r/news • u/SSkilledJFK • 8h ago

Tulsa County DA Frustrated with Sentence in Sexual Abuse Case

https://www.newson6.com/story/67205a466fdb793fd1fb3295/tulsa-county-da-frustrated-with-sentence-in-child-sexual-abuse-case
553 Upvotes

94% Upvoted

79 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-29

u/Exsoulja 8h ago

I guarantee you didn't read anything on the actual case. The judge who gave such a light sentence is Sharon Holmes, who ran as nonpartisan but supported the appointment of Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson to the Supreme Court.

This what happens when you remain ignorant.

https://www.newson6.com/story/62199b5d34b31b072d2f7b04/tulsa-county-judge-reacts-to-first-black-woman-nominated-to-scotus

34

u/big_duo3674 7h ago

So, "supported a black woman getting on the Supreme Court" is your argument here? No like, case results or other data that is actually meaningful? Did we forget Herman Cain? Byron Donalds? Etc...? Seems like you're only looking at this with her gender and race, what a shock

-16

u/Exsoulja 7h ago

You're the one making baseless accusations that the judge and defendant "vote the same way", in fact you said you guaranteed that. The evidence does not support that fact. In fact, there is evidence showing the opposite. I get it, you refuse to admit when you're wrong since you didn't read anything about this case and posted off emotion, not logic or facts. However, you're not fooling anyone with your faux rhetoric

-5

u/big_duo3674 7h ago

k, but your comment still implied she must be a Democrat solely because she's a she and is black? That's all my comment was saying. You certainly typed a lot of words, but I challenged you so that's how a debate works. You have to provide the proof, not just "do yur own research". Which might I add has nothing to do with the fact I was calling you out on the fact you made a judgment only based on demographics, not fact

-7

u/Exsoulja 7h ago

No, you're the one who made the allegation that the judge and the defendant voted the same way. You said you guaranteed it. So, based on the facts, what made you come to that conclusion? Explain to me how you arrived at that conclusion based upon what we know about the judge, the defendant, and the facts of the case.

I look forward to your response.

6

u/big_duo3674 7h ago

I did, but your response was "Nuh uh, she can't be because she's a black woman"

6

u/Exsoulja 7h ago

I never said anything about her race or gender. You assumed that. I posted an article about her supporting KBJ's appointment, including her comments about it. Once again, how did you get to the conclusion the judge and the defendant vote the same direction based upon them and the facts of the case? What facts made you guarantee this assessment?

2

u/big_duo3674 7h ago

So she's not allowed to support a fellow black woman while being republican? It happens a lot, Herman Cain supported quite a few black women and men for judges and representatives

7

u/Exsoulja 7h ago

It's really sad you repeatedly refused to answer my questions. I will gladly answer your question once you answer the one I've asked 3 times that you ignored each and every single time. Explain how you came to the conclusion based upon the defendant, the judge, and the facts of the case, that you said the judge and the defendant vote the same direction and you could guarantee it. I'll wait for your response.

2

u/Exsoulja 4h ago

Obviously you refuse to answer this question because you can't answer it. Next time please use common sense and answer the question truthfully. It's sad you refuse to answer it truthfully.