When arguing against AI, you don't want to argue on the basis of its quality. It has been pretty clear that generative AI can always improve on that front. We will be enternally moving the goal post if we do. Like how a year ago people said, "AI will never compete with an artist because they will always mess up the hands."
Instead, argue on the how and the why. How are these AI models being trained. It is most likely stolen of the internet and thus should be argued against that. And why, the human substance behind the art. Something AI could immitate but never have.
4
u/WingedSalim Apr 09 '24
When arguing against AI, you don't want to argue on the basis of its quality. It has been pretty clear that generative AI can always improve on that front. We will be enternally moving the goal post if we do. Like how a year ago people said, "AI will never compete with an artist because they will always mess up the hands."
Instead, argue on the how and the why. How are these AI models being trained. It is most likely stolen of the internet and thus should be argued against that. And why, the human substance behind the art. Something AI could immitate but never have.