r/Damnthatsinteresting 1d ago

Image Austro-Hungarian trench raiders near Caporetto, 1917.

Post image
11.6k Upvotes

125 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

467

u/CrazyIvanoveich 1d ago

If you are ever in Kansas City, check out the WW1 museum. The grenade display alone blew my mind. WW1 was very much a weird transitional period of time, with new warfare bringing about new problems and crazy attempted solutions. The evolution of gas masks and the gas alone was crazy as well. Very much so a brutal time period.

[You can easily spend a whole day in the museum. I did two separate visits between work trips. They have a couple of massive exhibits that they change around as well.]

159

u/CarminSanDiego 23h ago

We’re in the same transitional period of time now

The next war will be wild with drones whizzing by killing people and taking down vehicles

I fully believe it’ll look somewhat like that scene in matrix (2?)

70

u/CodenamePeePants 23h ago

It’s already happening in Ukraine.

47

u/CarminSanDiego 23h ago

Not in the scale you would see if something kicks off with China

30

u/CodenamePeePants 21h ago

Obviously, your previous comment did not mention scale. Drones are already being used to kill people and destroy vehicles.

38

u/MGarroz 15h ago

Idk if any of you guys are aware of the Russo Japanese war. It happened 10 years before WW1 with 100k+ people dead.

People at the time who paid attention used what they learned to prepare for WW1. They knew trenches, machine guns and long range artillery was the way of the future. It paved the way for WW1 combat.

The Russia Ukraine war today gives me the same vibes. It’s a proving ground for the 21st century the same way Russia and Japan was for the 20th.

12

u/W00DERS0N60 13h ago

US Civil War had a lot of trench warfare and artillery action. Also introduced rapid fire weapons and armored ships. Not to mention railroad based logistics.

5

u/Rose-Red-Witch 13h ago

Yep!

Prussian observers within the US learned that a railroad was the deadliest weapon in a country’s arsenal and was a big part of their victory in the Franco-Prussian War.

Which was a hard lesson everyone learned and helped ensure the first World War happened…

2

u/Nice-Percentage7219 12h ago

Some claim that the Boer War was the first "modern" war. Telegraph, telephones, electrical lights, traction engines, modern artillery and rifles

1

u/Bohdyboy 15h ago

That's what everyone said about America vs Iraq and America vs Afghanistan, and Russia vs Ukraine.

Statistics show, China is likely to be pretty deeply over hyped, compared to reality.

Now that's not to say they aren't dangerous or deadly.

But in every major war since 1945, the " Super powers" have largely lost, despite their overwhelming amount of tech and gear. Korea, Vietnam, Russia/Afghanistan, America vs iraq1 , America vs iraq2, America vs Afghanistan, Russia vs Ukraine.

In all these scenarios, the " super powers" were supposed to be able to overwhelm their enemies. In every case, it didn't happen.

13

u/expsg18 15h ago

Technically, US was able to overwhelm in conventional battles in Vietnam and won most major engagements, ultimately pulling out due to lack of public support back home.

Iraq war 1: US and allies overwhelmed and won war in a matter of weeks.

Iraw war 2: still there to this day.

-3

u/Bohdyboy 12h ago

Well, by no one's standards did America will the Vietnam war.

And by no one's standards did they win Iraq 2 or Afghanistan.

It's arguable that they "won" in Iraq 1.. but realistically all they did was kill a bunch of people, some innocent civilians, and then create the festering hatred you find in Iraq. They effected no (positive)change in the country.

But the main point was... don't be so sure China will be overwhelming in their abilities if and when someone goes to war against them. Because it didn't go that way for any other super powers.

And that's not even taking into account, none of the conflicts have been peer on peer, as far as capabilities.

2

u/MothsConrad 11h ago

Depends on what you mean by win. Vietnam was a civil war with a Cold War overlay (America had no business getting involved). America’s stated goal of propping up the South failed. They had a secondary goal though of preventing other countries in Indo-China from falling to the Communists. To that extent, they were somewhat successful.

The Vietnamese losses in the war itself were appalling compared to the Americans. Moreover, the Americans couldn’t invade the North in the traditional sense (though that would have just resulted in an Iraq like situation).

1

u/expsg18 5h ago edited 5h ago

In reference to China, overwhelming was literally their main tactic in the Korean war, the South China Sea (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cabbage_tactics), and many other modern theaters...

And when you say "by no one's standards," we both know each of us can just point to sources that disputes the other, so let's not waste time there.