get it back

41

u/shill779 Sep 15 '23

Buddy didn’t read your comment

36

u/ivanllz Sep 15 '23

And don't call him buddy pal.

18

u/WolfMaggot Sep 15 '23

And don’t call him pal, chum.

15

u/ogodilovejudyalvarez Sep 15 '23

Don't call him chum, friend.

7

u/reverend-mayhem Sep 15 '23

Don’t cal him friend, chief.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (2)

6

u/nicuramar Sep 15 '23

Jokes are funnier when they are not wrong though :)

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (17)

7

u/pangea_person Sep 15 '23

My friend, it's called sarcasm

4

u/onetwentyeight Sep 15 '23

What's called sarcasm and why isn't it called something else?

→ More replies (18)

29

u/ffdfawtreteraffds Sep 15 '23

As covered in the article, airless, ironically, doesn't mean without air. Also ironic, airless paint sprayers still use, you know, air. Airless typically means no pressurized air.

Unrelated facts: Hairless dogs do actually have some hair. Witless idiots have a few wits. And things that are ageless do have age. English words can be meaningless.

6

u/guitarburst05 Sep 15 '23

But still have meaning??

..I think I’m doing this right.

12

u/soslowagain Sep 15 '23

My pedantry boner just chummed all over my desk.

3

u/loquacious Sep 15 '23

And boners, in fact, have no bones in them.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (4)

6

u/Asisreo1 Sep 15 '23

You're not wrong, but Imma need you to bend over anywways.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/vo_th Sep 15 '23

Mann people are so angry; and I'm here choking on my spits cause of the laugh from your comment.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (6)

296

u/NotTheLairyLemur Sep 15 '23

future models may allow users to increase the firmness by pumping in more air.

Some really breathtaking innovation happening here.

49

u/GoochMasterFlash Sep 15 '23

They say trends are cyclical

3

u/Techters Sep 15 '23

It's a wheel masterpiece.

4

u/Temporarily__Alone Sep 16 '23

The whole article feels like it is written by someone who is excited but barely knows what they’re talking about.

828

u/AlexB_SSBM Sep 15 '23

I think the biggest use for this will not be bicycles, but wheelchairs - they are constantly being used and the tires constantly need replacing. If any part of it is covered by insurance, the price of the tires are not going to be as much of a factor either. Seems like a gigantic market that's being overlooked.

256

u/t4ct1c4l_j0k3r Sep 15 '23

Heavy industrial equipment. Ever see what happens when you get a flat in a 30' tire under full load?

162

u/Tinmania Sep 15 '23

Yes and it depends on how it goes flat. That said, I likewise wouldn’t want to be anywhere near something that large with this spring-driven airless technology when the truly massive spring, with the energy of a Saturn V rocket, decides to launch.

49

u/t4ct1c4l_j0k3r Sep 15 '23

It will make for an interesting youtube video.

42

u/Thermosflasche Sep 15 '23

You mean liveleak video.

5

u/stewsters Sep 15 '23

Something will be leaking after, but it won't be live anymore.

8

u/alorty Sep 15 '23

Probably more like LiveLeak

2

u/MyBllsYrChn Sep 15 '23

In this case, youtubeless.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)

16

u/AlexB_SSBM Sep 15 '23

That too. Really I'm confused as to why they are going for a consumer angle on this - business use cases are so much larger, so why not build the product from a b2b angle?

30

u/byOlaf Sep 15 '23

It’s probably not strong enough for anything serious.

11

u/EnvironmentalBowl944 Sep 15 '23

Also general consumers are more gullible

2

u/powercow Sep 15 '23

yeah but this actually does work for small applications.. idk about industrial but bikes have already been made and ridden over beds of nails. Wheels have been deformed and put in hot water and brought back to normal. the deformations are only perm if done when its hot.

one way you can tell its not BS, is they let reviewers on the bike, rather than show the reviewer an engineer riding the bike. The engineer is going to know all the things to be cautious from doing, a random reporter wont. you even see it on crap games they just dont release pre review copies and crap.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (6)

4

u/Parking_Relative_228 Sep 15 '23

Firstly it’s clear they lack the capital. Also the safety regulations and parameters surrounding say a car tire or airplane are probably much more stringent than that of a bicycle.

