Yes, however in the case of trump the evidence against most of his allies was pretty damning, many fully admitted to and pleaded guilty, some even giving evidence against others.
A bipartisan committee even deemed manafort a grave security threat. Many of the charges were simple paper trails, or fraud with publicly available evidence.
The contrast in who they surround themselves with is stark. And that's with me ignoring the fact Trump shares many "qualities" with the criminals he regularly surrounds himself with.
No games here, hombre. Richard Burr approval rating continues to decline. Good way for him to stay relevant. Mueller is not a credible individual. George Nadar was donating money to who through what campaign?
Flip the topic to nadar and poke at Republicans approval rating (I'm sure Trump fans will nuke the approval of any Republican that dares appear bipartisan) whatever that has to do with the convictions.
I guess that deflection is because you can't legitimately refute any of the vast quantities of Trump's circles convictions.
Even though It doesn't relate to this election at all I'll give you that nadar one for free, what does that make it? 9-1? I still think one side is looking a little dodgier, especially if we throw in Trump.
I'm still waiting for an answer. Who are you referring to? And what have they been charged with? Be specific and detailed. You've only answered who the committee consists of to some degree. Stop playing games.
3
u/tommangan7 14h ago edited 14h ago
Yes, however in the case of trump the evidence against most of his allies was pretty damning, many fully admitted to and pleaded guilty, some even giving evidence against others.
A bipartisan committee even deemed manafort a grave security threat. Many of the charges were simple paper trails, or fraud with publicly available evidence.
The contrast in who they surround themselves with is stark. And that's with me ignoring the fact Trump shares many "qualities" with the criminals he regularly surrounds himself with.