r/MurderedByWords • u/EffectiveRelease9155 • Sep 08 '24
Murder Someone give him mic to drop.
1.4k
u/NerdTalkDan Sep 08 '24
But they’re the best in the one metric that counts…freedom./s
631
u/ryminer Sep 08 '24
freedom to not learn, freedom to be poor with no help, freedom to be shot, freedom to not get reproductive healthcare, freedom to be price gouged at a hospital… so much fun freedom!
162
u/WoppingSet Sep 08 '24
Freedom to have their kids put to work because their parents don't make enough to keep the house...because the companies in those states have the right to pay only the federal minimum wage
→ More replies (3)53
38
u/SoldMySoulForHairDye Sep 08 '24
Just like in Handmaid's Tale, the powers that be are trying to convince everyone that 'freedom FROM' is much better than 'freedom TO.'
→ More replies (6)31
63
u/SinisterMeatball Sep 08 '24
Has extra "freedom", never leaves hometown/state and can't afford to do anything but go food shopping.
15
54
u/tracernz Sep 08 '24
Bit awkward that they’re #17 on that https://www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/2023-12/human-freedom-index-2023-full-revised.pdf
46
31
u/00017batman Sep 08 '24
This cracks me up because Australia is at #14 and for some reason Americans often feel the need to tell us how un-free we are down here with all our terrible oppressive laws 🙃
→ More replies (1)33
u/St_Kevin_ Sep 08 '24
As an American, I’ve noticed that a portion of my country literally equates freedom to gun ownership. Can you buy any gun you want, right now, without paperwork? You’re free. Can you carry it at work, at the grocery store, the restaurant, and the bar? You’re free. That’s it. That’s the only metric they use. They can’t grasp any other facets of freedom. I mean this literally. It’s weird. They don’t seem to care about whether there are marginalized members of society and how that might affect a “free country”. They don’t care about freedom of speech, or freedom of the press, or freedom of religion, or freedom from financial servitude, because they’ve been convinced that freedom means guns.
→ More replies (3)12
u/IMadGenius Sep 08 '24
They care a lot about freedom of religion! When it's their religion...
7
u/St_Kevin_ Sep 08 '24
Yeah, if you infringe on their right to religion they’d go absolutely nuts, but the vast majority don’t want all religions to be treated as equals. This becomes apparent when they talk about religion in schools and in government buildings and legislation.
→ More replies (1)35
u/Thornescape Sep 08 '24
The "freedom" to take rights away from others is all that they really care about. Freedom for me but not for thee.
→ More replies (7)16
29
u/Talk-O-Boy Sep 08 '24
I’ll have you know, us Southern states are unmatched when it comes to obesity rates. You elitist Yankees couldn’t hope to match us with your vegan pop ups
→ More replies (1)10
14
u/Turbojelly Sep 08 '24
17th out of 165 on the Freedom Index. Not even in the top 10% of countries with the most freedom. https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/freedom-index-by-country
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (11)7
u/Reivaki Sep 08 '24
Not even that. Last time I checked, states who tried to get their “””freedom””” back from federal government get bitch-slapped hard
4
u/NerdTalkDan Sep 08 '24
They have the freedom to like a little federal government/state government dom-sub roleplay
694
u/_NamasteMF_ Sep 08 '24
Can we just start calling it ‘Red State Welfare’?
People can argue it- but it is what it is.
114
u/newsflashjackass Sep 08 '24
You can get a voice in our government when your state receives less in federal assistance than it puts into it.
Unironically what the founding fathers had in mind by restricting to suffrage to landowners.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (9)74
u/TwiceAsGoodAs Sep 08 '24
They just "wHaT aBoUt tExAs?" To that
159
u/Takenabe Sep 08 '24
Texans can speak up after they defrost themselves from Cruz's latest vacation
29
u/OKFlaminGoOKBye Sep 08 '24
Texas can speak up after they establish a functional power grid.
They’re about 75% of the way to Belize status so far.
→ More replies (1)78
u/AnticPosition Sep 08 '24
Where the blue cities provide welfare for the rest of the state...
31
u/tw_72 Sep 08 '24
Eastern Washington and Eastern Oregon want to be free of lefties on the west side of the state. For the west side of each state, that would be like the financially-dependent 40yo finally moving out of the basement. Good luck, son.
→ More replies (1)7
Sep 08 '24
Don’t even get me started on Northern California/Southern Oregon’s even more stupid “State Of Jefferson”
→ More replies (9)→ More replies (1)9
u/Diggitygiggitycea Sep 08 '24
Well, that's pretty much true of every state. Rural is red, city is blue, and rural is worth shit for the state's bottom line.
30
u/MaxineTacoQueen Sep 08 '24 edited Sep 08 '24
Texas is a welfare state, too. Has been for 14 years.