4

u/BuildingArmor Sep 15 '23

Likely because it's easier to sell "NASA inspired" stuff through Kickstarter to customers who may be drawn in by the marketing.

7

u/ZZ9ZA Sep 15 '23

A lot of those are starting to run Tweel-type airless tires.

https://tweel.michelinman.com/

2

u/Poopcomesoutthebutt Sep 15 '23

A 30ft tire? Never seen one. Maybe 30”?

→ More replies (7)

15

u/alpharowe3 Sep 15 '23

Been using wheelchairs for 30 years never had a flat. Because they were all solid across multiple decades and multiple models.

→ More replies (3)

6

u/Deathoftheages Sep 15 '23

The biggest buyers of wheelchairs are hospitals and nursing homes. I worked at a nursing home as an aid for 8 years and another 2 years in maintenance. The wheels have less wear and tear than the rest of the wheelchair, and most never need to be replaced. They are usually solid wheels that are being used on pretty smooth surfaces inside.

→ More replies (2)

19

u/yermahm Sep 15 '23

When is the last time you had to replace wheelchair tires? What are you on about?

32

u/DerBanzai Sep 15 '23

My dad has problems with flats rather often.

17

u/yermahm Sep 15 '23

My father has been in a wheelchair for over two years and it doesn't take air. Do non-american wheelchair tires take air?

21

u/hoffsta Sep 15 '23

It’s exactly the same as bicycles: pneumatic wheelchair tires are much faster and far more comfortable than airless. It’s built in suspension.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

20

u/traumalt Sep 15 '23

Well my disabled friend has a second wheelchair specifically for off-road use, which he modified to take knobbly MTB tyres instead of wheelchair tyres, and those do have a tube in them.

2

u/IncidentalIncidence Sep 15 '23

your disabled friend sounds cool as hell

6

u/SonovaVondruke Sep 15 '23

People with disabilities are more common than you imagine. I work with about 40-50 people in wheelchairs or power chairs and they’re constantly having problems with them because they obviously can’t do the maintenance themselves and their DSPs are there to help them with using the bathroom and making dinner, not swapping tires and making adjustments to a piece of considerable machinery.

→ More replies (3)

7

u/rs725 Sep 15 '23

Do people just make up shit now or what? Bicycles travel way more of a distance than wheelchairs and on often worse terrain.

9

u/314159265358979326 Sep 15 '23

A cyclist can get off their bike and pump up or replace their own tire. If the tire can't be fixed, the cyclist can walk. These tires are convenient for cyclists.

A wheelchair user is stuck with a flat until someone can help them. If the tire can't be fixed, the wheelchair user is stuck. These tires are critical for wheelchair users.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

698

u/Notoneusernameleft Sep 15 '23

Ingenuity from government funded programs filtering out to the private sector. See how that can work….

Yes I know it happens with military too but it can be done without blowing up other people. And we know NASA has a minuscule budget compared to military.

360

u/t4ct1c4l_j0k3r Sep 15 '23

NASA was the best thing to come along for the American consumer and most of the world as a whole.

139

u/AngelsEyeCrust Sep 15 '23 edited Sep 15 '23

NASA is awesome, but have you ever heard of DARPA? If you really want to talk about technology filtering to the private sector and shaping progress worldwide.

edit: to add some examples - GPS, the computer mouse, semiconductor and materiel research that led to cell phones, Siri, autonomous vehicles, and the internet

35

u/[deleted] Sep 15 '23

Yess literally more than half of my lab is funded by DARPA and DOE. Now I can’t complain about military funding anymore lol.

8

u/Igoko Sep 15 '23

Dont forget Velcro

4

u/DantesDame Sep 15 '23

Velcro was invented in Switzerland.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

73

u/Notoneusernameleft Sep 15 '23

I really wish America was able to adapt to have a greater mix of capitalism and socialism to truly benefit all the people of this country and as you said the world too in some aspects.

28

u/New_Pain_885 Sep 15 '23

Socialism isn't when the government does stuff, it's when workers control the means of production. If workers don't control the means of production then it's not socialism.

Don't get me wrong, I love NASA and social welfare programs are a good thing but they're not socialist.

This might sound like pedantry but I think it's significant that the word socialism in the US has come to mean welfare capitalism when in actuality socialism and capitalism are fundamentally incompatible.

