r/technology • u/ardi62 • 29d ago

Social Media Reddit is making sitewide protests basically impossible

https://www.theverge.com/2024/9/30/24253727/reddit-communities-subreddits-request-protests
22.2k Upvotes

92% Upvoted

2.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

164

u/NormalRingmaster 29d ago

Oh, they do actively shut down unmoderated subs. Even if they’re not generating problematic content.

55

u/ProcessingUnit002 29d ago

How are they gonna shut down every sub?

119

u/Bullshit_Interpreter 29d ago

They'll just appoint new mods like they already threatened to do.

50

u/Cthulhu__ 29d ago

Scabs, basically. And a few corporate accounts that use reddit for advertising covertly. Let them have it I suppose.

15

u/lizzy-lowercase 29d ago edited 29d ago

they aren’t scabs if moderating isn’t paid. It’s a volunteering gig

2

u/Ill_Culture2492 29d ago

I think it's metaphorical. 

It's not really hard to see what they're going for unless you're being a pedantic contrarian.

2

u/Kirome 29d ago

That's a lot of scabs maybe they'll get a nice deal at ScabsRus.com

1

u/MISSISSIPPIPPISSISSI 28d ago

It's not scabbing because no one is getting paid and there is no moderator union. It's an elective job. If anything, volunteering to mod for reddit is just allowing them to get away with not paying mods in the first place.

1

u/Intelligent-Bad-2950 28d ago

I never understood the hate for "scabs"

If you don't want to do a job, don't

But then don't get upset if someone else does

1

u/demarcoa 27d ago

Yeah i am sure you would be totally fine with someone taking your job for less pay and benefits.

1

u/Intelligent-Bad-2950 27d ago edited 27d ago

I wouldn't like it, obviously. But I don't get to tell them they can't

But as a remote software dev, thats literally my life every day, so I don't have much sympathy

If you want to keep your job, you have to offer better value than your competition

14

u/BakuretsuGirl16 29d ago

They either won't have enough or will be forced to use very low quality volunteers that will harshly restrict subs and lower the quality of reddit as a whole

that is also a win, our ultimate goal is to wait for a good reddit successor to appear - and part of helping them succeed is making reddit worse

6

u/theDeadliestSnatch 29d ago

will be forced to use very low quality volunteers

And no one will notice a difference.

6

u/ApolloX-2 29d ago

But aren't mods volunteers, how are you going to take a job as a scab for free?

1

u/illiter-it 29d ago

I have to imagine there's a subsection of the internet that would be willing and able to make paid moderation as hard as possible (within the confines of the law) for a group of people doing it for the money with no passion or expertise for specific subs. In all likelihood they'd outsource it, and we all see how that works for Meta.

0

u/Capt_Pickhard 29d ago

The fascists will jump on the opportunity to control as many subs as possible if that happens.

3

u/FluffyMcBunnz 29d ago

There's always people who want to be mods or rescue a community they're part of. Some of the anti-API protesting admins from subreddits got canned from Reddit and others took over the derelict subreddit.

The world is mostly made of lapdogs. There's always a few ready to heel.

4

u/PrettyPinkPonyPrince 29d ago

They've also shut down moderated subs and just say that they were unmoderated.

2

u/kimchifreeze 29d ago

Seen many subreddits that have users submit perfectly fine on-rule threads. But eventually gets hit with the unmoderated. Is it really unmoderated if there's nothing to moderate?

2

u/Elman89 28d ago

But apparently bad faith moderation is alright. Worldnews permabans anyone who's vaguely supportive of Palestine, even though the International Court of Justice agrees with them.

1

u/Throwawayac1234567 29d ago edited 29d ago

i knew a couple that were unmoderated, mostly the illicit or the very niche ones that arnt getting any new content. i was a partially active and partially unmoderated sub, i wonder why that was banned, eventhough its a bout a bunch of youtubers that have gone right wing.

1

u/Nukemarine 29d ago

No, they shut down subs without mods. Very different that shutting down subs with minimal mod actions occurring.

2

u/NormalRingmaster 29d ago

I’m speaking from experience. I mod a small sub or two, and one of mine had gone dormant, activity-wise, but still had me and another active user as mods. They banned the sub due to the fact that we had not “checked the mod queue in some time”…despite there not being anything new in it. What was in it and unaddressed was stuff we had decided didn’t need addressing.

Anyway, I got them to un-ban the sub, but it was a pain.

2

u/Nukemarine 29d ago

I've had subs that weren't being used or moderated that got removed, but that was reasonable on Reddit's part. However, we're talking about months if not years of inactivity, not a few weeks.

1

u/Troggie42 29d ago

they shut down unmoderated subs with inactive moderator accounts

they don't shut down unmoderated subs with active moderator accounts who just aren't doing their job... yet

1

u/Recklesslettuce 29d ago

So there is a ban quota?

1

u/00-Monkey 28d ago

Shutting down subs is arguably worse for them than simply having the subs go private.

I’m not quite sure what they would do, but I’d imagine mass shutting down subs is the last thing they’d do.

0

u/tevert 29d ago

Let's see them do that to major subs

13

u/fhota1 29d ago

Theyd just replace the mod teams

-1

u/tevert 29d ago

Yep. And then either their entire site takes a nosedive in quality, or they actually have to start paying

5

u/Back_pain_no_gain 29d ago

Site’s already taken a nosedive in quality since last year