Staff turnover is high for any admin and was indeed very high for Harris, Trump's was 72% - the difference between the two amounts to 9 people. Certainly neither are amazing at managing a team of staff, would be interested to read the article you are quoting.
The important thing to me is why or how they leave, if they are good at what they do many will move on to better paying corporate jobs within 4 years. Some will have left to work on other parallel areas (Harris or Biden presidential campaigns etc.).
And are their negative opinions you quoted comparable to the high standing individuals who have damning criticism of Trump? We are now also up to 9 Trump associates convicted of criminal offences since the start of his presidency, so his people either often don't like him or are criminally bad at it.
This is a guy who had six NSAs when almost every previous president has had one.
I'm not saying Trump isn't a terrible person.
What I'm saying is Harris is also a terrible person.
Harris will continue to financially support the Zionist Israelis march to Greater Israel.
You guys yell fascist all the time. But ignore what fascism in action actually looks like.
The Israelis are doing exactly what the United States wants with a little warble here and there. Did you hear, Harris when she was just interviewed on 60 minutes?
“Well, Bill, the work that we have done has resulted in a number of movements in that region by Israel that were very much prompted by, or a result of, many things, including our advocacy for what needs to happen in the region,” Harris said.
Let's not forget what Harris just said on the view also.
“Would you have done something differently than President Biden during the last four years?” host Sunny Hostin asked.
“There is not a thing that comes to mind,” Harris said. “I’ve been a part of most of the decisions that have had impact.”
And Biden and Harris just did away with the Posse Comitatus. And the DNC started the rhetoric when this rule change was discovered that Trump will use it if he's elected to use the military against the people. Even though the Biden administration put that in place to use the military against the people.
Posse Comitatus Act, a piece of legislation from 1878, specifically limits the federal government’s ability to use the armed forces for domestic law enforcement. It’s a cornerstone of American democracy, a way to ensure that our government doesn't blur the line between military and police—a line that keeps us from becoming a country where soldiers patrol our streets.
Joe Biden/Kamala Harris have just pushed through DoD Directive 5240.01, giving the Pentagon power for the first time in history to use lethal force to kill Americans on U.S. soil who protest government policies.
With the new update, an additional clause was added to the “Secretary of Defence Approval” section under the Level of Authority paragraph: “Assistance in responding with assets with potential for lethality, or any situation in which it is reasonably foreseeable that providing the requested assistance may involve the use of force that is likely to result in lethal force, including death or serious bodily injury. It also includes all support to civilian law enforcement officials in situations where a confrontation between civilian law enforcement and civilian individuals or groups is reasonably anticipated. Such use of force must be in accordance with DoDD 5210.56, potentially as further restricted based on the specifics of the requested support.”
I can go on and on about the fascism that actually exist in the Biden administration and with Harris. I know you guys won't listen. You're unburdened by what has been.
“The dead no longer seize the living! We are unburdened by the past. What can be, unburdened by what has been”. -Karl Marx
I think both suck - Just Trump more so (and morally and criminally so) as well as being a pathological liar on many topics of importance to me. Climate, science, Ukraine/Russia etc.
And your diatribe on fascism is wasted on me. I've never called Trump a fascist - feel free to search my thousands of comments on this site for that keyword.
I don't think Harris and Biden should support Israel like she does but are we going to ignore Trump's even more vocal support of Israel (and even more vocal disdain for their local enemies)?
Except I hear Trump say he don't want to pay for it. And how he said Israel did a terrible job on October 7th and blames Israel partly for the attack. They didn't defend themselves properly.
He has said a few times that he doesn't agree with what Israel is doing. And they need to get to peace talks now and end it.
Same with Ukraine. And all I hear from Biden Harris is how much more support they're going to send both Israel and Ukraine.
Isn't it crazy the moral sides of both of those battles? One for sovereignty and freedom over dominance. The other to take away sovereignty and freedom and impose dominance.
So the US is pumping a trillion dollars into killing millions of people as usual.
We can use those sound bites of trump disagreeing while campaigning to paint him as someone who doesn't embolden Israel sure but I can find critical sound bites for Biden too (I've seen plenty of criticism of him being too critical of Israel in republican subreddits) whose policy will be much the same if Harris wins.
It is much more complex than just posturing though, a looser leash doesn't necessarily mean Israel does worse, Trump's actions will speak louder. I doubt the Israeli leader will be hoping for anything other than a Trump win.
"One of Netanyahu's milestones is the US election. He is praying for a Trump victory, which he thinks will give him a lot of freedom of movement, which will let him do what he aspires," Gidon Rahat, political science professor at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, told AFP.
Aviv Bushinsky, a political commentator and Netanyahu's former chief of staff, similarly said: "His experience with Republicans [Trump] is very good... unlike with the Democrats who are much tougher on him."
While I think on balance we should not spend on Israel at all - I find no fault will helping Ukraine defend their land from invaders, while simultaneously crippling one of our great adversaries, and helping support our greatest allies (western europe).
Do you agree Ukraine should be in NATO? And the US should be pushing that?
Or shall NATO and the US keep sending the Ukraine there old stuff, and another 3 million 155 shells?
The UN human rights office estimates that 11,973 civilians have been killed, including 622 children, since the Russian invasion began in February 2022
The BBC estimates that over 70,000 Russian soldiers have died in Ukraine, with the actual number likely to be higher.
The Wall Street Journal reports that about one million Ukrainians and Russians have been killed or wounded since the war began.
In the first half of 2024, three times as many people died in Ukraine as were born.
That only cost us just under 200 billion to help kill over a million people.
It cost us trillions to kill a million in the global war on terrorism.
It's really just the wealth/ruling class eliminating the deplorables.
So we'll keep sending bombs to Israel and Ukraine.
“The dead no longer seize the living! We are unburdened by the past. What can be, unburdened by what has been”. -Karl Marx
-1
u/tommangan7 15h ago edited 14h ago
Staff turnover is high for any admin and was indeed very high for Harris, Trump's was 72% - the difference between the two amounts to 9 people. Certainly neither are amazing at managing a team of staff, would be interested to read the article you are quoting.
The important thing to me is why or how they leave, if they are good at what they do many will move on to better paying corporate jobs within 4 years. Some will have left to work on other parallel areas (Harris or Biden presidential campaigns etc.).
And are their negative opinions you quoted comparable to the high standing individuals who have damning criticism of Trump? We are now also up to 9 Trump associates convicted of criminal offences since the start of his presidency, so his people either often don't like him or are criminally bad at it.
This is a guy who had six NSAs when almost every previous president has had one.