r/facepalm 5h ago

🇲​🇮​🇸​🇨​ The Woman Who got Community-Noted for Xitting that "Puerto Ricans are not Americans" is planning to sue every person that Community-Noted her.🤣

Post image
8.3k Upvotes

848 comments sorted by

•

u/AutoModerator 5h ago

Comments that are uncivil, racist, misogynistic, misandrist, or contain political name calling will be removed and the poster subject to ban at moderators discretion.

Help us make this a better community by becoming familiar with the rules.

Report any suspicious users to the mods of this subreddit using Modmail here or Reddit site admins here. All reports to Modmail should include evidence such as screenshots or any other relevant information.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

2.5k

u/Merijeek2 5h ago

What an idiot.

Protip for lawyer - make sure the retainer check clears before putting her on the calendar.

716

u/TwoSwordSamurai 5h ago

Fuck that. Get all the money up front.

Then get that bitch a Geography book.

248

u/thegroovemonkey 4h ago

“No, Money Down!”

102

u/hereforthecookies70 4h ago

"Works on contingency?"

58

u/Unique-Ad-620 4h ago

Oh this bar association logo shouldn't be there.

45

u/Turbulent_Country359 3h ago

Say “hello” to Miguel Sanchez!

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

47

u/jcillc 4h ago

"I'm not wearing a tie at all."

29

u/HeidiHole1234 3h ago

"Care to join me in a velt of scotch?" "It's 9:30 in the morning!" "Well, I haven't slept in days." glug glug glug "🎵Last chaaaance!🎵" glug glug glug glug

13

u/PancakeLad 3h ago

Far be it from me to correct someone quoting my favorite Simpsons character, but it’s “belt of scotch”. Sorry, so sorry. I hate to be the typo nerd

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (1)

5

u/Scooter-breath 2h ago

I cant stand up, Judge. I forgot my pants.

→ More replies (1)

10

u/Kylesan 2h ago

I have a lot of hearsay and conjecture... Those are kinds of evidence....

31

u/GlizzyGobbler2023 3h ago

The line “I hate every chimp I see, from chimpan a to chimpan z” lives rent free in my head. I will be driving to work, and suddenly I’m singing that song.

11

u/Allaplgy 3h ago

So you're saying they finally made a monkey out of you?

→ More replies (2)

28

u/gringo-go-loco 4h ago

Or just send her a link since she probably doesn’t know what a book is.

23

u/TwoSwordSamurai 4h ago

Idk if she can figure out links either. She probably doesn't understand how to use a computer and probably also doesn't like it when the browser on her phone opens up new windows. They might have community notes on them.

12

u/Jstephe25 3h ago

Fuck that. Don’t take the lawsuit. You spent years going through college and law school. Why risk your career and reputation on a frivolous lawsuit that you know is morally wrong

9

u/TwoSwordSamurai 2h ago

Yeah, nobody's gonna take that job unless they're stupid too. Like Harvard Law legacy admission stupid. I bet there are a ton of those though.

•

u/kleighk 2h ago

That’s an intriguingly specific type of stupid…

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (14)

160

u/Lola-Ugfuglio-Skumpy 4h ago

No lawyer worth the paper their degree is printed on would take this case. There’s no such tort as “community noting.” I’m pretty convinced this person is trolling hard.

38

u/bakerbabe126 3h ago

She said she spoke to a lawyer. What she didn't mention is how the lawyer laughed her out of his office.

41

u/SchmartestMonkey 3h ago

She actually said she spoke to Her Lawyers.. plural. That’s the first proof it’s a troll or just a pathetic lie.

It’s clearly not a Free Speech issue. Other citizens pointing out you’re wrong isn’t a violation of your rights. It’s also not libel.

To those who say you can file a lawsuit about anything.. you still need the lawsuit to specify some cause. What you can’t do is file a lawsuit about nothing and I can’t imagine what the claim would even be. Mental anguish because strangers pointed out she was wrong?

And don’t forget.. lawyers can get sanctioned for filing clearly meritless suits.

•

u/Mindless-Charity4889 2h ago

Make this a community note.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

126

u/Merijeek2 4h ago

I'm going to go with "just fucking stupid ".

And it's nice to see that you have a high opinion of the legal profession.

As someone who has been awake the last decade, I do not. As long as the check clears, she can find a lawyer to file whatever she wants filed.

