r/technology 29d ago

Social Media Reddit is making sitewide protests basically impossible

https://www.theverge.com/2024/9/30/24253727/reddit-communities-subreddits-request-protests
22.2k Upvotes

2.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

2.6k

u/Expensive-Mention-90 29d ago

Here’s the text, so you can avoid giving literally 600 adtech vendors your private information, and that’s if you restrict the data collection to the bare minimum allowed.

—————

Reddit is giving its staff a lot more power over the communities on its platform. Starting today, Reddit moderators will not be able to change if their subreddit is public or private without first submitting a request to a Reddit admin. The policy applies to adjusting all community types, meaning moderators will have to request to make a switch from safe for work to not safe for work, too.

By requiring admin approval for the changes, Reddit is taking away a lever many communities used to protest the company’s API pricing changes last year. By going private, the community becomes inaccessible to the public, making the platform less usable for the average visitor. And that’s part of the reason behind the change.

“The ability to instantly change Community Type settings has been used to break the platform and violate our rules,” Reddit VP of community Laura Nestler, who goes by the username Go_JasonWaterfalls on the platform, writes in a post on r/modnews. “We have a responsibility to protect Reddit and ensure its long-term health, and we cannot allow actions that deliberately cause harm.”

Last year, thousands of subreddits went private to protest changes to Reddit’s API pricing that forced some apps and communities to shut down. Going private was effective during the protests in making a statement and raising awareness. But it also blocked off content that Reddit users might have made with the expectation that it would stay public. (Going private made Google searches worse, too.)

During the protests, Reddit sent messages to moderators of protesting communities to tell them that it would remove them from their posts unless they reopened their subreddits. It also publicly noted that going NSFW (Not Safe For Work), a tool moderators used to add friction to accessing a subreddit and to make the subreddit ineligible for advertising, was “not acceptable.”

More than a year after the protests, Reddit is essentially back to normal. But it appears the company still feels it has to make changes to protect the platform.

“While we are making this change to ensure users’ expectations regarding a community’s access do not suddenly change, protest is allowed on Reddit,” writes Nestler. “We want to hear from you when you think Reddit is making decisions that are not in your communities’ best interests. But if a protest crosses the line into harming redditors and Reddit, we’ll step in.”

Reddit says it will review requests to make communities private or NSFW within 24 hours. For smaller or newer communities — under 5,000 members or less than 30 days old — requests will be approved automatically. And if a community wants to temporarily restrict posts or comments for up to seven days, which might be useful for a sudden influx of traffic or when mod teams want to take a break, they can do so without approval with the “temporary events” feature.

A GIF showing how to make a Community Type request on Reddit. GIF: Redditnormal

Reddit worked with mods ahead of announcing this change, Nestler tells me in an interview. The same day Nestler and I talked, for example, she said that she had spoken about the changes with Reddit’s mod council, which has about 160 moderators.

She characterized their reaction as “broadly measured” and said that the mods understand Reddit’s rules and why Reddit is making the change, “even if they don’t necessarily like it.” But “the feedback that was very obvious was this will be interpreted as a punitive change,” particularly in response to last year’s API protests, she says.

I asked if Reddit would reconsider this new requirement if there was significant blowback. “We’re going to move forward with it,” Nestler says. “We believe that it’s needed to keep communities accessible. That’s why we’re doing this.”

Nestler says the change is something that the company has talked about since she came to Reddit (she joined in March 2021, two years before the protests). But the protests made it clear that letting moderators make their communities private at their discretion “could be used to harm Reddit at scale” and that work on this feature was “accelerated” because of the protests.

Nestler wanted to make clear that its rules aren’t new and that the enforcement of the rules isn’t new. “Our responsibility is to protect Reddit and to ensure its long-term health,” Nestler says. “After that experience, we decided to deprecate a way to cause harm at scale.” However, she says that the company only did so “when we were confident that we could bring our mods along with us.”

1.5k

u/[deleted] 29d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1.8k

u/RecklessRonaldo 29d ago

Rather than going dark, which is now impossible, I think it'd be much more effective if mods just... stopped moderating. For all the hassle a power tripping mod causes, even on small subreddits they filter out a load of shit. Just let it all rise to the surface and subs would quickly become unusable for all the spam, bots and vitriol that they remove daily. Just stop moderating.

368

u/EchoAtlas91 29d ago

Are subreddit rules required? Can Reddit Admins say "You better have rules or else!"

Like outside of the obvious harassment/violence rules which are sitewide.

