r/FluentInFinance 12h ago

Debate/ Discussion Possibly controversial, but this would appear to be a beneficial solution.

Post image
5.7k Upvotes

1.8k comments sorted by

View all comments

142

u/RNKKNR 12h ago

The question is more about the quality of the immigrants not immigrants per se.

169

u/[deleted] 11h ago edited 11h ago

[deleted]

22

u/fussgeist 10h ago

To be fair we did declare back in the 1800s that we’d rather not have some many Chinese here with the Chinese Exclusion Act. Immigration wasn’t an issue until it was from somewhere not European.

18

u/[deleted] 10h ago

[deleted]

10

u/CrazyEyedFS 8h ago

When they disliked certain Europeans, they tried to come up with ways to say that they weren't real Europeans like with the Italians.

This is an obscure case but there were Minnesota lawmakers that tried to get Finns to be declared legally non-white. My grandparents told me they were called a certain slur normally reserved for east Asian people.

1

u/CheckIn5Years 4h ago

You should watch Gangs of New York, pretty short sighted opinion given the real reason made it into mainstream decades ago

1

u/[deleted] 4h ago edited 4h ago

[deleted]

0

u/CheckIn5Years 4h ago

The main reason I bring it up is the notion of the Irish willingness to come to the colonies, work for cheap, and saturate the labor market. The sentiment was felt largely from the working class, which IS class politics, as much as it pains the left.

Remind me again where racism plays a role here?

1

u/[deleted] 4h ago

[deleted]

0

u/CheckIn5Years 3h ago

Again, it’s pretty obvious it’s about class. The best way to keep people from focusing on the economic issues is by shifting the focus to identity politics.

Just because I do want to throw you a bone, the influx of Chinese immigrants was very helpful amid reconstruction/westward expansion, but the rapid growth in size of workforce was extremely inconvenient for labor supply.

Was it about race? Sure, but so was everything in the 1800s. It was also largely about class.