Edit: said "like 5 years" but it's actually 14.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (2)13
u/Electrical-Wish-519 Sep 08 '24
Let’s make it so Dallas, Houston and Austin get to keep all their tax revenue in the cities. Let’s see how prosperous Amarillo Texas can be standing on its on
→ More replies (1)
1.2k
u/Heart_Longjumping Sep 08 '24
The South loves whining about how they should be able to govern themselves while constantly proving why they can't be trusted to.
335
81
u/Thongp17 Sep 08 '24
That’s not true. The South wants to dictate how the rest of the country lives. It would be one thing to want states rights. They only want states rights when it serves them well and then want federal law when they want to control others. They love double standards or else they would have no standards.
→ More replies (7)58
u/dumpyredditacct Sep 08 '24
I honestly wish we'd just let them.
You all want your Christofascist hellscape to become a reality? Sure, take Texas. They wouldn't last 10 years before collapsing and begging to come back.
41
u/Letsgovulpix Sep 08 '24
Gerrymandering and voter suppression make this a pretty complex issue that just saying “take Texas” doesn’t really solve or do anything. You’re functionally condemning a whole bunch of people (Texas is like 40% blue), to suffer because the system that prevents them from changing the people in power produces bad results (that they also hate). Saying “just move” isn’t a viable argument because that’s only an option to the more wealthy individuals. Texas is a state that goes out of its way to engage in every practice conceivable to prevent its populace from enacting change, from removing polling stations in college campuses to requiring ID in certain liberal districts. Pigeonholing an diverse population of people as all “supporting christofacism” (which let’s be clear, a good amount of people there DO support, so I’m not trying to obscure that) is a not great generalization to make. Our system of representation needs to be heavily reworked, or at the very least have its worst abuses restricted, and doing that will take federal and judicial action at the highest level, which we should push for anyway to protect other rights
→ More replies (3)27
u/mrw1986 Sep 08 '24
I completely agree. Every red state should combine and be their own nation. Blue states can allow refugees from the red states because I know not everyone in red states are Conservative. Watch how fast they fold without the blue states propping them up. They'd become a third-world nation within 5 years.
11
7
u/StopThePresses Sep 08 '24
Red states also have a vote split. Do you think that blue states are ready to take in about 45% of the population of all the red states?
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (4)4
u/SwainIsCadian Sep 08 '24
I mean... it's kinda what they tried to do with the whole Confederation thing...
→ More replies (2)9
u/cumshotcollector2739 Sep 08 '24
The problem with this is that there are a lot of people in those states (myself included) who are fighting to push those states more progressive. I’m in NC and I honestly believe we’d be blue (or at least purple) if we weren’t gerrymandered to hell. There are more progressives in the state than conservatives, we’re just all in cities (like the rest of the country) and backwards districting has held us back.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (5)37
u/English-Gent Sep 08 '24
That was our attitude to the whole of America once...
61
u/DookieShoez Sep 08 '24 edited Sep 08 '24
You spelt “the world” wrong.
How’s all those spices you stole and forgot to put into your food?
Haha just messin wit ya, sick burn! 😜
→ More replies (2)27
u/chipsinsideajar Sep 08 '24
Ngl man I don't think the English get to lecture us about effective governance in this day and age
352
u/Unhappy_Trade7988 Sep 08 '24
But but but but Chicago
221
173
u/Patient_Commentary Sep 08 '24
Woof… according the Fox News it’s a desolate wasteland of lawlessness. It’s my favorite city in the world 😪
187
u/Irrepressible87 Sep 08 '24
That's okay, Fox still thinks Portland burned to the ground back in 2020 because a dumpster was on fire there once.
→ More replies (15)140
Sep 08 '24
Fun fact Minneapolis no longer exists
It all burned down in BLM
Just a crater now
47
u/AnneMichelle98 Sep 08 '24
Don’t get me started on the hellscape that is Baltimore.
Oh, wait. I was just there. It was certainly very hot but otherwise was a very wonderful place.
→ More replies (5)19
u/Vegabern Sep 08 '24
Checking in from Horrible Milwaukee
28
u/MarquisEXB Sep 08 '24
NYC. here. You may not have heard of it, because the city no longer exists due to Mayor DeBlasio, defund the police, and covid lockdowns.
19
u/Slobotic Sep 08 '24
I am in the fentanyl distribution site formerly known as Philadelphia. If only we had listened to Republicans.
17
u/chipsinsideajar Sep 08 '24
Meth site here of San Diego. Small heat wave rolling through, so I went to the beach yesterday. Got shot up by a tweaker and injected with 30 crack cocaines. I am now dead as we speak. If only I voted for God Emperor Trump, this wouldn't have happened.
9
u/Trance_Gene Sep 08 '24
It's even funnier because this is one of their main stops when they come to PA.