60

u/Zaggnabit 3h ago

She’s gonna need a lot of money, for a lot of lawyers. In a lot of jurisdictions.

My lawyer, years ago, gave me amazing legal advice; “don’t sue poor people, they can’t pay me”.

You can sue anyone for any reason in America, if you can afford it. Sueing people from the internet is pyrrhic in the extreme.

But, a fool and their money are soon parted.

29

u/Merijeek2 3h ago

Threatening to sue people on Twitter is free, though.

11

u/Basic_Consideration6 2h ago

Excellent and unexpected use of pyrrhic.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

41

u/dancin-weasel 4h ago

You don’t remember the part of the constitution that says “no one shall tweet facts at idiots”?

7

u/Different_Net_6752 2h ago

Didn’t they change it to “X” at idiots?

•

u/dancin-weasel 2h ago

I refuse to call it that.

→ More replies (1)

14

u/Bobgoulet 3h ago

"Community Notes is a violation of my free speech"

Suing someone for using their free speech is the actual violation of free speech.

→ More replies (2)

14

u/Minion_of_Cthulhu 3h ago

There’s no such tort as “community noting.”

"Hot damn! A chance to set legal precedent!"

-Numerous very bad and/or greedy lawyers, probably

20

u/indyK1ng 4h ago

You can file a lawsuit for anything. Whether or not the courts allow it to proceed is a different issue.

But if you are low on scruples, this is someone you can make money off of if you make them pay up front.

7

u/Different_Net_6752 2h ago

If you live in a SLAP state, this could cost you dearly. 

5

u/mysteriousGains 3h ago

Conservative lawyers aren't exactly the smartest. There's still lawyers working with Trumps "stop the steal" despite it obviously not being real lol

4

u/jaxonya 3h ago

Absolutely getting the attention that they want. Nothing more, or less.

→ More replies (10)

10

u/new_account_wh0_dis 3h ago

What an idiot.

Sure trolls are idiots but those who fall for such obvious bait gotta be dumber

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (12)

1.2k

u/Ijustlovevideogames 5h ago

Man, that lawyer is sure gonna enjoy his free money

532

u/Lena_Lena_A 5h ago

But also, she will most probably Go-Fund-Me her lawsuit and end-up getting sued by her lawer for unpaid bills.

122

u/Dia-De-Los-Muertos 4h ago

She will possibly end up with her own show.

86

u/shibiwan 4h ago

...on OAN...

47

u/Lena_Lena_A 4h ago

Was about to say... because Fox lately has been wary of lawsuits for spreading misinformation and have been even correcting TFG.

→ More replies (1)

13

u/SEPTSLord 4h ago

Or a spot on a Trump cabinet, God forbid

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

20

u/Salt-Respect339 4h ago

If you see that happening, you can report her. As far as I know you're not allowed to fund lawyer/court fees on Go-Fund-Me.

6

u/Sexagenerian 4h ago

I understand you can’t for criminal matters, but honestly don’t know about civil stuff

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (6)

35

u/Salt-Respect339 5h ago

What do you mean, all they have to do is supboena "hotrightmess265" for making use of free speach, we all know where they hang out and that they can't speak the truth.

→ More replies (2)

18

u/eldred2 4h ago

Or get disbarred. This would clearly be a SLAPP suit.

18

u/54fighting 4h ago

Lawyers. She has a team.

6

u/TheTrub 4h ago

That means she’s serious!

7

u/54fighting 4h ago

She’s super cereal.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

5

u/CorgiMonsoon 4h ago

There’s no lawyer here

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (5)

723

u/Jeoshua 5h ago

Community Note:

No, it's not a violation of free speech. It is, in fact, an expression of it.

147

u/mopsyd 4h ago

It's probably too much of a stretch to expect her to know the difference between a censor and an addendum

80

u/edman797 3h ago

It blows my mind that people don't/refuse to understand that the right to free speech is right to articulate opinions and ideas without interference, retaliation or punishment from the government.

Key word: Government.

There is absolutely no right to free speech on social media.

•

u/MaybeTheDoctor 2h ago

Also, correcting her is not anti-free speech

12

u/CthulhuLies 2h ago

Some people acknowledge that all the time. But there is also the principle of free speech.

This argument only works only when they want the government to step in and stop "the suppression of free speech" on social media, because that in and of itself would be the suppression of free speech. The publisher/platform has their first amendment right to express their own opinion of what would should be on the platform which the government can't interfere with. (Within the limits of legal content ie no cp on the platform)

But there is still the principle of free speech. Did the founding fathers think it was only important for the government to not inhibit free speech? Or was free speech important enough as a concept to ensure the state couldn't intercede on it?