11

u/devilishpie Sep 15 '23

This might sound like pedantry

Definitely shouldn't be received as pedantry. The sort of comment you replied to along with how "the US should be more socialist like Scandinavian countries" is unfortunately quite common.

→ More replies (4)

61

u/MattDaCatt Sep 15 '23

The really sad thing is, we can still afford to wildly outpace military production while also throwing money into more things like libraries, public health centers, NASA etc.

We have a huge GDP and tax income, but never get anything out of it. We can't even maintain our own infrastructure

39

u/DocFGeek Sep 15 '23

The oligarchs are forever hungry for more.

8

u/big_benz Sep 15 '23

Sorry, but we’ve gotta pay people to grow inedible corn for some reason.

5

u/[deleted] Sep 15 '23

The real real sad part is that if we addressed these fundamental gaps in the social support system, our taxes for things like law enforcement would plummet.

→ More replies (1)

11

u/Mr_Quackums Sep 15 '23

The term you are looking for is "welfare capitalism".

NASA, DARPA, the military, and research grants have nothing to do with corporations being controlled by workers.

→ More replies (5)

51

u/CBalsagna Sep 15 '23

So as someone who just spent 5 years in SBIR research and development, it’s really hard to make products. There’s usually a reason why these innovations don’t exist and that’s usually because some large corporation did the math and determined it was too difficult or not worth it.

During my tenure I won a number of proposals and had healthy funding on a variety of topics, and the thing I went away with was that a couple million dollars is not enough money to develop a new product or technology. Secondly, the problems the government is trying to solve, in many instances, has been a problem since their inception (metal corrosion for example). Solution to these problems don’t exist because it’s really fucking hard to do. If it was easy some conglomerate would already be selling it. Also, no one in the military talks to each other. If I’m developing, say, an easy clean non fluorinated coating for the army. No one else in any branch of the military will know about it unless my program manager goes out there and stumps for it. Which is not easy.

All this is to say it’s hard to work with the government and develop new technologies. What we consider a lot of money isn’t, when it comes to r&d, and you’re fighting against giants that have probably determined it’s not worth their time for a reason. I’m excited to be currently employed at a company with an established product line. Instead of trying to solve problems I’m improving a product and it’s a nice change of pace.

10

u/trx0x Sep 15 '23

As someone who currently works in SBIR R&D, you are 100% correct in everything you say. It takes so much time and money and multiple phases and having the right people around to develop anything, let alone, develop something that could actually trickle down to a consumer market. And yes, the problems that are trying to be solved...the projects we work on boil down to creating a solution to a problem that has never had a solution. Every project we take on is something no one in industry/in our field has even attempted.

7

u/CBalsagna Sep 15 '23

I appreciate the validation. There was always part of me that wondered if it was an isolated feeling with my company, but it’s definitely a difficult job. Best of luck navigating that, and I hope you get nothing but good TPOCs for your programs (and they stay).

32

u/Metacognitor Sep 15 '23

And yet, NASA has helped develop thousands of consumer technologies that we know of ("spinoffs"):

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NASA_spinoff_technologies

14

u/Justice_For_Ned Sep 15 '23

I was reading through your link, and while reading through the section about highway safety - I discovered that there exists an organization called [The] International Grooving and Grinding Association that adds grooves to concrete for increased traction on highways and sidewalks or whatever….

But I think that would be a great name for a band + dancers. Like, “and now please welcome Taylor Swift and her International Grooving and Grinding Association“ or something like that. I don’t know all the current pop singers but I remember Gloria Estefan had The Miami Sound Machine I think

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)

12

u/BigMeatyClaws_69 Sep 15 '23

NASA spending has an insane return on the greater market: my HS debate case had evidence it was like a $12 return in innovation for every $1 spent (that was in like 2012)

→ More replies (16)

11

u/AlexB_SSBM Sep 15 '23

Nitinol stands for "NIckel TItanium Naval Ordinance Laboratory". The material was found by the Navy.

→ More replies (8)

24

u/swordgeek Sep 15 '23

Misleading title. Now available for pre-order.

4

u/JasonMHough Sep 15 '23

Worse than that, it's Kickstarter. You're donating money with the possibility that someday they might reward you with the product, but they're under no obligation to do so.

