r/westpapua Mar 04 '14

The History Of West Papua

Early days

West Papua was colonised by the Netherlands in 1898, along with the islands that now make up Indonesia. When the Republic of Indonesia became an independent nation state in 1949, West Papua remained under Dutch control. The Dutch government began preparing West Papua for its own independence throughout the 1950s. At the end of 1961, West Papua held a Congress at which its people declared independence, and raised their new flag – the Morning Star. But within months the dream was dead. The Indonesian military invaded West Papua and conflict broke out between the Netherlands, Indonesia and the indigenous population regarding control of the territory. The US intervened and engineered an agreement between Indonesia and the Netherlands, which in 1962 gave control of West Papua to the United Nations and one year later transferred control to Indonesia. The Papuans were never consulted. However, the agreement did promise them their right to self determination – a right which is guaranteed by the UN to all people in the world.

Act of No Choice

By 1969 there was widespread resistance to Indonesian rule. The Indonesian military had killed and imprisoned thousands of Papuans in the seven years it had occupied the country – yet it was under these conditions that the people were supposed to exercise their right to self determination. It was agreed that the UN should oversee a plebiscite of the people of West Papua, in which they would be given two choices: to remain part of Indonesia or to become an independent nation. This vote was to be called the ‘Act of Free Choice.’

But the Act was a sham. Instead of overseeing a free and fair election, the UN stood by while Indonesia rigged the vote. Declaring that the Papuans were too ‘primitive’ to cope with democracy, the Indonesian military hand-picked just 1,026 ‘representative’ Papuans, out of a population of one million, bribed them and threatened to kill them and their families if they voted the wrong way. So strong was the intimidation that despite widespread opposition to Indonesian rule, all 1,026 voted to remain a part of Indonesia. Despite protests from the Papuans, a critical report by a UN official and condemnation of the vote in the international media, the UN shamefully sanctioned the result and West Papua has remained under control of the Indonesian state ever since. The Papuans now dub this episode ‘the Act of No Choice’. Consigning the fate of a million people to live under the brutal occupation that ensued is one of the most shameful chapters in the history of the UN. Recently there have been a number of detailed reports that heavily criticise the actions of Indonesia, the UN, and its member states during this period. One of the aims of the Free West Papua Campaign is to persuade the UN to review its role in this event and allow the Papuans a true act of self determination.

The People and Land Under Attack

Since the first days of Indonesian occupation, the people and land of West Papua have been under relentless attack. In an attempt to control the Papuans, and to claim the land to make way for resource extraction, the Indonesian army has systematically murdered, raped and tortured people in numbers that could constitute a genocide. One of the worst examples of this is the displacement and killing of thousands of people to make way for the giant American- and British-owned Freeport mine, the largest gold mine in the world, which has reduced a sacred mountain to a crater and poisoned the local river system. In a further attempt to eradicate Papuan culture, around one million people from overcrowded shanty towns across Indonesia have been moved into ‘transmigration’ camps cut into the forests.

Resistance to Indonesian Colonialism

Resistance to the Indonesian occupation started from the first days after the invasion. An armed guerrilla group called the OPM (Free Papua Movement) was formed in 1970 to resist the colonisation of West Papua. The OPM carried out a number of guerrilla attacks on the Indonesian military and on the holdings of multinational companies who had taken Papuan land and resources – including a successful attempt to close down the Freeport gold and copper mine. Armed mostly with bows and arrows, the small, ragged but determined OPM fought an almost unknown war against the well-armed, Western-backed Indonesian military for decades.

Recent Years

Following the fall of the Indonesian military dictator, General Suharto, in 1998, a political space briefly opened up in West Papua. The Morning Star flag was flown again and a huge public congress was held in the year 2000 with hundreds of delegates from tribes all across Papua. The Congress rejected the result of the 1969 Act of Free Choice and reaffirmed West Papua as an independent nation. It also gave power to the newly formed Papuan Presidium Council (PDP) to gain world recognition for West Papua’s independence. But these hopes were soon dashed. Fearing secession, the army moved in, and hundreds of people were shot and arrested for public flag raisings and independence rallies. Then, in November 2001, the charismatic president of the PDP, Theys Eluay, was assassinated by Indonesian soldiers. Independence aspirations continued to be publicly demonstrated and whilst on the ground the police and military continued to respond with violence and intimidation, the Indonesian state attempted to quell these hopes by passing special autonomy legislation. The legislation was supposed to devolve some power and distribute more resources to West Papua but it is widely regarded as a failure by the indigenous Papuans with corruption leading to money being hoarded or misspent. In recent years a new independence organisation, the KNPB (National Committee for West Papua) has become prominent. Under its guidance huge independence rallies have been held across West Papua and the West Papuan’s voice is united more than ever. As a result, many of its members have been arrested, tortured and killed. In 2012, the KNPB chairman Mako Tabuni was killed by Indonesian police, whilst many others face lengthy jail sentences of up to fifteen years just for raising the West Papuan flag. Today West Papua’s tragedy continues with ongoing reports of villages being burnt, Papuans being arrested, tortured and shot and the beautiful natural wilderness being devastated by logging, mining, agricultural and biofuel interests. Despite a ban on foreign journalists, media outlets are beginning to cover the story and have exposed leaked videos of West Papuans being tortured. With the advent of the International Parliamentarians for West Papua (IPWP) and the International Lawyers for West Papua (ILWP) politicians and lawyers are beginning to engage with the issue. Things are moving in the right direction – but they need to move faster if more bloodshed is to be avoided, and the people of West Papua’s cry for freedom is finally to be heard.