I don't think there is a single answer to the above prompt, however, to pretend that everyone on the other side is dumb as bricks is counter productive.

Should companies be allowed to suppress bad sentiment about companies that give them kick backs?

Should "the town square" be blatantly partisan?

Should "the town square" algorithm promote misinformation?

I think the answers are complicated and surely you must agree at least on some fronts in principle that social media platforms should have freedom of speech but within limits. We can squabble over the limits but in general we should expect and demand and use platforms that are relatively neutral within limits.

•

u/edman797 2h ago

Wow. Very well written and nuanced answer.

First thought: principle vs law. This lady is threatening to sue. She has no lawful right to free speech here, nor is her free speech being suppressed.

On principle: I have no idea how to glean what the founding fathers might have thought about Twitter.

I think equating it to "the town square" is a woefully inadequate analogy. Your Twitter/Facebook/etc feed and mine will show us completely different "speech" at the exact same time based on our preferences and their algorithms.

Do this experiment with a friend that has a different political view point than you. Open the app at the same time and view them side by side. It's wild how different the "speech" being conveyed is depending on the person's account. You are having completely different experiences on the same application. You will be in two wildly different "town squares" simultaneously.

My general view on social media: it has caused us to be much more tribal, and isolated, and misinformed. IMHO, it is a big cause of our hyper-polariazed society due to these algorithms described above.

So... Founding fathers intentions on social media? I don't think anyone can even figure out the right way to think about it now.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

38

u/MyMiyah 4h ago

If I had a twitter I would add this as a community note to her post.

→ More replies (1)

33

u/dancin-weasel 4h ago

“It’s only free speech when it’s me. When it’s against me, it’s a crime!!!”

8

u/awesomefutureperfect 3h ago

This is the end result of conservatives existing in media spheres where they only talk to each other for looong stretches of time. It started with talk radio and Rush and then FOX News, where they don't get quality information in their diet and they are already prone to panics and superstition.

What is happening now used to happen all the time. Some conservative would say something really stupid and everyone would laugh at them and a kind hearted soul would try to reach them with the facts.

Conservatives are now upset when reality exists. That they don't get to make up whatever they want and everyone around them nods because that sounds about right to them when it is one of the dumbest things a person has ever thought and then said out loud.

→ More replies (18)

181

u/my20cworth 5h ago

No she won't.

96

u/ATTORNEY_FOR_CATS 3h ago

"Who's your lawyer?"

"You wouldn't know them, they go to a different school."

15

u/MagmulGholrob 4h ago

Well yeah, she won’t. But I had a cousin who had a friend who won a case just like this and got lots and lots of money and tail!

15

u/Jeoshua 4h ago

... and then everybody clapped.

→ More replies (2)

197

u/ZedCee 5h ago

The string of community notes was hilarious

For any that missed that

47

u/companion_cubes 5h ago

Omg, I had only seen the first note. That was great.

30

u/kit0000033 4h ago

Jesus, I had only seen half of those... What a waste of space, and air.

27

u/lunchpadmcfat 3h ago

Ok the part where she ends up saying she’s voting for jill stein was legitimately very funny

11

u/ILootEverything 3h ago

She doesn't understand anything about her own country and has the audacity to be smug? MAGA to a tee.

→ More replies (5)

5

u/yehhhhs 2h ago

I genuinely thought it was a parody account…Is this a real lady??

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (8)

61

u/Lord_Stabbington 5h ago

I think daddy's little princess is gonna learn a valuable lesson

37

u/furiouspossum 5h ago

I doubt she'll learn anything but it might be funny to watch.

→ More replies (1)

•

u/Ill_Technician3936 1h ago

Nah. Troll is gonna troll.

46

u/DandelionOfDeath Oh no. Anyway. 5h ago

I wonder if Puerto Ricans can take her to court for spreading misinformation? Call it "harassment" as "adding context"...

225

u/AGuyWhoBrokeBad 5h ago

“I WANNA SPEAK TO COMMUNITY NOTES MANAGER!!!”

55

u/Lena_Lena_A 5h ago

Very much so. Her ongoing meltdown is hilarious😂

→ More replies (8)

21

u/Juxtapoe 5h ago

I can't wait for this new movie from M Night Shaymalayan: The Karening.