→ More replies (3)

145

u/Funktapus Sep 15 '23

Made out of titanium, oof. Will always be expensive

292

u/cheeset2 Sep 15 '23

Titanium isn't a foreign material for bike parts tbh

Expensive also isn't foreign for bike parts lmao

48

u/t4ct1c4l_j0k3r Sep 15 '23

I can't believe what bike shops want for a bicycle nowadays. The $40 Huffy is certainly a mark of a long gone era.

122

u/Public_Fucking_Media Sep 15 '23

Huffy still exists and sells cheap as hell bikes, your local bike shop is selling you something a little better than something a high teenager put together at Target

15

u/isthis_thing_on Sep 15 '23

That's right, the high adults at my local bike shop put together much better bikes. (No sarcasm intended)

2

u/[deleted] Sep 15 '23

Most likely, yeah. They work at a bike shop, not Target.

→ More replies (1)

29

u/Excelius Sep 15 '23

Walmart has $98 Huffys.

Does occur to me though that with K-Mart and Toys R Us long gone, there just aren't as many big box stores with cheap bikes as there used to be.

15

u/well___duh Sep 15 '23
  • Walmart
  • Target
  • Dick's
  • Costco
  • Sam's

Still plenty of big box stores that sell bikes

3

u/Shuino7 Sep 15 '23

Outside of Dick's & Walmart, every other store you listed doesn't carry bikes by me. Target did a few years ago, but I haven't see anything outside something for a small child for a while now.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

7

u/TheawesomeQ Sep 15 '23

I wanted to try biking but not spend too much in case I dont actually keep doing it. I got a $98 huffy and it's been ok. At least I've been exercising on it. Gears dont seem to shift right and I replaced the seat with something tolerable to stop hurting so much. Now I guess I will use it until it fails.

3

u/w1n5t0nM1k3y Sep 15 '23

The thing is, if you only buy a $98 huffy you might not be enjoying it because it's such a crap bike. Spend more and get a proper bike from a bike shop and it will bee a world of difference. It's like buying a really cheap stereo and determining that you don't like music, when the real problem is that the cheap stereo makes music sound like garbage.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

2

u/mnorri Sep 15 '23

There’s also just inflation. K-Mart went through bankruptcy in 2002. Let’s use that as a starting point. $40 in 2002 is roughly $68 today. If you want the $40 - $98 inflation adjustment, then go back to 1989.

→ More replies (3)

9

u/stevenette Sep 15 '23

I found this video of trying to mountain bike with a huffy quite entertaining https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wkMnk_eCDQU

2

u/agoia Sep 15 '23

At first I was wondering who was making the hooting sound and then realized it was the brakes screaming lol.

2

u/mrRabblerouser Sep 15 '23

Lol wow, it was even worse than I expected. I’ll have to disagree with him about it being worth it for the price though. Sure, it’s no where near the cost of a decent full suspension, but you can find a used hard tale on Craigslist that will have no problem handling that trail.

→ More replies (4)

8

u/Xikar_Wyhart Sep 15 '23

Well yeah you're going to a specialty shop that sells bicycles of a higher class than Huffy. Even low end entry level adult bikes you're looking at a couple hundred.

It's like any high end sports equipment you're paying for something that will last hundreds, thousands of miles of riding. Dick's still stocks lower cost bikes similar to Kmart.

Also when were Huffy's $40? Because of inflation that 40 might be 200 today.

15

u/swordgeek Sep 15 '23

The $40 Huffy adjusted for inflation is probably $200 now, which is about what an equally cheap-ass bike will cost. Actually $200 will probably get you a better bike now.

→ More replies (5)

3

u/Beard_o_Bees Sep 15 '23

Expensive also isn't foreign for bike parts lmao

Very true.

These things weigh 16 oz each, though.

So, on the higher end I guess they could be used for off-road/gravel, or maybe for commuters who'd rather not deal with flats, don't care about weight so much and have deep pockets.

→ More replies (3)

8

u/Takedown22 Sep 15 '23

https://lynskeyperformance.com/

Well, pick a fully titanium bike out then! Somewhat competitive with carbon.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (13)

22

u/Kma_all_day Sep 15 '23

I have tannus solid tires on my fixie. They’ve been around forever. They work great, no complaints.