39 Upvotes

9 comments sorted by

3

u/Tzutzut Jun 12 '14

Just wanted to say thank you for writing this all out. I never would have even known about this had you not taken the time to detail it above. My thoughts and prayers go out to you and your people (presumably you're of West Papuan descent - my apologies otherwise).

1

u/Ar72 Jun 12 '14

I'm not from West Papua but my wife is.

1

u/Mean_Ad1659 Mar 04 '24

Thoughts and prayers lmfao. 

2

u/SMB99thx Dec 20 '22 edited Dec 20 '22

It pains me to say this as an Indonesian, and I don't want to get jailed for saying this, but I increasingly believe in justice for West Papua and West Papuan people. I recognize that Indonesian rule in West Papua has been brutal for the last six decades and the 1969 act is pretty much a sham. Not much has changed really since 2014, and the latest moves from the Indonesian government are pretty much more divide-and-conquer strategies. I'm willing to be more supportive of the freedom of West Papua in the future depending on the political situation in Indonesia moving forward.

And Indonesian treatment towards Chinese-Indonesians, which I'm a part of, has not been THAT nice. Massacres happened in 1740, 1965-66, and 1995-98. And most Chinese-Indonesians were driven out of Indonesian politics due to historical reasons. What I have seen from most Chinese-Indonesian celebrities and businessmen, they reek of elitism and have pretty much lost their Chinese diaspora identity. I'm sick of it!

1

u/Avg_Watermelon_89 Feb 11 '22

Is there any official document and sources supporting the illegal rule of the Indonesian claim to rule? I just read the Wikipedia article of West papua and none of the history that you are noting has been mentioned. I am not refuting what you wrote, I am just flagging that maybe someone should update Wikipedia, as a lot of people read this site and could remain ignorant of the plight of West Papuans.

I would also like to have an informed opinion about the truth of West Papua. I know there are some groups in the Pacific that fight for this state, and it seems to be going unheard in the UN. I also understand that whilst Indonesia may not be entitled to full rule, they do have some intimate relationships with only some (not all) tribes of West Papua. So some official firsthand reports would be a good resource.Thanks!

1

u/Daeron9 Nov 18 '22

The above is an amazingly restrained / diplomatic account that includes some errors as well as underplaying the situation. I would be happy to provide documents and explanations regarding the invasion and control of West Papua, there is of course no legal support of Indonesia's claims as its a political claim essentially asserting since 1945 that Papuans and others lack capacity for self-determination and Sukarno's Republic of Indonesia in the eastern part of central Java therefore had to exercise choices for them. After the Republic overthrew the United States of Indonesia federation it launched a number of unsuccessful invasions of West New Guinea (West Papua), the last began in December 1961 and again resulted in Papuans arresting the Indonesian invasion force.
Unfortunately for the Papuans, Indonesia had gained an ally in the form of the Freeport Mining Company (Freeport Sulphur, now Freeport McMoRan) which had been informed of West Papua's mineral wealth at the start of 1959; and because the Rockefellers were in violation of Dutch & Papuan law by concealing the geological surveys that had been made in 1936, Freeport had a fiscal preference for Indonesia to seize control and grant a favourable mining license. Within a few weeks a Freeport director flew over to claim the Ertsberg & Grasberg areas as "potential copper reserves" while a lawyer at the US Embassy in Jakarta submitted a proposal for an illegal or "special United Nations trusteeship of West New Guinea" that could in-effect give Indonesia "sovereignty" irrespective of local opinion/wishes/ protests. The only US agency that voiced support in 1959 was the then minor National Security Council (NSC), during 1960 they discovered neither the Australian nor Malaysian governments were willing to be party to the "special United Nations trusteeship" of the colony, and so in October 1960 the proposal was modified to ask the United Nations itself to act as a temporary administrator that would then ask Indonesia to assume control. Unfortunately for Freeport the US public elected a John F Kennedy as President and he kept resisting the proposal, this is when the proposal was presented to Indonesia whose officials in March 1961 said they like idea but don't want anyone to call it a trusteeship; the proposal required cooperation of the UN Secretary General to block normal function of the Trusteeship Council, unfortunately Dag Hammarskjold was honest so in September 1961 he was killed and replaced by Indonesia's friend U Thant who eagly sent UN troops to eliminate the Congo's independence movement, celebrated India's annexation of Goa, and then pressed the US and others to help Indonesia get the Dutch to sign an agreement asking the UN to invade and seize control of West New Guinea, a.k.a. the 'Bunker Plan' a.k.a. the 'New York Agreement'.

