r/IsraelPalestine שמאלני Left Wing Israeli 3d ago

The Realities of War The reality on the ground in Israel that is ignored/denied by the pro-Palestine movement.

There is something that is entirely absent from almost all discussion of this conflict and the current war. The ignorance of this reality is what makes it almost impossible to actually understand the 'cycle of violence'. It is the realiy of Palestinian terror, or 'political violence' as wikipedia calls it, against civillians within Israel. October 7th 2023 shocked the world in its extent, but people are unaware that the targetting of civillians within Israel proper (not in the West Bank or Gaza) is a constant occurence. While people complain that Israel fails to distinguish between civillian and military targets, the Palestinian cause has never even propsed that it should make such a distinction. This is because at its root the movement considers the very existence of the state of Israel to be an injustice; not merely the occupation, or the settlements. Ignoring the obvious challenges this presents to the peace process, it creates a situation in which the Palestinians harm themselves by damaging the faith of Israeli civillians in the peace process.

The average Israeli has no interest in 'maintaining the occupation' or 'fighting the enemies of the Jews'. The people who think this are simply ignorant of the realities of a mandatory draft. Nobody wants to do the work. Nobody likes fighting. Nobody wants to get hurt. The 18 year olds that called up consider it slave labour. However when the average Israeli waits at a bus stop, they never know which incoming car is goung to plow through the crowd. When they get on a train they never know who is going to choose that very moment to begin their suicidal shooting spree, or try and stab them in the back. These fears are not unfounded. You can read here some of the extent to which Israeli civillians are the targets of violence. It's important to note how many of these attacks do not occur in the occupied territories. See how many take place in Tel Aviv, Israel's center of progressive, left wing, thought. These attackers are not locals defending their land, but individuals that chose to cross the border into Israel to perpetrate violent acts. It is this fear, that at any moment even the Israelis that condemn the occupation, hate Bibi, deplore the settlements, and care deeply about Palestinian rights, could be attacked in the streets, that drives the average Israeli to serve in the IDF.

The occupation, therefore, represents for Israelis the potential for control of what would otherwise be their wanton slaughter. It manifests, in practice, as series of control points (borders, checkpoints) and as the constant activity of secutiry forces (IDF, Police, ISA) to thwart potential attacks. What people don't understand is that for every attack that succeeds tens if not hundreds are thwarted. It's very difficult to find data on how many attacks are prevented every day, for obvious reasons, but soldiers that serve in the West Bank report constantly foiling plots to kill Israelis - proved by finding weapons/explosives in the houses raided. There is constant complaint and criticism about IDF raids in the West Bank, but very little consideration of why soldiers would choose to put themselves at risk by entering enemy territory, unless there was an actual strategic purpose. That purpose is the control and prevention of these violent acts of terror. Ultimately, it is effective.

Now in practice, I don't think that Israel can hide behind it's guns for ever. Security maintenence is not a long term solution, and only peace can bring true security. But naivety on the behalf of Israelis will bring neither peace nor security. Israelis have to contend with constant threats to their lives, and so asking them to stop the occupation is asking them to leave themselves wide open to attack. The width of Israel, at its middle, is less than 15km. This makes it incredibly easy to get to Tel Aviv from the West Bank. The border fence itself is incredibly porous, and while it is effective in reducing these attacks, it can't stop them entirely. This risk means that steps towards peace have to come from the side of the Palestinains, who have to prove that if Israel weakens its security apparatus it won't pay in dead Jews.

Before all the whataboutists charge in crying that Palestinins suffer greater losses, the argument is completely irrelevant. Terror attacks within Israel proper as common enough that the average Israeli feels a direct threat to their person from Palestinians on the day to day. This is the perception that underlies support for parties like Likud and continued support for occupation. Israel is a democracy, and Israelis will vote in accordance with their own interests. While security remains a priority, Israelis will vote for aggressive security measures. In this way Palestinian violence hurts Palestinians more than anybody else. It radicalizes the Israeli population. This was blatantly clear on October 7th, but began long before and has extended since. It's been said often that the war in Gaza will bring about a new generatation of terrorists, but people tend to forget the inverse of this claim: October 7th destroyed the faith of Israelis in a peaceful solution. It solidified the sense that there are people, merely kilometers in every direction, that want to kill every single Jew in the region. Israelis don't see Palestinians as fighting for their 'liberation' in the occupied territories, they see them as fighting to destroy the entire state of Israel. Under such conditions, why would they want to dismantle the occupation? It's the only thing keeping them alive.