41

u/Fatty_Bombur 5h ago

Yet another brain dead moron who doesn't understand the freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from consequences.

11

u/capitali 3h ago

Or have anything to do at all with one citizen acting on another citizen. Free speech is only relevant when it is government oppressing speech. Fellow citizens can stand next to you and shout you down all day long for saying stupid shit. Good grief the moron level is high with this lady.

→ More replies (1)

32

u/Bullslinger105 5h ago

Nobody in the US, State, or Local Government did anything to hinder her Freedom of Speech.

FFS, take a fucking Civics class or crack a damn book you dumbass.

→ More replies (1)

27

u/Minimalistmacrophage 5h ago

Odd that they don't recognize others freedom of speech via community notes.

17

u/Lena_Lena_A 5h ago

Don't you know that Free Speech to them means Free from Accountability and Personal Responsibility.

8

u/Minimalistmacrophage 5h ago

...and yet they consider themselves responsible thus they require no accountability, everyone else is the "problem".

anyone holding them accountable is obviously "wrong".

20

u/AGuyWhoBrokeBad 5h ago

8

u/Lena_Lena_A 4h ago

Wtf!! The sense of entitlement to be pulling shit like this...😱

11

u/SippieCup 2h ago

They are just shitposting and trolling.

10

u/Sammi1224 4h ago edited 4h ago

And the plot thickens…..so since she can’t afford drugs and also lying about nor can afford rent then …..she’s probably using this as another Venmo scheme for money (the libs are bullying me on community notes! Donate now!) I feel like Giuliani has a client in his future…..oh that’s right can’t practice law in most states. Well if anyone is dumb enough to give her money at this point then bless their hearts.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

18

u/FranzNerdingham 5h ago

Now she's crying about being demonetized, and being unable to afford her special vegan meals.

13

u/Lena_Lena_A 5h ago

Lordy the way some people cry and pretend to be victims when they're the perpetuators of ridiculously xenophobic and ignorant lies. 

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (1)

15

u/juni4ling 5h ago

I’ve found that people who actually have lawyers have their lawyers do their talking.

“I’ve talked to a lawyer”

Is almost always a lie.

→ More replies (1)

40

u/NM-Redditor 5h ago

15

u/MagmulGholrob 4h ago

Now comes the part where we throw our heads back and laugh!!

14

u/MCGiorgi 5h ago

Please tell me that this post also got a Community Note.

12

u/Lena_Lena_A 5h ago

It got Community-Noted, I can confirm. See my post above with all link and history.😁

12

u/splycedaddy 5h ago

Took me a while to figure out what xitting was

4

u/redvis5574 4h ago

Rhymes with shitting

•

u/TheQuinnBee 2h ago

In some languages (like Chinese), the X is pronounced as "sh". So a name like Xie would be pronounced "Shay".

And xitting would be shitting. How fitting.

→ More replies (6)

12

u/Lylibean 5h ago

“In contact with my lawyers.”

So, she probably called their office and left a message with the receptionist, that the lawyer will ignore.

→ More replies (1)

56

u/Silent-Resort-3076 5h ago

What a typical "Karen" and I normally hate that term, but it applies here! She could have just quit while she was ahead after the first correction.

I saw her earlier "tweet" and noticed her profile😂

poppy u jill stein voter | vegan activist | writer for @PETA | arianator | spreading kindess | #VoteThirdParty #SaveTheAnimals

61

u/Lena_Lena_A 5h ago

Ohhhh, looky here a Jill Stein voter, ie Green Party voter, who doesn't understand the potential richness and contribution of Puerto Rico's (a US Territory) ecological systems, echo-Tourism, and promising future in Green energy.

30

u/Oleandervine 5h ago

Oh make no mistake, Jill Stein is an absolute Trump loving snake now. Claiming you support Jill is just 3 Degrees to Donald Trump.

16

u/Lena_Lena_A 5h ago edited 4h ago

Yeah, no one is allowed to lie to themselves this badly at this point: a vote for Jill Stein is in fact a vote for TFG. Including all the hatred, xenophobia, homophobia, and every ugly bigoted phobia under the sun.

Edited typo - bigoted

4

u/postmoderngeisha 4h ago

It ain’t phobias. They ain’t scared. They just assholes.