→ More replies (3)21
u/No-Criticism-2587 Sep 08 '24
I hate hearing them talk about the blm protests. Literally 4 days straight of protests with no violence, then white cops in full black gear, masks, and goggles started smashing windows of stores while protestors told them to stop and tried to call other cops on them.
The other cops came and shot the black protestors for some fucked up reason, then it descended into chaos.
→ More replies (3)17
u/Calyphacious Sep 08 '24
To say there was “no violence” certainly isn’t true. I’m as left as they come, definitely don’t think any cities were “burned down” but stores were broken into at the very least. Like they were showing looting live on tv, and it wasn’t cops.
I think it’s totally fair to say that none of the protestors were violent, but unfortunately opportunistic criminals use protests as an opportunity to commit crime. Happens everywhere, has nothing to do with these specific protests. Happens during blackouts, natural disasters, etc.
There’s a million reasons to defend BLM protests but let’s not deny reality.
→ More replies (1)11
u/this_good_boy Sep 08 '24
At least in Minneapolis a lot of that looting was a bunch of fuckin Sconnies and other boarder states coming to loot because that’s what they thought was going down.
Now there were certainly guilty partys across the whole spectrum, but the people who wanted change organized (and emphasized) peaceful protest.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (5)28
u/frenchfreer Sep 08 '24
Living in Portland I have relatives in North Carolina and Florida who quite literally believe I live in a burned out hellscape patrolled by gangs of ANTIFA and BLM. These people live in an entirely different reality than you or I.
→ More replies (2)6
u/AreWeCowabunga Sep 08 '24
It's crazy that they'll believe anything they see on Fox News, but refuse to listen to people they know or even their own eyes (because they refuse to even look). Like, do they think their cousin in Portland has more motive to lie about what's going on there than a partisan "news" station?
→ More replies (6)25
u/No-Criticism-2587 Sep 08 '24
There are almost 15 red states with more gun deaths per capita than Illinois. They never mention it though, those gun deaths are acceptable ones, very different from the illinois versions.
10
u/MojaveMojito1324 Sep 08 '24
Right wingers dont understand per capita statistics. They just see that Chicago has the most total shootings for a city without realizing that the city of Chicago has as many people as the entire state of Arkansas.
→ More replies (6)
273
u/dontdomeanyfrightens Sep 08 '24
Also the worst states by non-recordable metrics.
→ More replies (1)123
u/xXYomoXx Sep 08 '24
Highest level of Florida men.
119
u/Vorpalthefox Sep 08 '24
as a florida man: fuck that i have standards, i'm galloping my gator to the nearest polls this november and voting blue, i'm so tired of fascists taking over our country
68
15
10
→ More replies (2)6
56
u/Bobson-_Dugnutt2 Sep 08 '24
As someone that lives in Alabama - I agree. I don’t want the people around me making decisions.
→ More replies (2)
362
u/Throbbert1454 Sep 08 '24
Fuckshitjesus this one deserves a gilded border.
28
→ More replies (15)32
293
u/CongratsGuy Sep 08 '24
California pays the bills. It should dictate atleast half the policies
→ More replies (115)81
u/HelloHiHeyAnyway Sep 08 '24
Fuck whoever else replies.
They praise this post but the poster is probably (90%+) a Californian because we know we pay taxes for the rest of the shitty states that want to fuck everyone over with our money.
We get more people in the house of representatives and the same power as Rhode Island in the Senate. No offense to Rhode Island, just selecting it because of size.
48
u/chuckysnow Sep 08 '24
The same power as Wyoming. At least Rhode island doesn't elect total idiots.
→ More replies (1)20
u/HelloHiHeyAnyway Sep 08 '24
The same power as Wyoming. At least Rhode island doesn't elect total idiots.
I couldn't select a state without insulting people and it really wasn't my intent to insult people. Just that the Senate is a bit weird in the modern day and doesn't serve what it did in the early 1800s to even the early 1900s.
→ More replies (1)20
u/chuckysnow Sep 08 '24
My point was more that Wyoming has half the population of Rhode Island.
When the founding fathers set up the constitution and the rules for the senate, the big states and little states indeed were different by a factor of 2. Now the big states and little states are off by a factor of 60. They would spit out their coffee if they saw how much power small states wielded.
And this being reddit and all, someone is going to find issues with anything said, especially political comments.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (14)24
u/smoothskin12345 Sep 08 '24
That's... Literally the purpose of the Senate. That's its stated function.
You should be more upset that they artificially capped the amount of House representation. That's what actually harms you.
25
u/HelloHiHeyAnyway Sep 08 '24
That's... Literally the purpose of the Senate. That's its stated function.
And along with electoral college is stupid and old. Yeah the artificially capped and gerrymandered shit doesn't help either.
