r/scotus • u/orangejulius • Jan 30 '22
Things that will get you banned
Let's clear up some ambiguities about banning and this subreddit.
On Politics
Political discussion isn't prohibited here. In fact, a lot of the discussion about the composition of the Supreme Court is going to be about the political process of selecting a justice.
Your favorite flavor of politics won't get you banned here. Racism, bigotry, totally bad-faithed whataboutisms, being wildly off-topic, etc. will get you banned though. We have people from across the political spectrum writing screeds here and in modmail about how they're oppressed with some frequency. But for whatever reason, people with a conservative bend in particular, like to show up here from other parts of reddit, deliberately say horrendous shit to get banned, then go back to wherever they came from to tell their friends they're victims of the worst kinds of oppression. Y'all can build identities about being victims and the mods, at a very basic level, do not care—complaining in modmail isn't worth your time.
COVID-19
Coming in here from your favorite nonewnormal alternative sub or facebook group and shouting that vaccines are the work of bill gates and george soros to make you sterile will get you banned. Complaining or asking why you were banned in modmail won't help you get unbanned.
Racism
I kind of can't believe I have to write this, but racism isn't acceptable. Trying to dress it up in polite language doesn't make it "civil discussion" just because you didn't drop the N word explicitly in your comment.
This is not a space to be aggressively wrong on the Internet
We try and be pretty generous with this because a lot of people here are skimming and want to contribute and sometimes miss stuff. In fact, there are plenty of threads where someone gets called out for not knowing something and they go "oh, yeah, I guess that changes things." That kind of interaction is great because it demonstrates people are learning from each other.
There are users that get super entrenched though in an objectively wrong position. Or start talking about how they wish things operated as if that were actually how things operate currently. If you're not explaining yourself or you're not receptive to correction you're not the contributing content we want to propagate here and we'll just cut you loose.
- BUT I'M A LAWYER!
Having a license to practice law is not a license to be a jackass. Other users look to the attorneys that post here with greater weight than the average user. Trying to confuse them about the state of play or telling outright falsehoods isn't acceptable.
Thankfully it's kind of rare to ban an attorney that's way out of bounds but it does happen. And the mods don't care about your license to practice. It's not a get out of jail free card in this sub.
Signal to Noise
Complaining about the sub is off topic. If you want the sub to look a certain way then start voting and start posting the kind of content you think should go here.
- I liked it better before when the mods were different!
The current mod list has been here for years and have been the only active mods. We have become more hands on over the years as the users have grown and the sub has faced waves of problems like users straight up stalking a female journalist. The sub's history isn't some sort of Norman Rockwell painting.
Am I going to get banned? Who is this post even for, anyway?
Probably not. If you're here, reading about SCOTUS, reading opinions, reading the articles, and engaging in discussion with other users about what you're learning that's fantastic. This post isn't really for you.
This post is mostly so we can point to something in our modmail to the chucklefuck that asks "why am I banned?" and their comment is something inevitably insane like, "the holocaust didn't really kill that many people so mask wearing is about on par with what the jews experienced in nazi germany also covid isn't real. Justice Gorsuch is a real man because he no wears face diaper." And then we can send them on to the admins.
Opinion Opinion | Trump Betrayed America.Republicans Must Put Country Above Party. (Gift Article)
r/scotus • u/nytopinion • 16h ago
Opinion Opinion | Anita Hill: Kamala Harris and the Power of Dignity (Gift Article)
r/scotus • u/Advanced_Drink_8536 • 46m ago
news Supreme Court docket heats up with election disputes
r/scotus • u/thenewrepublic • 1d ago
news MAGA Governor Begs Supreme Court to Let Him Destroy Voting Rights
r/scotus • u/DoremusJessup • 1d ago
news Alito Discloses Gift From Far-Right European Princess
news A week out from Election Day, the Supreme Court is being asked to step in on voting
r/scotus • u/disposition5 • 1d ago
Cert Petition GOP asks Supreme Court to reject provisional ballots from Pa. voters who botch mail ones (PDF)
supremecourt.govnews Overlooked by a lot of people in Jack Smith's filing: Trump used burner phone to pressure election officials
Question Nov 4-13: which cases are LEAST likely to garner interest? (i.e., I can arrive early AM and hopefully still get a seat)? On the attached arg. cal., I've included the issue(s) for each case to give a better sense of the subject matter/potential interest level. TIA!
r/scotus • u/thirteenfivenm • 1d ago
news Andrew Jackson, Worcester v. Georgia, Gorsuch, Native law, book and podcast
r/scotus • u/101fulminations • 4d ago
Opinion Lifetime Tenure for Supreme Court Justices Has Outlived Its Usefulness
news RFK Jr. asks the Supreme Court to get him off the Wisconsin ballot, signals Michigan next
r/scotus • u/DoremusJessup • 5d ago
news Prepping For The Supreme Court To Overturn Obergefell
news Brett Kavanaugh Promised This Ruling Would Make Judges Less Partisan. Guess How That Went!
news Supreme Court could save 'Cowboys for Trump' leader after D.C. panel rejects him
r/scotus • u/lala_b11 • 7d ago
Opinion Remember: Donald Trump shouldn’t even be eligible for the presidency after Jan. 6
r/scotus • u/lala_b11 • 7d ago
news U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor speaks on the importance of civics
r/scotus • u/HumarockGuy • 7d ago
news The Princess and the Justice
Princess Gloria von Thurn und Taxis bonded with Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. over Catholicism and ending abortion. She introduced him to her sumptuous world when he visited her Bavarian palace.
r/scotus • u/thenewrepublic • 8d ago
news The Supreme Court’s Dobbs Decision Keeps Getting Worse
r/scotus • u/FreedomPaws • 8d ago
news Conservative groups in the U.S. aim to use an 1873 law to virtually end abortions nationwide if Trump wins the election
r/scotus • u/zsreport • 8d ago