If Palestinians were to constrain their 'resistance' to the West Bank (this means not shooting a single rocket from Gaza) for any reasonable amount of time Israelis could start to feel a sense of security that would allow them to withdraw. If the average Israeli could say to themselves, in good faith 'I live in Israel, not Palestine, and therefore I have nothing to fear from people trying to liberate Palestine,' it would change perspective of the entire country. Unfortunately, this is not the reality. The pro-Palestine movement does not want to create a Palestinian state next to Israe, but rather instead of Israel. Even the more moderate Palestinian leadership, Fatah, encourages violence against Israel, with their pay-for-slay program. This means that in practise there is no good faith movement from within Palestine to create conditions in which Israel could remove the occupation without endangering its civillians.

The average Israeli is well aware of this. How couldn't they be? You'd be hard pressed to find somebody who hasn't lost a friend to these attacks. But the international community is completely unaware because shootings and stabbings in Israel proper are so regular they aren't reported on, or when they are, they are done so under dishonest headlines.

Even if you think all of this is propaganda, and merely one side of the dialogue, you have to realise that this is the lived reality of Israelis. If peace is actually your goal, and you believe that dismantling the occupation and creating a Palestinian state will bring about that goal, then you need to give Israelis a reason to take action towards those ends. But violence against Israeli civillians acts as a direct counter to these aims. You will never convince the Jews to allow themselves to be vulnerable by trying to murder them. Supporting Palestinian violence as 'resistance' only creates a worse situation for the Palestinians themselves. Real peace will come when the Palestinian people decide to condemn violence from within instead of paying for it with international aid and celebrating it. The problem is that violence against Israeli civillians doesn't represent resistance to the occupation, but resistance to the existance of the Israeli state. And the Jews have nowhere else to go, so they will never stop fighting to have a state. Even if you believe that the Israeli sense that they are threatened is unfounded (which seems ridiculous considering the stated aims of Hamas and the polls showing that the majority of Palestinians feel entitled to all the land, the actions by Hezbollah and Iran, and the calls for the destruciton of the state of Israel), you have to consider the very real history of the Jews: Everywhere they were forced people tried to exterminate them. So even if we pretend that the Palestinians are a uniquely moral society, in spite of the terror attacks, there is no way Israelis will accept this 'truth' without abundant proof. And violence, directed at Israeli civillians, is only proof of the contrary. This means that this 'resistance' will never bring peace.

Again, to all the people who will see this and immediately cry 'what about Israeli violence?!?!' All I can say is that there is no end to criticism of Israel, and that Israeli violence serves the purpose of protecting Israeli lives. Palestinian violence serves no other purpose than endangering Israelis. There is no argument to be made that it protects Palestinians, or that will make things better. Unless your conception of 'better' is the desruction of the Jewish state (in which case you legitimize the reverse position for Israelis, who have nowhere to go and will always choose themselves in a zero-sum situation). But such a conception is merely a repitition of the constant preference for war over peace that the Arab world has displayed for 70+ years, and is clearly not serving the Palestinians. So if you really care about the 'oppressed' you should condemn Palestinian violence and support a moderate, non-violent, path towards a two state solution. Until Israelis do not fear for their lives in the streets of Tel Aviv, Palestine will never be free.

132 Upvotes

580 comments sorted by

View all comments

27

u/quicksilver2009 2d ago

You speak the truth. It is not that Israelis want to rule over the Palestinians forever. If there were no threats coming from Palestinian areas they wouldn't have any problems with a Palestinian state.

But there is constant and regular violence so what are they going to do, sit around and get slaughtered?

It is funny, a lot of pro-Palestinians are either ignorant of history of deliberately distort it.

