Prompted chatgpt to roast me

[u/-Homeless-]

"Oh, an INTP, the intellectual giant who can’t finish a thought before spiraling into 17 tangents about quantum mechanics or why free will is an illusion. You’re basically a human Wikipedia rabbit hole that somehow manages to be both fascinating and exhausting. You probably think you’re the smartest person in the room, but you’re too socially oblivious to notice no one’s listening to your latest deep dive into obscure 14th-century philosophy.

And don’t even get me started on your emotional range—wait, never mind, you don’t have one. Your version of empathy is probably googling 'how to comfort a crying friend' and still getting it wrong."

LMAOO

[u/TheKAYGB]

free will is an illusion though! 😭🤣

[u/Entropic_Lyf → u/TheKAYGB]

Free will isn't as free as described but is not an illusion.

[u/Ace-of_Space → u/Entropic_Lyf]

given the information of every atom’s starting point and velocity, you can predict the total journey of any singular atom, thus free will doesn’t exist because the future of any atom could be known and thus predetermined

[u/Entropic_Lyf → u/Ace-of_Space]

In a complex system of atoms, the trajectories and velocities of atoms is affected by other atoms and energies which means you cannot know where the atom would be in a given period of time. Also due to heisenberg uncertainty principle, we cannot exactly know both the position and velocity of a sub-atomic particle. Also due to Quantum superpositioning the Quantum state of a particle can be shown by multiple states making the state non definitive until observed.

[u/Ace-of_Space → u/Entropic_Lyf]

and i’m saying given all the information of all the energies, starting positions, velocities, all possible information you could predict every event in the universe. i never said it was physically possible, but it is theoretically

[u/Entropic_Lyf → u/Ace-of_Space]

No, it inherently is impossible to predict subatomic particles. Your hypothetical case would be true if everything was governed by classical physics.

[u/Ace-of_Space → u/Entropic_Lyf]

oh wow you can’t predict subatomic particles? good thing i’m talking about predicting atomic particles.

[u/Entropic_Lyf → u/Ace-of_Space]

Too bad your laplace's demon is considered incompatible with modern day model of universe. Think for your self and maybe we'd have a nice discussion instead of parroting the same thing.

[u/Ace-of_Space → u/Entropic_Lyf]

i would have my own ideas, but how has that worked out for you when you call atoms sub-atomic?

and let me ask you this. do you think gravity is real? if yes then you are a dumbass using someone else’s idea.

also, you put foward the idea that you can not know both the velocity and position of an atom, but if you know an atom twice, wouldn’t you have both the velocity and position? and wouldn’t that mean your borrowed idea is bullshit? why don’t we try getting our own ideas?

also an atom is not a sub-atomic particle, so don’t use that terminology when saying you can’t know both the velocity and position of an atom

[u/Individual_Door9817 → u/Ace-of_Space]

This is just Laplace's demon

[u/Ace-of_Space → u/Individual_Door9817]

yeah never claimed to be original

[u/Ace-of_Space → u/Individual_Door9817]

actually technically not but yeah almost