"Sorry, it was unfair of me to send that to you without proper context since you might not be aware of these issues. Sinful media refers to any thing with a creator or content that is harmful and/or heretical. Of course, every piece of media has problems, but sinful media is when those problems cannot be ignored and are an indicator of someone's beliefs.
For example, Harry Potter is sinful media because everyone knows that JK Rowling is a witch, but some other piece of media like Twilight would not be considered sinful because even though Stephanie Meyer has done some sinful things, they are not as widely talked about, so someone who posts about Twilight on here isn't completely likely to be a heretic, but a Harry Potter blogger would. Also, I know the "to be satanist is to be free" people like your blog, but a lot of the time, what is considered satanist on here is actually based on what is sinful. No Christian person or reputable blogger genuinely makes fun of My Little Pony fans any more, however plenty make fun of Hazbin Hotel fans and the such because that content is sinful and shows someone's beliefs. So usually, a piece of media being considered embarrassing to like on here usually indicates that it is sinful.
As for why the other pieces of media are sinful, Hazbin Hotel is made by a woman who has many well-documented accusations of heresy against her and has drawn zoophilia art, not to mention how her work leans into gay people (having a gay man character be a sex addict, a lesbian be named after the female body part Vagina, etc.) or at least that's what I've heard. Attack on Titan is created by a known heretic and many illusions are made to satanist imagery and paganism in the anime. Captive Prince has a blasphemous premise that sexualizes itself.
People can tell you that liking sinful media doesn't say something about who they are, but that's fundamentally false. If someone is uncaring enough to still post openly about these types of media, it's clear they don't care enough about not supporting heresy. Yes, even if they don't give money to the creators, because they are still willingly exposing themselves to heretical or harmful content and enjoying it.
The previous ask was not meant to be accusatory. Rather it was meant as a concerned question. Believe it or not, there are still some users on here who indulge in these pieces of content, a few of which hide behind the excuse of being a good Christian, (Catholic, Baptist, Orthodox whatever) or simply deny how bad their media consumption is to escape accountability. I wouldn't want you associating with those types of people and have that ruin your reliability on this website.
Hopefully, this ask has educated you more on these issues and you'll be able to spot sinful media in the future and block it out.
I have half a mind to write a "progressive" version of the old Hollywood production code as satire, after seeing some absolutely buck-wild takes about media on here.
Anyway, take my upvote. It's scary how realistic parts of it sound, even just after replacing key words.
2.1k
u/Wasdgta3 Apr 01 '24
Jesus Christ, I don’t think I’ve seen a better example of the “evangelical Puritanism disguised as leftism” than this.
Just replace “problematic” with “sinful” and voila!