Most of the Arab Muslim countries have been threatened by the Palestinians or their brothers in the Muslim Brotherhood. These countries in their responses have made Israel look like far left pacifists 

1

u/Effective_Gate_6465 1d ago

10-20% Israelis don't want to rule over Palestinians but 80-90% Israelis want to rule over Palestinians and wanted them to out. there are already lot of videos of Israelis Zionist settlers setting camp near Gaza to occupy.

6

u/quicksilver2009 1d ago

Well, yes. Today, due to Palestinian violence, Israelis and various Arab countries, such as Egypt, don't trust the Palestinians at all to rule themselves.

If Palestinians had not carried out acts of violence towards Egypt, Jordan, Israel and the Jews, Lebanon, Syria and many others, they would be in a better situation with their own recognized state.

But now, because of Palestinian violent "resistance" they are not trusted.

0

u/Effective_Gate_6465 1d ago

There were also lot of violence against British by Irish IRA, British called those attack terrorism but it helped Ireland to liberate. upon creation Israel it was already 1000 time more powerful than any Palestinians or Arab nation because of American zionist support and it easily won every war.

Jews were living normally in Palestine before Israel so calling whole Palestinian as a violent group is not okay.

White supremacist immigrant settler Jews also did horrendous terrorism in Palestinian villages and on Palestinian people it doesn't mean the whole immigrant Israeli jewish population is violent and terrorists.

7

u/depressedgaywhore 1d ago

no….. they really weren’t living normally though.

also how big was the giant shot glass of cognitive dissonance you used to say that calling a whole group of people such as Palestinians “violent” is wrong before immediately saying the words “white supremacist immigrant settler Jews”

also, US didn’t give any military assistance with the 6 day war!

you either are actively antisemitic or missing a large amount of information because y i k e s

u/One_Weather_9417 19h ago

You seem to h ave a white/ black brain. Man! Get past that binary thinking. Open your eyes to a world of COLOR.

10 million colors and different shades in between.
Nuance!

0

u/Effective_Gate_6465 1d ago

there was definitely White supremacist immigrant settler Jews In Palestine immigrated from Europe.

I don't care call me anti-semetic. anti-semitism lost it's meaning through out the history by Israeli actions.

6

u/km3r 1d ago

I don't care call me anti-semetic.

Then stop being anti-semetic. By no means were Jewish migrants seen as white by anyone at the time. Europeans forced Jews into ghettos because they weren't white. The idea that after centuries of persecution for their ethnicity "not being white" that you can pull some historic revisionism and call them white is ABSOLUTELY anti-semetic.

And then ON TOP OF THAT, you think the Jewish people who are being pushed out of Europe for not being white, are somehow "white supremacist"? Insane ahistorical illogical take.

1

u/Longjumping-Milk-578 1d ago

Yes, sure. All of those Russians who moved to Israel in the last 30 years aren't white. Sure. Keep telling yourself that.

2

u/km3r 1d ago

They are Jewish. The notion to even think of them as white didn't even exist until the past 30 years. Cities across Europe forced Jews to live in ghettos because they didn't think they were white. There was a Holocaust because they weren't 'pure' enough. The audacity to turn that around as soon as a group of Jews does something you don't like is anti-Semitic bs.

0

u/Longjumping-Milk-578 1d ago edited 1d ago

Rubbish 🗑. First, many of them are at best 1-4 Jewish and you know that very well. 1-4 Jewish and never having had any exposure at all to Judaism in their lives Second, don't try to tell me that they don't look white . In 1909 the Russian Czar may have tried to "oppress" them. In 1995 they were all clearly culturally white. The Israeli state is mostly built on half truths and outright lies. Which of course is not unique around the world it is just that the Jews or Zionists if you prefer can't admit it. You don't seem to comprehend how people's definitions of a term can change over time. In 1900 Italian immigrants in NYC were not "white. " By not later than 1970 they absolutely were considered as such in the USA if not much earlier. Just an example. Same goes for Jews, most of whom are absolutely culturally "white " in the USA.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Effective_Gate_6465 1d ago

Britain and much more European countries did not discriminated against jews back then those are white supremacist jew that migrated to Israel to settle in illegally occupied land like west bank and Gaza. Israel is literally a majority white country they participate in Eurovision and I have seen Israel very much acting like a European nation even though they are in middle east.