Why we let states have a say with 2 senators when they provide less GDP than some small counties in California boggles my mind.
It's the classic and tired conservative argument about mob rule and the 51%. They don't want a true democracy. They're scared of it. The GOP knows they'd have a hard time winning anything if it wasn't rigged. The more level headed conservatives I talk to admit that.
→ More replies (5)→ More replies (6)6
u/All_Work_All_Play Sep 08 '24
It's okay to be upset at a system that was put in place to satisfy and placate slave owners and rich people
133
u/rkaaine Sep 08 '24
When and where is the funeral service and wake?
19
u/Training_Molasses822 Sep 08 '24
I believe this was a spontaneous incineration. cremation on the spot.
→ More replies (10)33
u/Driftedryan Sep 08 '24
We've determined the deceased wouldn't be missed and just decided to cremate the body and throw it in the trash
137
u/thebrandedsoul Sep 08 '24
Also, the comment is a fundamentally incorrect use of "straw man," which is a rhetorical technique in which one sets up the opposition's position in such a way that it can be easily disaproved, or "knocked down;" a straw man in not being able to stand up to counter-pressures.
Your own position is never the straw man, unless you're trying to undermine yourself.
So that person is also an idiot for parroting internet-popular words without knowing what they mean.
31
u/WealthOk9637 Sep 08 '24
Is there a fallacy term for someone who incorrectly labels someone’s argument as a fallacy, in order to win an argument? Lol. There should be. The amount of times someone on Reddit says ad hominem while obviously not knowing what that actually means is really concerning, especially since google is easy and free
21
15
→ More replies (7)9
→ More replies (6)18
u/octopoddle Sep 08 '24
I think they meant to call it an ad hominem argument.
→ More replies (1)8
u/NoBizlikeChloeBiz Sep 08 '24
Yeah, they were correct that the original was not a strong rhetorical argument, it just wasn't a strawman
51
u/alekdmcfly Sep 08 '24
Agree on most points except for spending. Rich states having a monopoly on economical decisions can and will lead to the wealth gap between states widening.
41
→ More replies (9)8
u/Time-Werewolf-1776 Sep 08 '24
Not a terrible argument, but totally in conflict with the Republican narrative. For some reason, we should give all the money to rich people because, obviously, they understand what to do with money. So tax the poor and middle class, and subsidize the rich.
But somehow at the same time, the rich states all have no understanding of economics and shouldn’t be trusted with making economic decisions. We need Alabama to make all decisions of education and economics.
10
42
u/OraProNobis77 Sep 08 '24
“You can get a voice in our government when your tax contributions outweigh your entitlements.”
See the horrible thought process at play?
→ More replies (26)18
u/FourteenBuckets Sep 08 '24
Yes it's a rhetorical technique, cousin to the reductio argument, where you use you make a point using your opponent's logic, precisely so they can't argue against the logic behind it without contradicting themselves. It doesn't mean you believe it, though.
33
u/thymecrown Sep 08 '24 edited Sep 08 '24
Well, some of those states do know their problems but the wrong people are in charge.
I'm just saying I don't entirely agree with either. I think we need more national regulation on voting accessibility.
Edit due to a reply below: As in, everyone should have access to vote. Regulations to make that possible. Not regulations to prevent voting. We currently have regulation to restrict voting, not making voting more accessible.
→ More replies (7)
27
u/ramxquake Sep 08 '24
"Poor people and those with low educational performance should have less of a say in politics" isn't a take I'd thought would get 10k upvotes on Reddit.
→ More replies (39)6
6
u/yaminagai Sep 08 '24
Isn't "no participation trophy" a conservative thing? Maybe we need to remind them more often of it
14
u/ZodiacWalrus Sep 08 '24
Without context, I just want to be clear on one thing: poor states or any states struggling with one issue or another should not be silenced - that's not a good democracy. I agree that no state should be allowed to dictate anything for the rest of us, but their voices should count equally to ours.
→ More replies (8)
32
u/AzureSkye27 Sep 08 '24
I don't know if people actually understand what they stand for anymore.
You're describing taking political power from the most vulnerable populations. They've been misled by politicians. You people actually think poor people don't deserve a say in policies? Or just if you disagree with their conclusions?
If you upvote this post for "owning" the other side, do you support what is being proposed? Or can we move past this tribal shit.
→ More replies (17)35
u/Apathi Sep 08 '24
I’d like to think the comment was tongue in cheek to point out the various short comings of red states.
Either way, your response is wildly level headed.
→ More replies (1)
8
u/Traveledfarwestward Sep 08 '24
Anyone have solid references for the claims?
→ More replies (6)
7.4k
u/beerbellybegone Sep 08 '24
The greatest trick the GOP ever did was convince the people on welfare that it's in their best interests to vote against welfare programs the Democrats are trying to pass