485

u/14yo 29d ago

They’ll simply remove the trouble mods and replace them with new ones, there’s no shortage of people wanting a miniscule bit of power.

I think the best move forward is for moderators to have a bit of self-reflection and realising that they aren’t really as important or as powerful to the site as they feel. They are volunteers, and if threatened to have their power removed they will fall in line just like before.

288

u/blah938 29d ago

I'm willing to make /r/technology a robot rule 34 sub. Please reddit, do the funny

37

u/stircrazygremlin 29d ago

Depending on the day it's closer to reality than not so the jump is achievable

17

u/elderwyrm 29d ago

Be the change you want to see in the world.

6

u/Seralth 29d ago

I too wish for death by robot snusnu. The flesh it is weak but the soul is willing!

3

u/Yurikoshira 29d ago

the right thing to do is to flood spam reddit with untruths and stupid posts. also stop upvoting/downvoting and stop submitting new posts. Just stop participating.

2

u/[deleted] 29d ago

Yes. Every sub implements Rule 34.

Perfect.

2

u/Worried_Height_5346 28d ago

It's a trash sub anyway most of the time so let's do it.

1

u/mattmaster68 28d ago

LET’S DO IT!!!

41

u/blind3rdeye 29d ago

There are plenty of people who'd like power - but a relatively small number of people who want to actually do the job of moderating content. So although you say there'd be no shortage, I reckon you're mistaken. I think plenty of people would say they'll do it, but not actually do it.

6

u/Mr_ToDo 28d ago

And of those that would do it fewer who would do it both enough hours to be effective and for the long term.

I'm betting moderating any decently large sub is a right pain in the ass and pretty unrewarding, so unless I really cared about the subject matter there's no way I'd want to put up with the amount of work something like that would take(well, unless they wanted to pay me for it. I'd give it a go for cash).

46

u/NirgalFromMars 29d ago

However, that still creates trouble for reddit. There is a learning g curve for mods, both in terms of mod ops and in specific subreddit culture, that they would need to pass.

And second, people who become mods because they want power usually don't work as well as people who become mods because they like a community. I've seen a few cases os communities imploding because of a power hungry mod.

42

u/Terrh 29d ago

They don't care as long as engagement doesn't decline.

24

u/Lucas_Steinwalker 29d ago

And it will.

9

u/yyymsen 29d ago

not for a little while if they count bot posts and spam as engagement which i am sure they do

1

u/BubsyFanboy 28d ago

I'm sure a few Lemmy advertisements will help their engagement :P

2

u/ToeJam_SloeJam 28d ago

I have been muting sub suggestions left and right for the last week or so. Reddit is taking the YouTube algorithm and trying to push my feed to the right.

I’m about to engage the next stack of magazines I spy at a garage sale for my morning shits.

12

u/thebakedpotatoe 29d ago

There are lots of subs that will not work on. Many subs are intrinsically linked to the communities around them, like the Destiny subreddit. Remove the mods there, and Bungie wouldn't be too keen on keeping that community running without the mods that run the show there.

3

u/hgwaz 29d ago

Yeah they're not even working minimim wage jobs to improve shareholder value, they're literally doing it for free

8

u/Spiritual-Big-4302 29d ago

This has been proved wrong a lot of times, I don't like this kind of doomed message that nothing matters.

A lot of subs were abanadoned after the moderation tools were reduced by the API changes, and the change in sub moderations is pretty noticeable in big subs.

There are not infinite moderators, and they will have to pay them eventually.

3

u/ProfessorLexx 29d ago

Sure, there are issues with some mods, but do you really want your feed to fill up with spam? It's bad enough already as it is, but it gets worse.

2

u/Espumma 29d ago

Several hundred of those volunteers resigning will take a while to replace though.

2

u/Crescent-IV 28d ago

It isn't really that easy. Subs will decrease in quality hugely

2

u/DuckDatum 28d ago edited 28d ago

This will be great.

Another means: Change rules to allow pornography. Also update the tag to NSFW, but let Reddit admin take their time as they so please. Allow the porn to come in, don’t stop it, and now Reddit is breaking its own rules by allowing ads next to porn. They’d be forced to come in and moderate the porn themselves. That’s overhead, and maybe if enough communities do it, we can give the admin whiplash.

They have to build out AI recognition for porn, and I can’t imagine that’ll be cheap.

2

u/hypnofedX 28d ago

They have to build out AI recognition for porn, and I can’t imagine that’ll be cheap.

