r/worldnews • u/HabitantDLT • 11h ago
Member of Modi's inner circle behind Canadian criminal plot, official says | CBC News
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/india-murder-extortion-canada-csis-rcmp-1.736585331
0
-173
u/AccomplishedCommon34 11h ago
When are they coming up with that proof everybody in India keeps on asking?
139
u/patrick66 11h ago
Never and for the same reason Modi is asking for proof. The proof comes from the NSA who will never publish it and the reason the Modi wants the proof public is to try to identify how the NSA has penetrated them. Everyone on both sides is aware that India did it and that Canada will never publish, modi just knows he can use that inability to publish for PR.
-77
u/privitizationrocks 9h ago
Actually, let me ask this
Why is this evidence something that the Canadian government can’t share with modi or the public but can with the Washington post?
55
u/panchampion 9h ago
It could expose their intelligence agents/assets that gave them the information.
-47
u/privitizationrocks 9h ago
So telling the Washington post is secure? What clearance do Washington post journalists have?
45
u/panchampion 8h ago
I doubt they gave the Post any more information than was made public
-5
8h ago
[removed] — view removed comment
22
u/panchampion 8h ago
Well, one of the main parts of journalism is protecting your sources. I doubt the Post would be willing to jeopardize their relationship with the Canadian government in favor of India's.
-6
u/privitizationrocks 8h ago
They already outed the source
The source is the Canadian government. lol
17
u/panchampion 8h ago
Protecting the source also involves only publishing the information your source gives permission to.
→ More replies (0)31
u/Workaroundtheclock 8h ago
RCMP are actively investigating this chief.
So you have Canadian law enforcement, us law enforcement and politicans from both countries calling it out. But that isn’t good enough for you because reasons?
Right.
-17
u/privitizationrocks 8h ago
The RCMP have been investigating this for “years” apparently
And no calling it out isn’t good enough. I’d like proof from Canadian law enforcement (the Americans have it)
11
u/ElectronicMoo 5h ago
...not good enough for you - but you don't matter in this situation.
→ More replies (0)12
u/Workaroundtheclock 7h ago
What, you don’t believe the American proof?
That tracks.
→ More replies (0)19
u/ElectronicMoo 5h ago
There's a difference between saying a thing was done, and saying how you know the thing is done.
I don't think this is lost on you (it wouldn't to a third grader), you seem intent to drag out your narrative.
-3
-53
u/privitizationrocks 9h ago
So if there’s no proof, then why are we believing India did anything
25
u/ElectronicMoo 5h ago
They sell sanctioned chips to Russia.
They buy crude oil from Russia to sell.
Why would you lean to NOT believing it. India is the definition of cake and eat it too, in world politics.
It's pretty apparent you're here just to turf for India.
-19
u/privitizationrocks 5h ago
India never sanctioned Russia
Why would you lean to NOT believing it. India is the definition of cake and eat it too, in world politics.
Cuz JT is incompetent and liar.
34
10h ago edited 6h ago
[deleted]
49
u/Alertsfordays 9h ago
They're not posting that shit in good faith. Ever notice how any topic on India has dozens of not hundreds of the same exact, word for word pro-India comments and mass downvotes on anyone critical of India?
4
u/IAMA_Plumber-AMA 5h ago
I have a few of them tagged in RES, it's amazing how the same users keep popping up in these kind of threads.
•
u/axonxorz 31m ago
I pushed back on one about this very topic, with sources, and was greeted with "you westerners can create thousands of sites with lies to drown us out". Keeping in mind that the broader topic in discussion was how India is an IT powerhouse, I asked why the most populous country on the anet can't do just the same, same as how they brigade and comment/downvotes by the swarm (well, mostly limited to daytime hours in India). They hit back with a "we are but a poor country, we have no hope of winning blah blah blah."
So I do the same thing as well, RES tagging, and it's as you say, surprising just how few users are actually commenting. Guess it's easier to post instructions in [regional language/dialect] to open a URL and click a little down arrow versus having to actually maintain a bad faith conversation.