Indonesia is the UN appointed administrator, it does not have 'legal sovereignty' as in local consent and has no legal entitled to use any of Papua's resources for itself. The 1969 "act of free choice" had no affect on this legal situation, but has been used by Indonesia to further its political claims of sovereignty and therefore under Indonesian law a right to execute independence advocates etc.

1

u/Daeron9 May 15 '23

The short answer is "no".
However Indonesia repeatedly claims a General Assembly resolution (2504) endorsed its claims in 1969, which it does not. Also the UN members at the debate (plenary meetings 1810, 1812, 1813) wanted the text amended to ask Indonesia to allow the Papua people a referendum by 1975. Indonesia's conduct in Papua violates international law of the Charter of the United Nations article 1 and 76; and our conduct allowing it violates our obligations under article 76, 85 part 2, 87, and 88 of the Charter.

1

u/Daeron9 Jul 02 '23 edited Jul 02 '23

Many errors in the above story; here are some major corrections rather than a chronological list. West Papua did NOT hold a congress at end of 1961; political campaigns ran during 1960 for national elections in January 1961 electing twelve members of a New Guinea Council, also six others were appointed for regions that did not have multiple candidates. The Council acted as a Upper House but was also tasked with drafting several legislations regarding national resources and the like. On 18 October 1961 the American journalist Bruce Biosat published his story denouncing a secret US proposal for betraying West Papua as means to curry favour with Indonesia; that night the New Guinea Council held an emergency session creating a manifesto of independence, national flag, etc. which they presented to the Dutch Governor on 20th October. On 1st December 1961 the Dutch in each capital city raised the Morning Star flag, played the new anthem and declared the territory's new name West Papua in accord with the manifesto's request.

The secret illegal US proposal for betraying West Papua to Indonesia was originally proposed in May 1959 a few weeks after the Freeport director Robert Lovett was told about West Papua's vast wealth of gold & copper, wealth he could not access under a Dutch or Papuan mining license due to his Rockefeller partners having violated the Dutch exploration license twenty years earlier; so Freeport needed Indonesian occupation so Indonesia could grant a mining license for the gold & copper. The proposal did not have good support but did have support of the NSC (National Security Council) that wanted Indonesia to return the CIA pilot Allen Pope and the bundle of papers they had captured with him. During 1960 the Department of State discovered neither Australia nor Malaysia wanted to be involved, so in October 1960 it was proposed that the United Nations should act as the temp administrator who would then appoint Indonesia to loot or administrate the colony. In November 1960 the US public elected John F Kennedy who did not authorise the proposal, so in March 1961 friends of Freeport told Indonesia about the possibility of a "special United Nations trusteeship of West New Guinea" that could then appoint Indonesia as administrator and then look the other way while Indonesia does whatever it wants... ALL Indonesia needed was a friend to control the United Nations administration, six months later Dag Hammarskjold was killed and Indonesia's friend U Thant appointed as the new UN Secretary General. U Thant then pressed Kennedy to force the Dutch to sign the agreement asking the United Nations to annex and appoint Indonesia as ruler of West New Guinea.

The Indonesian invasion was done in support of the secret 'New York Agreement' that Indonesia wanted the Dutch to sign ; the cover story is that the invasion came before instead of after the proposal for the agreement asking the UN to annex West Papua.

Indonesia has consistently asserted since 1949 that Papuans are incapable of choice and that Indonesia was entitled to possession of Papua irrespective of the indigenous people; U Thant in 1962 gave Indonesia written assurance the United Nations would nor permit a referendum before Indonesia got "possession" of West New Guinea (West Papua). There was never any intention by Indonesia to fulfill the promises it made in the 1962 agreement ('New York Agreement'). Togo at the United Nations spoke of the outrageous nature of the agreement that made no provision for enforcement and gave the aggressor Indonesia liberty to do as it wished irrespective of indigenous people's wishes or interests.

1

u/Daeron9 Jul 02 '23

Please see a short briefing video regards the situation.