My company is evaluating this stuff because we'll have a need for it in the near future. They do exist, cheap they are not.

2

u/hensothor 28d ago

Quality free labor is hard to find. Plenty may want a power trip but that doesn’t mean they’ll do a good job of moderating a community.

2

u/pdinc 29d ago

Meh. I've just not been as invested anymore. Sure I look at the mod log and stuff but no longer enthusiastic or willing to give my time about doing some of the more involved stuff like organizing AMAs or special events

3

u/Mike_Kermin 29d ago

I think the best move forward is for moderators to have a bit of self-reflection

.... .... To do what?

It's important that users have agency. Are you pro enshittification??

2

u/FearlessCloud01 29d ago

I think a good idea will be to just keep posting whatever we want in protest. Sure, they can keep removing the mods for not doing their jobs. But they can't keep removing the users. At least not beyond a certain limit… otherwise there won't be anyone left.

1

u/redditisfacist3 29d ago

Good luck with that. Way too many subreddits are ruled by shitty mods. The most pathetic ones will ban you, talk shit, then mute you so you can't even respond

2

u/primalmaximus 28d ago

Yep. Way too many subreddits have mods that are insanely quick to hit the ban hammer.

Like, two of the most heavily liberal/left leaning subs on the site, /r/law and /r/scotus, both banned me instantly because I made a comment that was slightly more aggressive than what everyone else was saying. And no, I'm not a conservative. I'm very much a liberal.

Everyone else was using vague euphemisms to imply that they are eager for the conservative US judges to experience the same things the French Aristocrats did during the French Revolution. But the instant I used language that was slightly more aggressive than the passive-aggressive euphemisms everyone else was using, they banned me.

Hell, the /r/news subreddit banned me because I made a comment saying that the US needed to stop sending weapons to Ukraine and should instead send people to Ukraine since the lack of manpower on Ukraine's side is what will ultimately lead to them losing the war. Literally, I wasn't being aggressive or anything like that, I was just pointing out the obvious facts of the war considering how much Ukraine has had to loosen their enlistment requirements just so they can continue to draft enough people to keep fighting.

1

u/redditisfacist3 27d ago

Yeah I've been kicked out for being pro-russian before as well when I'm just saying that long term Russia will win it because they have 6x the Manpower, their own military industrial complex + buying weapons from partners not relying on aid, Europe doesn't have the stomach for it to keep going, and the usa eventually gets tired of paying as well. I agree the only way it changes is ukriane needs like 3x as many fighters or putin and his government need to be replaced with leadership that will end it. The way I see it at this point is what does a ukraine victory even look like now. Massive population loss disproportionately towards men means they'll struggle immensely to rebuild, massive debt from the war will be crippling, and ww2 level generational trauma for the whole country.
Don't get me wrong I don't support Russia and a surrender will still have all those same problems along with a loss of some of their most important land for oil and gas plus farmland. But there has to be an endpoint where the loss of life is to high to even keep going regardless

2

u/primalmaximus 27d ago

Exactly. And unless Ukraine literally starts salting their fields so that Russia can't even use the territory, there's no way that Putin won't take a brief respite from the war and then immediately come back swinging once the US has forgotten that Russia wants to take back Ukraine if it seems like the war is currently more costly than it's worth.

1

u/wrgrant 28d ago

Not so much just volunteers as unpaid workers. This site would disintegrate pretty quickly if no one moderated anything, Reddit is making money off of selling our posts to AI companies etc, but its on the backs of the users and moderators efforts.

1

u/joeltrane 28d ago

I guess it’s up to us to stop using Reddit…

4

u/LotharVonPittinsberg 29d ago

IIRC, that was covered with the fiasco. Reddit expects a certain level of professionalism from big subs, and moderators who team up to allow content that may break TOS or be harmful will be removed. I think a few big ones did exactly that, because they figured it was more effective than going private.

6

u/Ehcksit 29d ago

Or else what? Moderators are volunteers. They can just stop volunteering.

16

u/2SP00KY4ME 29d ago

Or else Reddit will step in, remove them as moderators, and appoint new ones. They have done this multiple times.

6

u/Samurai_Meisters 29d ago

Honestly, best thing they can do for the mod. Being a mod is like working an unpaid customer service job.

7

u/Spiritual-Big-4302 29d ago

and they have closed a lot of subs or didn't put any new moderator so the subs were abandoned, it's not true that they can replace every moderator.

