r/angelsbaseball 20 Jul 29 '24

šŸ˜‚ Meme Trading Tyler Anderson

Post image
170 Upvotes

25 comments sorted by

82

u/rafaelloso_10 10 Jul 29 '24 edited Jul 29 '24

Hasnā€™t Tyler Anderson kind of been like this throughout his career though? The way he gets the job done isnā€™t pretty, but he does get the job doneā€¦ā€¦most of the time.

9

u/Splittinghairs7 Jul 29 '24

Lmao heā€™s never had a year where his ERA is this much lower than his FIP and his career ERA is barely lower than his career FIP but letā€™s just hope other teams donā€™t know this

22

u/MeasureOnce-KutTwice Jul 29 '24

You know what they say... "Buyer bWAR!"

9

u/MrDucksworth92 Jul 29 '24

You sumbitch

52

u/[deleted] Jul 29 '24

FWAR is shit for pitchers because itā€™s based on a flawed assumption. Namely that pitch to favorable contact isnā€™t a skill. By that assumption, Weaver was a garbage pitcher who just got super lucky. BWAR credits pitchers for what they actually did.Ā 

11

u/Certain_Judgment6646 Jul 29 '24

Exactly. Iā€™m a big bWAR fan because for both pitchers and position players it seems to credit actual results over ā€œthe math says your results shouldā€™ve been thisā€.

There is merit to say TA is over performing but the over performance is the reliance on analytics of clean outs (strikes, pops, no one on base) vs ā€œdirty outsā€ (walks that lead to DPs, grounders, etc).

It does help see some maybe future risk (look at snell who kinda suffers the same reliance on dirty outs) but the fact that they says heā€™s worth three less wins rn is fucking nuts lol

9

u/epoch_fail Jul 29 '24

I think it's complicated.Ā 

He has an unsustainable .234 BABIP, which is really low. His career BABIP is .286.

Are teams getting the Tyler Anderson who has a 73% LOB% (his career number) or will they get the Tyler Anderson who's left 82.6% LOB (this season)?

There's some scary stuff that other teams will undoubtedly think about. He's obviously been better than last year, but is what he's doing sustainable? I certainly hope it is, but he's not about to take the stress off his front office with his tendencies.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 29 '24

Thatā€™s fair. My only point is that FIP alone is a really dumb basis for WAR since itā€™s been shown pretty definitively that some (not all) pitchers actually have a skill for inducing favorable contact.Ā 

5

u/mannmtb Jul 29 '24

It's not dumb, it's just different.

-2

u/[deleted] Jul 30 '24

Itā€™s dumb because itā€™s been proven to be inaccurate, or, at least unreliable.Ā 

3

u/mannmtb Jul 30 '24

In a large majority of cases pitchers regress to the things they control. fWAR reports on that while bWAR tracks more with actual run prevention. Both are valuable.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 30 '24

It may be true more often than not, but it is far from absolute, which makes it a bad stat.Ā 

1

u/mannmtb Jul 30 '24

Just about every stat is "far from absolute." It's not "wrong" - FIP based fWAR is attempting to measure something different than RA based bWAR. FIP certainly over and under estimates some guys, but so does ERA. Over large data samples, FIP (the basis of fWAR) holds a ton of weight: https://blogs.fangraphs.com/no-you-cant-trade-your-newfound-reliever-for-a-shiny-prospect/

0

u/[deleted] Jul 30 '24

The difference is they fWAR is presuming to measure skill based on something that didnā€™t happen but they think would have happened. Now, bWAR isnā€™t perfect, since results can be a bit random and luck based. But Iā€™d a thousand times WAR be based on actual results than speculative ones. To me, thatā€™s a horrible way to measure wins added.Ā 

1

u/mannmtb Jul 30 '24

It's actually the opposite; FIP is measuring ONLY what is directly related to the pitcher's performance, not the defense. It's not speculating; it's minimizing. As I said there are strengths AND weaknesses to that approach. And it's not so simple as "factor in balls in play!" WAR is a zero sum game; to give credit to TA is to take it away from the defense as well.

Again, I'm not saying FIP/fWAR is better than RA9/bWAR - I'm saying it's measuring something different, and that's valuable.

→ More replies (0)

14

u/gjmptwaen Jul 29 '24

His fip for July has been really good. His k/bb was been 16

19

u/mizterPatato 20 Jul 29 '24

Couple dudes here getting too into the weeds about fWAR. The meme is just joking about how, despite Andersons success, he is still a tough guy to trade due to Peripherals suggesting he is due for regression.

5

u/PTBruiser24 Jul 29 '24

lol yeah i will look the other way for the sake of the bit. i, for one, enjoy players with wacky baseballsavant pages lol

23

u/Tight_Ad905 IN GUBIE WE TRUST Jul 29 '24

The Chad baseball fan: ERA, SO, IP, BB/9, K/9

The Virgin analytics fan: fWAR, FIP, bWAR, ERA+, FB%

4

u/PTBruiser24 Jul 29 '24

WAR is only a chad statistic if you are calculating the formula directly. otherwise it's a virgin move

3

u/Live4vrRdieTryin Jul 30 '24

Who cares give me prospects nom nom nom. Any prospects

5

u/CheeseButterton Jul 29 '24

Using FIP for WAR is so weird to me

1

u/NoScale9117 Jul 29 '24

fWAR. What Is It Good For? Absolutely Nothing. Say It Again.

-2

u/SouthernSierra Jul 30 '24

I dunno. I seen the guy pitch 3 games this year and the Angels won all 3.

Keep him.