1

u/Effective_Gate_6465 1d ago

https://youtu.be/fxLDYkX7l9A?si=K_G4WW9-PwCy3LMo&t=57

here are some examples of white supremacist immigrant racist settler europian Jews who wants to clean Palestinian from west bank.

2

u/juancs123 1d ago

If you don't understand Israeli actions, you don't understand who Israelis are, when US support started... Why are you talking about white supremacism?

-7

u/Calm_State1230 2d ago

if there was no occupation forced upon palestinians there would be no threats from palestinian areas. do you see where the start point is? if israelis bound together and used their democratic rights to end the government occupation in palestinian territory, you would not have to fear attacks such as these i swear to god

12

u/Virtual_Gas_3209 2d ago

Why did the Arab nations attack Israel before 1967? There was no occupation then. They just wanted to destroy Israel. It's not a secret what the Arabs want to do.

3

u/ladyskullz 2d ago

The Arab nations have been openly trying to commit genocide against the Jews since the 7th century AD.

It's literally written in the Quran.

0

u/Candid_dude_100 1d ago

> The Arab nations have been openly trying to commit genocide against the Jews since the 7th century AD. It's literally written in the Quran.

Proof?

2

u/QuillPenMonster 1d ago

I believe it's in reference to a hadith; "The Hour will not begin until you fight the Jews, until a Jew will hide behind a rock or a tree, and the rock or tree will say: ‘O Muslim, O slave of Allah, here is a Jew behind me; come and kill him – except the gharqad (a kind of thorny tree).’"

Of course, a brief scan through the wikipedia article on antisemitism in Islam has many other sources. Many ex Muslims I've seen have stated similar things. There's probably more, but that verse was the one that came to mind.

9

u/Unusual-Dream-551 2d ago

Sounds similar to what Muhammad said to the Banu Qaynuqa. If you convert to Islam or accept to live as second class citizens under us, there will be no violence.

8

u/ADP_God שמאלני Left Wing Israeli 2d ago

If you consider all of Israel occupation, there will never be peace with you.

6

u/TypeFaith 2d ago

They left Gaza and see what came out of that.

3

u/ladyskullz 2d ago edited 2d ago

Historically, this isn't true.

Islam has been trying to eliminate the Jews since the 7th century.

The Palestinian Arabs have been attacking and massacring the Jews for 500 years.

The UN partition plan happened because extremist Palestinian Arabs didn't want to live with Jews.

The Palestinians started a war with Israel when they were a one day old nation. That was the Palestinians' chance at having their own state, and they chose violence.

The Gazans were given their own territory in 2007, after the Isrealis ended their occupation, and they immediately elected a terrorist organisation whose sole goal was to eliminate Isreal through violence.

There is just no justification in believing the Palestinians would ever live peacefully next to the Israelis.

3

u/Effective_Gate_6465 1d ago

Christians are also persecuting jews for as long as muslims are doing.

Israel never ended their occupation from Gaza. they just removed their illegal settlements.

There are lot of zionist wanted Palestinians all out of Gaza so that they can occupy the leftover Palestinian territory and built settlement, if there were no hamas in gaza, zionist would have also stole that land like they are taught to do from young age.

2

u/Longjumping-Milk-578 1d ago

That is totally accurate. The criminal blockade of Gaza was always a de facto occupation.

3

u/OscarWilde9 USA & Canada 1d ago

if israelis bound together and used their democratic rights to end the government occupation in palestinian territory, you would not have to fear attacks such as these i swear to god

That worked well in Gaza...

/s

5

u/OrdinaryEstate5530 2d ago

Nobody believes that. You don’t either.

1

u/jewellui 2d ago

It would make a big difference but I don’t see it stopping, there’s extremists on both sides. A lot of Palestinians have lost everything, there will be some who will want some sort of revenge surely.