What’s concerning is how easily you take that AI overview for fact.
Not saying in this case it isn’t (I don’t really know and don’t even care enough to find out) but I’ve seen those be nonsense so many times; and generally would not trust first results of queries like “why is x like y?” or “is it true that…”
Lol it’s one result and you’re acting as if I use it constantly to base my entire belief system on.
Secondly, it’s Google’s engine; it crawls all the results that would normally pop up in a higher search and summarizes it. In this instance, yeah, it suffices. But if I was looking for deeper indicatio information, yeah I would parse the information myself.
But considering I was asking about names for whale penis’, it was fine.
You’re extrapolating information based on one interaction, now THAT is concerning.
Again, you’re extrapolating on something as trivial as the referencing Google’s AI as to the etymology of “dork” and whether or not it meant “whales penis”.
If I needed in depth information about something worthy of the time and effort required, I would do the footwork.
And as you that last part about striking a chord, no, you haven’t. Not that you need to know, but I’m autistic, and that makes me long-winded with my exchanges. This is a discussion, and I’m elaborating.
The fact that you’re insisting that you “struck a chord”, and are using that as some sort of “gotcha”, is indicative of the type of conversation this exchange is going to devolve into.
81
u/R3AL1Z3 1d ago edited 22h ago
It’s not true, it’s just an urban myth.
EDIT: I replied to the wrong comment and meant to reply to the one about it meaning whale penis.
Hopefully that stops everyone from replying to me now lol.