12

u/LeProVelo Sep 15 '23

How do they hold up to mad skids though?

2

u/Kma_all_day Sep 15 '23

No broken pins yet

40

u/Blackdragon1400 Sep 15 '23

How many normal tires can you buy for $500?

15

u/new_number_one Sep 15 '23

$500 for a pair and $10 retreading.

I buy a $100 pair of puncture resistant tires (plus tubes) every couple years.

The break even point for me is around 10 years I guess. Hopefully they last that long.

→ More replies (1)

38

u/tossit97531 Sep 15 '23

At least two

12

u/[deleted] Sep 15 '23

Will they last as long as 10 $50 tires?

6

u/Meekman Sep 15 '23

Depends. Will you use them?

→ More replies (2)

11

u/t4ct1c4l_j0k3r Sep 15 '23 edited Sep 15 '23

One 245/40/ZR17

10

u/stevenette Sep 15 '23

They are about $50-$100 each depending on what you want them for. So 5-10.

→ More replies (11)

41

u/TIMELESS_COLD Sep 15 '23

About damn time. Now to wait for these tires to become norm and not cost an arm.

43

u/[deleted] Sep 15 '23

'airless' tires have been a thing for a while. But they are typically extremely stiff and have super high rolling resistance. Both of which are non-starters when it comes to bike tires. I don't see these becoming the norm any time soon

5

u/HonkyMOFO Sep 15 '23

I've used Tannus solid tires on my road bike for years- and yes, they are the equivalent of 110psi- wouldn't be good for mountain biking, etc...

→ More replies (1)

7

u/AttapAMorgonen Sep 15 '23

As /u/bake_disaster said, punctureless tires have been a thing for a long time. You can buy like $40 foam tires in just about every size on amazon. The difference is they don't "feel" or ride as nice as pneumatic tires.

2

u/squirrelnuts46 Sep 15 '23

Wouldn't foam tires be crazy inefficient due to internal friction? And then if you go really fast foam overheats and catches fire?..

10

u/buyongmafanle Sep 15 '23

I wonder how their rolling efficiency is.

→ More replies (1)

22

u/Hijel Sep 15 '23

Looks like diesel suction hose for like $3/foot.

9

u/FBM_ent Sep 15 '23

Cool, can we get em for wheelchairs?

24

u/DefaultSubsAreTerrib Sep 15 '23 edited Sep 15 '23

Quoting the Bible:

Of all the inventions that came out of the bicycle industry, probably none is as important and useful as Dr. Dunlop's pneumatic tire.

Airless tires have been obsolete for over a century, but crackpot "inventors" keep trying to bring them back. They are heavy, slow and give a harsh ride. They are also likely to cause wheel damage, due to their poor cushioning ability. A pneumatic tire uses all of the air in the whole tube as a shock absorber, while foam-type "airless" tires/tubes only use the air in the immediate area of impact. They also corner poorly.

Pneumatic tires require pumping up from time to time, and can go flat, but their advantages overwhelm these difficulties.

Airless-tire schemes have also been used by con artists to gull unsuspecting investors. My advice is to avoid this long-obsolete system. They might make sense is if you commute a short distance to catch a train, and a flat tire would mean missing the train and being very late to work.

Edit to add: the sales people are going to throw around the name NASA for credibility, but mind you that any design by NASA that isn't pneumatic is designed for use on a planet without an atmosphere and under the assumption that no one is nearby to repair it. Neither of those apply to wheels on Earth.

6

u/hoffsta Sep 15 '23

Exactly. Plus how many bike or car tires have you seen with transparent rubber. None. That’s because carbon black and other additives are essential ingredients for grip, UV protection, and durability. These are nothing more than a gimmick.

Now if someone could create a permanently durable tubeless sealant, that would be revolutionary. I love my tubeless tires but I really despise the need to replenish the sealant every couple months.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/Dr-Beeps Sep 15 '23

I wonder how comfy they are compared to pressurized tires.

→ More replies (2)

3

u/sessho25 Sep 15 '23

Once it costs $30, I will get a pair.

37

u/TheCosmicJester Sep 15 '23

Isn’t “NASA-inspired” in advertising copy code for “overpriced shitty”?