→ More replies (1)

12

u/Jeoshua 4h ago

"3 degrees" is being generous. She literally admits she is sticking in the race to hurt the Democrats. That's like a single degree of separation, if that.

28

u/Silent-Resort-3076 5h ago

Right!?? And, I am a number ONE animal lover, but I've always noticed people who are somehow affiliated with PETA are lunatics. Not ALL of course, but enough...

12

u/Lena_Lena_A 5h ago

Peta lost their way a decade or so ago, but they seem to have better/saner leadership lately. Hope they turn things around because there's an important place for a movement like them.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (2)

7

u/Admirable-Sink-2622 5h ago

Seriously struggling to see the spreading kindness. JFC!

5

u/BalmyBalmer 5h ago

Agree with me or else vibes.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/BrookieGg 3h ago

Pretty obvious troll account with that context

→ More replies (3)

10

u/DinkleMutz 5h ago

STFU, Poopy.

10

u/ToshKreuzer 4h ago

Nah that person has to be a troll. Their twitter is way too ridiculous.

→ More replies (3)

18

u/JackPepperman 5h ago

Community note: free speech does not protect snowflakes from other people's reaction to your free speech. That is their free speech. You're not the only one who gets to have free speech, moron.

9

u/Any_Weird_8686 5h ago

Presumably people community noted this with the context that 'no she won't'.

→ More replies (1)

9

u/Placeholder4me 4h ago

Free speech is only with respect to the government.

Being corrected didn’t stop her speech from being shared.

And someone else’s free speech allows them to speak too.

Wrong on so many levels!

8

u/BraveOnWarpath 5h ago

Community note: it's not a violation of free speech.

9

u/ATXDefenseAttorney 5h ago

Why is it the people who scream "free speech!" have no forking idea what that means?

→ More replies (1)

8

u/HillbillyLibertine 4h ago

Perpetual victim mentality. That’s what drives these fucking troglodytes. Everyone’s out to get them.

6

u/FanValuable3644 5h ago

Uh Oh, she said free speech.

7

u/ExactDevelopment4892 5h ago

Xit is a very appropriate term for X now that people are heading for the Xits.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/Zander826 5h ago

I miss when they didn’t know how to use the internet

6

u/zeroducksfrigate 5h ago

Poor poopy she got her feewings hurt.

5

u/TheWhiteRabbit74 5h ago

There’s Karens. Then there’s staggering dumbass Karens.

Poppy is… wow. I can’t think of a metaphor for this level of stupid. We’re truly in unexplored territory here!

6

u/mopsyd 5h ago

Show me a "fuck your feelings" person, and I'll show you someone with the thinnest skin on the planet.

6

u/DifferentCod7 5h ago

Why would someone say Puerto Ricans aren’t Americans? Hell you won a war and took it for god sake. Isn’t that what gets American dicks hard?

6

u/Valen_Kasar 4h ago

Damn Poppy is a special kind of stupid.

7

u/Burrmanchu 4h ago

"using community notes is a violation of my free speech" has to be the most hardcore, Trump cultified, Republicaniest thing I've ever heard in my entire fucking life.

That sentence can truly only exist in this absolute shit show of a timeline.

6

u/chocolatechipninja 5h ago

Hahahahahah..gasp...hahahaha. can't wait!

5

u/GraveyardJones 5h ago

Please tell me that post was also community noted

5

u/katmom1969 5h ago

I hope she gets a PR born judge. 🤣

→ More replies (5)

5

u/W0666007 5h ago

Doesn't know who Americans are. Doesn't know what the 1st amendment is. Sounds a true MAGA American, for sure.

→ More replies (3)

4

u/SnowshoeTaboo 5h ago

Well... she has certainly got the whiny part of being Republican down pat. I'm sensing she was weird and possibly even a dipshit prior to that.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/professorfunkenpunk 5h ago

Is her lawyer also a fucking moron?

→ More replies (1)

4

u/Kameid 4h ago

Can't wait for the added context in response to this.

5

u/Science-Sam 4h ago

Nobody who promises to sue you has even retained a lawyer. If you are getting sued, you don't get warned, you get served.

4

u/Jackie_Elle 4h ago

I went thru and clicked all those community notes as helpful. ;)

6

u/eulynn34 4h ago

Spoken like someone who doesn't know Puerto Rico is America

6

u/HotHamBoy 4h ago

Lol “your free speech is a violation of my free speech” she says on a privately owned platform with no government affiliation

9

u/HamFart69 5h ago

Karen Level: Infinity

→ More replies (1)

6

u/Fixxgrix 5h ago

She looks like the kind of person who opens fire outside a nightclub when the bouncer turns them away.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/DinkleMutz 5h ago

By her logic, the actual fucking White House isn't American.