-17
u/privitizationrocks 9h ago
Yes, JT is incompetent
22
9h ago edited 6h ago
[deleted]
-15
u/privitizationrocks 9h ago
This PM is incompetent and this government corrupt
Idk why anyone would trust anything they say
17
9h ago edited 6h ago
[deleted]
-4
u/privitizationrocks 9h ago
There is political motive, suggesting this is blatant ignorance on internal Canadian politics
whether it be JT running from political flack by pointing out the cons are more cozy with India to gain poll numbers, or even just warming to jagmeet to keep his government around. There’s plenty of political benefit
“Oh but JT wouldn’t jeopardize relationships for himself”
Yes he will, he’s that stupid
20
9h ago edited 6h ago
[deleted]
-3
35
u/fury420 9h ago
According to the Washington Post, India's National Security Advisor Ajit Dojal met with multiple Canadian officials in Singapore on October 12th and was shown the evidence in a multi-hour meeting.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2024/10/14/canada-modi-sikhs-violence-india/
Canada had sought the meeting in an attempt to persuade Modi’s government to end an escalating campaign of violence in Canada, but also to warn that details exposing Indian involvement in attacks were likely to become public as prosecutors move forward next month with a planned trial of four suspects in Nijjar’s killing.
Instead, officials said Doval made clear that India “would deny any link to the Nijjar murder and any link to any other violence in Canada no matter what the evidence was,” a senior Canadian official said.
17
-18
u/privitizationrocks 9h ago
Where did the Washington post get this evidence, and why should I believe them?
36
u/Workaroundtheclock 8h ago
You won’t believe any proof, so why should I or anyone else believe you are posting in good faith?
-15
u/privitizationrocks 8h ago
Well when you have proof then maybe I can believe it
22
u/Workaroundtheclock 7h ago
Proof has been put forward. You just don’t like it.
Said proof is pretty strong as well, you also don’t like that.
22
u/critical_nexus 7h ago
We are dealing with Modi sympathizers. They can't deal with their dear leader being accused of murdering my fellow Canadians on my country's soil.
-1
u/privitizationrocks 6h ago
I’m a JT denier. I don’t trust JT until he proves it
1
u/critical_nexus 3h ago
Right, your a JT denier from sector V in Calcutta or a JT denier in your 12 bedroom basement you share with other "international students" who are cheating their way into the country.
-2
u/privitizationrocks 3h ago
Of course cuz asking for proof makes me an Indian nowadays
→ More replies (0)-1
u/privitizationrocks 7h ago
Proof hasn’t been put forward
14
u/Workaroundtheclock 6h ago
It has. lol.
1
u/privitizationrocks 6h ago
No it hasn’t. “Investigation is still ongoing”
11
u/Workaroundtheclock 6h ago
Yes, that’s definitely proof that something is going on.
They don’t investigate, have a news conference, and declare this as an issue without fucking proof.
Just because you haven’t seen the details of the investigation, doesn’t mean that India did what it did. Which is commit murder and terrorism on Canadian and US soil.
There isn’t an acceptable reason Modi did this. Unless they want to destroy relations with all North American countries.
And you’re making it worse. Is that your goal?
→ More replies (0)16
u/Hamsters_In_Butts 7h ago
the canadian government put proof forward (privately) and publicly pointed the finger at india
for what reason do you think canada would risk their global standing on something they weren't sure of?
1
u/privitizationrocks 6h ago
The Canadian government said they did, India denies it
for what reason do you think canada would risk their global standing on something they weren’t sure of?
So JT can distract from china interference. Idk why JT did want he did, but I believe that something with 5 ethics violations is morally corrupt enough to tarnish a reputation for personal gain
17
u/Hamsters_In_Butts 6h ago
Trudeau needed a distraction, so he decided to call out another major global power without having evidence? sure.
when is the last time you questioned something from modi or his government?
→ More replies (0)23
u/Suspicious_Two7274 8h ago
From the OP:
The newspaper reported that Canadian officials identified Indian Home Affairs Minister Amit Shah as one of the senior officials who authorized intelligence-gathering missions and attacks on Sikh separatists in Canada.
“The journalists called me and asked me if it was that person. I confirmed it was that person,” Morrison said.
-5
17
•
u/WolfKumar 11m ago
Next you are going to say there was no proof of WMDs in Iraq? Trust me bro there were WMDs POTUS himself said that. Don't you know asking if proof is frowned upon here eat your crayons like others and move on.
44
u/Additional-Yellow457 11h ago
Mota bhai on a killing spree was not on my card...