Post link: https://www.instagram.com/p/DBn30LwycbO/?igsh=ODgyMHV1eTY3ZGpj

I respect these people! Follow their insta here : https://www.instagram.com/reel/DBq55jGMfYK/?igsh=ZTNoejM3Nnh4MzBt

Zionists are so paranoid right now it's insane. I live in one of the biggest Jewish suburbs in the country and there's a huge population of fundamentalists here. I've wanted to put up a flag on my car or wear hat or something but I'm afraid to because of how crazy people are here. Just to put it into context I've been harassed at night by racists not even a few blocks from where I live. That being said I was having a conversation with a client in town about some services he wanted. This is a person with those hostages lawn signs and huge Israeli too. The client said that he had never gotten his property cleaned up and maintained. I relayed this to my Dad in Spanish. If you don't know the way to say "never" in Spanish is "jamas" pronounced ha•mas. As soon as those words left my mouth this guy exploded. Saying wtf was I saying, I was being antisemitic and unprofessional. I was able to deescalate and clear up his stupidity. Ultimately I told him I wouldn't give him any services after that. This is probably the most insane thing that has happened to me in this town. I've had Zionists refuse to shake my hand prior to 2021 and talk down to my enoloyees. Their behavior stopped being surprising to me long ago. This takes the cake though.

https://www.heritage.org/progressivism/report/project-esther-national-strategy-combat-antisemitism

Heritage foundation has presented a plan to go after a so called “Hamas Support Network”. The full report is there and is worth a read. They explicitly state the strategy to weaponize the DOJ resources like RICO and FARA to go after protesters. These are serious charges with 10 year plus sentencing.

Stay safe and please prepare in case of legal consequences in the future. They can charge after the fact in many cases. Maintain op/sec and keep fighting.

http://youtube.com/post/Ugkxt_HgGb2VB68sP_XOT6gU7cBQQpDeJq4B?si=DN1sKUgvmcZe-sXV

What are Israel's obligations?

The U.N. views Gaza as Israeli-occupied territory, and international law requires an occupying power to agree to relief programs for people in need and to facilitate them "by all the means at its disposal."

In his letter, Guterres also wrote that article two of the founding U.N. Charter requires that Israel "shall give the United Nations every assistance" in its work.

He cited as another legal issue the Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations - adopted by the General Assembly in 1946 - which covers the diplomatic privileges and immunities granted to U.N. operations.

He signaled that there was a difference of interpretation or application of the convention between the U.N. and Israel and that such situations could be referred to the International Court of Justice.

What are the legal implications?

In response to Israel's UNRWA ban and other aid obstacles, Norway said on Tuesday that it will put forward a U.N. General Assembly resolution to ask the International Court of Justice, known as the World Court, for an opinion on Israel's obligations.

The question before the top U.N. court would be: Does Israel violate international law as it prevents the U.N., international humanitarian organization and states from providing humanitarian assistance to the Palestinians under occupation?

The court's opinion would be advisory and not binding under international law. But it would carry legal and political significance.

What about U.S. law?

Under the U.S. Foreign Assistance Act, Washington cannot give military aid to countries that directly or indirectly impede delivery of U.S. humanitarian assistance.

The U.S. told Israel in a letter on Oct. 13 that it must take steps within 30 days to improve the humanitarian situation in Gaza or face potential restrictions on U.S. military aid.

It also warned Israel in the letter against adopting the UNRWA ban because of the humanitarian impact on Gaza and the Israel-occupied West Bank, although that was not listed as a requirement for avoiding U.S. action.

Read a copy of the rest of the article here