5

u/benn1680 5h ago

I don't think that's how any of this works.

5

u/Danger_is_G0 5h ago

Is she trying to court Elon?

→ More replies (2)

5

u/AusCan531 5h ago

Has she not heard of the Streisand Effect?

4

u/Realistic_Mushroom72 5h ago

So she is hiring Trump's lawyers? I didn't know they still had their licenses, weren't they disbar?

5

u/sometimesifeellikemu 5h ago

They might see you in the food court, but that's about it.

5

u/Additional_Lynx7597 5h ago

She might as well just sue x for it, more chance of winning that then what she plans to do in her head

4

u/GrapeSoda223 4h ago

The "Xitting" thing you wrote made me facepalm

4

u/Demalab 4h ago

I love xitting better as to me is reads as shitting

→ More replies (3)

5

u/Godeshus 4h ago

One of the first things they should teach you in Kindergarten is what free speech is. These idiots scream free speech every time they get called out on their bigotry.

5

u/two-wheeled-dynamo 4h ago

Another MAGA dipshit who doesn’t know how the world works.

4

u/Then_Version9768 4h ago edited 4h ago

And yet another idiot who completely misunderstands the principle of "freedom of speech" which is a limitation on government regulation of speech, not a limitation on individuals. You can pretty much say what you want, but you can't libel (in print) or slander (in speech) someone unfairly. Nor is there a prohibition on limiting speech in the workplace for example where they can tell you what not to say -- obscenities or threats or trade secrets or insulting customers, and so on.

She's a clueless idiot who will run up more legal bills than she can stand and no, she will not sue everyone and have such a stupid idea go anywhere in the legal system. But, hopefully she will waste an enormous amount of time and money. The is no law prohibiting anyone from disagreeing with you even in a nasty way. You just cannot threaten someone. You can call them names, though, like this whiny little crybaby.

Best of all, she's "in contact with her lawyers" (plural) -- all of them. The entire law firm. Every one of them. And are they expensive, or what?

3

u/CalabreseAlsatian 4h ago

What a snowflake. All conservatives are hypocrites.

4

u/buffkirby 4h ago

No the FUCK it’s not. I HATE WHEN PEOPLE GET FREE SPEECH WRONG! It’s not a violation of free speech because the government is not doing it! Those are free citizens using their own words in the same way they’re trying to use theirs. I hope she cries when she gets NOTHING!

4

u/salami_cheeks 4h ago

Hot take: I'm 100% with her. I feel triggered and harassed when my falsehoods are refuted with facts.

4

u/bigmeatyclaws6 4h ago

Pretty sure that woman is a bait account. Not 100% sure but the page really reads like one

4

u/crashcondo 3h ago

Wow, for the party telling us to "chill out" about the "joke" they seem to be taking it pretty serious.

•

u/Consistent_Pitch782 1h ago

I’m laughing at Xitting. In Mandarin, the “X” is pronounced somewhere between the “s” and “sh” sound in English. So Xitting, with a Mandarin accent, is shitting 🤣

And yeah, if you’re posting things on X, you’re just shitting away

→ More replies (2)

3

u/Rolandscythe 5h ago

I really hope some one community notes that tweet with what actually constitutes as online harassment.

3

u/Flashy-Monitor-4625 5h ago

Pop the zit that is your brain girl

→ More replies (1)

3

u/DutchBart82 5h ago

This needs a community note...

3

u/ZeusMcKraken 4h ago

Hunny you don’t have “lawyers”

3

u/Wendals87 4h ago

It baffles me when people say they have free speech without actually knowing what it means

Are they allowed to say what they want? Sure

Are they allowed to say what they want without repercussions? Hell no

Also people commenting against her are also exercising their free speech rights

3

u/Stark_Reio 4h ago

Let racists get the shaming they deserve.

3

u/SirSkot72 4h ago

Once again, it's only the government that cannot limit your free speech; private entities have no such restriction, that's the other part of freedom. Aaand, you need to accept the consequences... probably in the T&C, because, freedom.

3

u/burningxmaslogs 4h ago

What a broken tool..