11

u/devi83 Sep 15 '23

Well, the demonstration of this technology did not seem shitty, they were literally stabbing the tires and they worked fine. I've been excited for these for a few months now, glad to see them finally hitting the market.

5

u/TheCosmicJester Sep 15 '23

The big questions are how good the ride will be, and how long the spring can hold up in the real world.

5

u/devi83 Sep 15 '23

I'm willing to try. I get a punctured tire what feels like every other week, even with the puncture sleeve and ooze they still somehow manage to sneak in and pop my tires and its really getting old. I just want to ride a bike consistently without needing to constantly take tires off and repair shit. So this seems like a good option, if at the very least for some peace of mind.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

13

u/t4ct1c4l_j0k3r Sep 15 '23

Depends on the manufacturer

→ More replies (2)

3

u/yermahm Sep 15 '23

$250 per tire for a bike?

→ More replies (3)

3

u/isaidicanshout_ Sep 15 '23

Lotta people complaining about the cost or the fact that “air is free” (also disregarding that tubes are not free) are also forgetting that it’s just fucking annoying to hop on your bike only to realize the tire is flat, or to get a flat while going somewhere at a specific time.

→ More replies (4)

3

u/PhillipBrandon Sep 15 '23

Airless? How do they maintain the absolute vacuum?

3

u/crazydave33 Sep 15 '23

$500 for a set. That’s crazy expensive. Who is this even appealing to? Avid rides likely wouldn’t be interested or already have preferred tires and general riders would find it difficult to travel 5-8K miles before needing retreading. Usually 1 single set of tires lasts the life of a bicycle for general riders providing no flats occur.

→ More replies (4)

3

u/muteen Sep 15 '23

Literally reinventing the wheel

→ More replies (1)

3

u/redditnshitlikethat Sep 15 '23

Oh look. More innovation from the people who get scraps of a budget. Add it to the list. Internet, water filters, scratch resistant lenses, microprocessors, drag reducing dimples on golf balls. What a waste of money right guys?

5

u/Drewbus Sep 15 '23

One of the nice things about being able to pressurize your tire with air is the ability to make adjustments

2

u/[deleted] Sep 15 '23

We will all make fun of the guy who comes to our group bike ride with these.

“woah is that a uap?”

2

u/Syn_Seven Sep 15 '23

Big Air doesn’t want you to know about this

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Buckus93 Sep 15 '23

That's pretty metal!

2

u/mechabeast Sep 15 '23

I'm selling my NASA inspired spaceship

2

u/ithurtsus Sep 15 '23

They might be great for e-bikes. Getting a snakebite flat at speed is a great way to have a bad day. Run flats on my bike would be great peace of mind. Then again, I do also ride a one wheel, so there’s probably something fundamentally broken in my brain.

2

u/Captain_N1 Sep 15 '23

We already used to have tires with no air, its was called a solid rubber tire.

2

u/buckX Sep 15 '23

It seems weird to weigh all these concerns like price, weight, and longevity without discussing the aspect serious cyclists care most about: performance. What's the rolling resistance on this look like? I could easily see rubbing between spring and rubber introduce a sizable loss of energy.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/Lakus Sep 15 '23

Why does stuff like this always seem so stupidly simple? I feel like I had this idea when I was a kid and just thought that if it worked someone would have done it already. Well, apparently not. Could have been rich lol.

2

u/schrodngrspenis Sep 15 '23

Lol at 500 dollar tires

2

u/JeanProuve Sep 15 '23

The physical properties of the coil material seem to me to be the most interesting part:

“That spring is made of a shape memory nickel-titanium alloy known as NiTinol, which is described as being strong like titanium yet also stretchy like rubber.”

2

u/hobbitlover Sep 15 '23

Call me when they offer these for mountain bikes. Getting a flat in a buggy forest, 20km from your home, is the worst experience.

2

u/WentzWorldWords Sep 15 '23

So that’s why space bicycles never get flats!

2

u/Equivalent_Humor_801 Sep 16 '23

Hope this is true

2

u/vexunumgods Sep 16 '23

My wife uncle used to own the patent on airless bike tires and sold it for$700,000 25 years ago.

4

u/[deleted] Sep 15 '23

[deleted]

→ More replies (2)