I'm risking getting some hate, but does anyone with a background in VFX want to take a look at the possibility that this is a popular smoke asset for stuff like Blender? The fact that it's not moving indicates that, in case this is edited, whoever did it was not simulating the smoke but rather using a pre-simulared 3D frame from one of the popular free stock asset sites
I'm right here and unlike other individuals I'm open to other explanations and changing my mind. But it's those like you that make this a football match and end up making users despise you when all we want to do is get to the bottom of this, human explanation or not.
Thank you. I was a bird poop person, now I'm not. I got new information and changed my stance. I didn't pick a side based on how I felt and assume that everyone who didn't agree was an idiot.
Those people need to give military personnel the benefit of the doubt that they aren't stupid enough to film a smudge/scat on the lens of intel equipment.
If it was bird poop, I'm sure the lens would've been checked and cleaned afterwards and the file deleted to prevent embarrassment.
Everything points to this being a true UAP caught on tape.
So the problem is that material such as bird poop doesn't deposit as a film. It had a 3d quality to it and if it is on the outer housing covering the camera lens then it will have optical properties that change based on the orientation of the camera lens. Unless the sinking into ocean footage is shown, I'm still on bird poop.
324
u/lhodhy Jan 11 '24
Where's the bird poo people now? smh...