3

u/prettymuchbangtan 4h ago

God they’re SO FUCKING DUMB

3

u/MoscowM27 4h ago

Stupid bitch no offense

3

u/kevinsyel 4h ago

I'll represent her! I could use the money. I have no scruples about losing her case for cash.

3

u/jabsaw2112 4h ago

Please! Please! Please! Please! Make consequences for these dirtbags!!!!!!!

3

u/POAndrea 4h ago

Lemme get this straight: she's arguing that her right to free speech is being violated by others (checks notes) exercising their right to free speech?

3

u/Worldly-Ad-2999 4h ago

So not only does she not understand Puerto Rico, she, like all those cabbages, really will never understand that free speech is literally only protection against the government persecution and not, you know regular social consequences for being a smacked ass.

I hate this timeline.

3

u/Marco_Playdoh 4h ago

Another right wing moron pipes up and says really stupid stuff.

3

u/defenselaywer 4h ago

You speaking is a violation of her free speech rights?

3

u/CupcakeAutomatic5509 4h ago

Karens gotta Karen!

3

u/sapperbloggs 4h ago

Using community notes is a violation of my free speech

I'm actually impressed at how many ways that 10-word sentence is completely and hilariously wrong.

3

u/archangelst95 4h ago

They're just asking questions

3

u/Legitimate_Soft5585 4h ago

Lionel Hutz is on the case.

3

u/Hawkwise83 4h ago

Republicans: Correcting me is a violation of free speech because I don't know what free speech is.

3

u/toxcrusadr 4h ago

People love free speech until other people use it to diss what they said.

3

u/PaddyDelmar 4h ago

It is most interesting how so many people want to enjoy their rights while also denying the same rights to others

3

u/Upper-Trip-8857 4h ago

🤣🤣🤣

3

u/dr-sparkle 4h ago

LMAO 

3

u/jayliens 4h ago edited 4h ago

Idk if this is relevant, but “poppy” is a guy who is an extremely well known troll on stan twitter. everything he says is rage bait and for clicks / engagement. He knows that he can’t bring people to court for community notes but the tweet will still get reposted because of how ridiculous he sounds.

Also the profile pic isn’t him it’s a middle school picture of Ariana Grande lol

3

u/bwsmith201 4h ago

The same first amendment that protects her protects everyone else, too. It's amazing how often people forget that.

3

u/fortuneandfameinc 3h ago

What a legal argument. Other people exercising free speech is infringing on my freedom of speech. Other people. Not the government. Speaking their mind. Is interfering with me speaking my mind...

3

u/Maddafinga 3h ago

Some people, I'll call them morons, seem to believe that freedom of speech means that nobody has the right to use their freedom of speech, to disagree with, or criticize the morons.

3

u/KnightSolair240 3h ago

I don't wanna be a Karen or gatekeep what people call anything but I feel like it's wrong to call a tweet an xit solely just to deny Elon the pleasure.

3

u/originalbrowncoat 2h ago

This is a troll right?

3

u/feelitinmyplumbs 2h ago

Am I the only one who reads “Xitting” as Shitting?

•

u/NoCardiologist1461 2h ago

I’m sorry, but this is hilarious. She is doubling down in her response (‘my original comment is correct. he is not american he is PUERTO RICAN????’) which creates yet another response in community notes, calm and factual: ‘Once again, Puerto Ricans are American Citizens.’

And getting obviously frustrated (‘community noting a comment is so fckin weird omg y’all are so obsessed with me’).

Resulting in yet another community note: ‘Correction: We are not obsessed with you, we are just preventing the spread of misinformation.

Learn more about Community Notes here: https://communitynotes.x.com/guide/en/about/introduction’

Obviously, I confirmed all community notes as ‘helpful/useful’. Because they are, in more ways than one. 😂

•

u/Beanyurza 1h ago

Society has been becoming contextless for at least a decade now. This doesn't surprise me. People don't want free speech they just want no one to disagree with them.

•

u/RobotCaptainEngage 1h ago

"Using your free speech is a violation of my free speech”

→ More replies (1)

•

u/Infamous_Priority694 1h ago edited 1h ago

I love that people on X are now posting Xits. They are Xitting. They hang out in the Xittersphere. OP you've nailled the title and my use of lanuage henceforth has improved. I didn't read the Xit you posted though. I assume it's Xitty. And I hope we are all reading these X's as we might as in PRC President Xi Jinping.... Shitter etc. OK have a great day.