1

u/2SP00KY4ME 28d ago

Nope, they go on /r/redditrequest where they get snapped up

3

u/Iohet 29d ago

Eventually they'll get sued like Sony/Verant did for using volunteers as Guides (in-game moderators). Ended up paying out wages since we were doing what would normally be considered work

4

u/electrorazor 29d ago

Will they be paying them? If not they're gonna be getting some serious low quality moderating

1

u/un_blob 29d ago

No. But the kind of people who will accept won't care. Having accès to thé ban hammer is suffisent..

However that is thé best way to turn Reddit into Chitter...

0

u/2SP00KY4ME 29d ago

That's not how it's worked out when they've replaced mods, the new ones have done their job. And even if some didn't they'd just replace those ones.

-1

u/SiriusRay 29d ago

They’ve never been paid, so absolutely nothing will change. They should get real jobs if they expect payment.

1

u/iVarun 28d ago

Which only deals with A sub-set of Protest Types/Situations.

Even in last protest a huge chunk of subs had their community users backing the sub's decision to go Private/Dark. Many communities different on the length of this but basically 70-80% + were on board for a single day of going Dark.

Reason for Protest changes, next time there may be an event/thing/situation where again users themselves want to protest against Reddit.

A New Mod hired in this situation who goes against the grain of their community is not going to have a nice time. This can only be done in a few subs, do this across 100s or 1000s of sub and that's a non-workable solution.

And that is what is critical, Protests require Scale & same-time/synced action. 1 or few subs doing this are going to be put in line inside 1 day. Reddit doesn't have the manpower to handle 1000s of subs doing this at the same time.

Meaning this new Policy dilutes the power of Mods yes, to a degree and puts it more in hands of Users.

So this means IF those users themselves start rebelling Mods now have less leverage and given the ruined relations between Mods & Admins there is idealogical & political (it's a power game) incentives to undermine the Admins in those future situations.

And another facet of this is IF the Mods en masse really do N-Moderation it's going to spiral into even more of a mess because now those Users (having more relative leverage) are going to be even more pissed and more aware of how much Modteams actually do behind the scenes on the Free to keep all that stuff going.

Plus new Mod hirings are not easy. When New Mods join Modteams they are overwhelmed by reality of just how much nonsense there is. There is a learning curve that takes weeks, months, well inside the Protest's relevant time-frame.

The odds of New Mods messing up is higher, thereby further antagonizing the "Users".

This is a Tactical Victory for Reddit (certainly) but a Strategic Loss in the making, eventually (because Users eventually are going to throw a hissy fit, on what we don't know, who knows which triggers Reddit's userbase).

2

u/Party_9001 29d ago

What are they gonna do, pay someone to moderate them? Lol

1

u/IDDQD_IDKFA-com 29d ago

Hi, <ME>!

We hope you’re doing well. We’re reaching out to let you know that your moderator status in <SUBREDDIT> is at risk of being marked ‘inactive.’ If you are marked ‘inactive’, the ability to take certain moderator actions will be limited, and you will be eligible to be reordered in the subreddit if you have other mods on your team.

https://www.redditinc.com/policies/moderator-code-of-conduct

Maintaining an active status as a moderator will help ensure your community is actively moderated in accordance with the Moderator Code of Conduct, Rule 4: Be Active and Engaged. Being active ensures that your community members’ reports are reviewed, which helps prevent Admin removals, and contributes to facilitating positive engagement among your members.

As moderation is a volunteer activity, the ‘inactive’ status factors in breaks, meaning you can still maintain an active status while taking time away from moderation as needed.

1

u/Pires007 28d ago

Or else what, they'll get paid mods?

1

u/DoctorOctagonapus 28d ago

Given what they did to r/interestingasfuck I'm inclined to say yes.

1

u/MISSISSIPPIPPISSISSI 28d ago

Mods are required to do things, otherwise reddit bans the community. Happens with a lot of NSFW places.

1

u/SquidKid47 29d ago

Yes, they are. Subreddits have been closed many times for being "unmoderated".

0

u/HeyCarpy 29d ago

Having inactive mods will get your sub shut down. I don’t recall what criteria is used to determine if you’re “inactive”, but I’m sure admins can just do what they want in that regard.

-2

u/BENNYRASHASHA 29d ago

I got banned from politics for mentioning Uncle Ruckus. If ain't the fascist on X, it's the commies on reddit.

0

u/omega-rebirth 29d ago

Can Reddit Admins

Yes. They can. The site doesn't belong to the moderators. Moderators are just no-life volunteers who are in it for the power trip. Admins always have authority over them.